Perceived Barriers in the Decision for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Results from a Representative Study in Germany
Attitudes of the general public may be an influencing factor for low surgery rates: When skepticism is high, support for individuals wanting or needing to undergo surgery may diminish. This study assesses the relevance of barriers to metabolic surgery.
The study was conducted using a representative sample of the German population (n = 1007). Participants were asked to imagine that they would have to decide for or against metabolic surgery and rate how this decision would be influenced by a number of reasons given to them (Likert scale). Results are presented by weight status.
The barrier found most irrelevant is that surgery could be considered cheating across all weight groups. About a fourth of the sample state that not knowing enough about surgery (28.5%), being afraid of surgery (28.3%), and potential negative consequences after surgery (24.5%) are reasons against metabolic surgery that were rated extremely relevant. Having obesity was a significant predictor of endorsement in two variables: feeling like cheating (lower probability for relevance, OR = 0.58, p = 0.025) and a lack of knowledge (lower probability for relevance, OR = 0.59, p = 0.031).
In summary, the public’s view of weight loss surgery lacks information about post-surgical consequences. It is important to address these points in the public and in social networks of patients as they may be pre- or antecedent of surgery stigma.
KeywordsMetabolic surgery Bariatric surgery Attitudes Barriers General public
This work was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, FKZ, 01EO1501.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Leipzig (approval number 267-15-24082015).
Conflict of Interest
CLS has received honoraria from Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson) for talks and consultation. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie. 1 S3-Leitlinie: Chirurgie der Adipositas und metabolischer Erkrankungen [Internet]; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 13]. Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/088-001l_S3_Chirurgie-Adipositas-metabolische-Erkrankugen_2018-02.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.
- 4.Lenzen-Schulte M. Therapie der Fettleibigkeit: Nur Hürden statt Hilfe für Adipöse; [Treatment for obesity: barriers instead of help]. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(11):A–484.Google Scholar
- 12.Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, Parikh JA, Dutson E, Mehran A, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: a systematic review. England; 2011.Google Scholar
- 13.Dolan P, Afaneh C, Symer M, et al. Assessment of public attitudes toward weight loss surgery in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4650.
- 15.Behr D, Harkness JA, Fitzgerald R, et al. Round 4 ESS translation strategies and procedures. London: European Social Survey, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University; 2008.Google Scholar
- 16.StataCorp LP. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2015.Google Scholar