Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 2739–2744 | Cite as

A 5-Year Follow-up in Children and Adolescents Undergoing One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) at a European IFSO Excellence Center (EAC-BS)

  • Miguel A. Carbajo
  • Gilberto Gonzalez-Ramirez
  • Jose Maria Jimenez
  • Enrique Luque-de-Leon
  • Javier Ortiz-de-Solorzano
  • Maria Jose Castro
  • Jaime Ruiz-TovarEmail author
Original Contributions

Abstract

Background

The children and adolescent population with obesity has increased worldwide, both in developing areas and in developed countries. Consequently, the prevalence of morbid obesity among this population has also increased, leading to an exponential growth of bariatric approaches in this population. Many surgeons fear eventual nutritional sequelae after malabsorptive approaches and prefer restrictive or mixed procedures.

Methods

A retrospective review of all the morbidly obese patients between 13 and 19 years, undergoing a one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) as bariatric procedure between 2004 and 2012, was performed.

Results

A total of 39 patients were included, 8 males (20.5%) and 31 females (79.5%), with a mean age of 17.8 ± 2 years (range 13–19 years). Mean preoperative weight was 114.3 ± 20.4 kg and mean BMI 42.2 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Preoperative comorbidities include only type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in 7.9% of the patients, hypertension in 10.3%, and dyslipidemia in 23.1%. Five years after surgery, mean BMI was 25.9 ± 5.3 kg/m2 and total weight loss 32.1 ± 15.7%. Remission rate of T2DM, hypertension and dyslipidemia was 100%. All the patients received multivitamin and vitamin D supplementation. Anemia secondary to iron deficiency occurred in one female, requiring intravenous iron supplementation during 1 year and later on oral supplementation.

Conclusions

OAGB is a valid alternative for long-term weight loss and remission of comorbidities in childhood and adolescence. No cases of malnutrition or growth disorders were observed.

Keywords

Childhood Adolescence Obesity OAGB Malabsorptive procedures Long-term follow-up 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human Rights

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390:2627–2642.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO European Database on Nutrition, Obesity and Physical Activity (NOPA). http://data.euro.who.int/nopa/. Accessed Dec 2018.
  3. 3.
    Carbajo MA, Vazquez-Pelcastre R, Aparicio-Ponce R, et al. 12 year old adolescent with super morbid obesity, treated with laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB/BAGUA): a case report after 5-year follow-up. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31:2327–32.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michalsky M, Reichard K, Inge T, et al. ASMBS pediatric committee best practice guidelines. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:1–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pratt JS, Lenders CM, Dionne EA, et al. Best practice updates for pediatric/adolescent weight loss surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:901–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbajo MA, Garcia Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:398–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee WJ, Lin YH. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1749–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marceau P, Marceau S, Biron S, et al. Long-term experience with duodenal switch in adolescents. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1609–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carbajo MA, Castro MJ, Kleinfinger S, et al. Efectos de una dieta-formula normocalórica e hiperproteica (Vegestart complet®) vs dieta normal baja en calorias en pacientes con obesidad morbida como preparacion a cirugía bariátrica (bypass gástrico laparoscópico de una anastomosis): estudio prospectivo doble ciego aleatorizado. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25:939–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carbajo MA, Luque de Leon E, Jimenez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1153–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vanhala M, Vanhala P, Kumpusalo E, et al. Relation between obesity from childhood to adulthood and the metabolic syndrome: population based study. Br Med J. 1998;317:319–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for adolescents with morbid obesity. In: McGuire MM, editor. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery Elsevier; 2014. p. 21–23.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xanthakos S, Miles L, Bucuvalas J, et al. Histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in morbidly obese adolescents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:226–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwimmer JB, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Health-related quality of life of severely obese children and adolescents. JAMA. 2003;289:1813–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Williams GR, et al. The relationship between health-related quality of life and weight loss. Obes Res. 2001;9:564–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cozacov Y, Roy M, Moon S, et al. Mid-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-Y gastric bypass in adolescent patients. Obes Surg. 2014;24:747–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alqahtani AR, Antonisamy B, Alamri H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 108 obese children and adolescents aged 5 to 21 years. Ann Surg. 2012;256:266–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Inge TH, Krebs NF, Garcia VF, et al. Bariatric surgery for severely overweight adolescents: concerns and recommendations. Pediatrics. 2004;114:217–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, et al. Indications for surgery for obesity and weight-related diseases: position statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2016;26:1659–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woolford SJ. To cut or not to cut: physicians’ perspectives on referring adolescents for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20:937–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karasko D. Weight loss in adolescents after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. J Pediatr Health Care. 2018;33:26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.05.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peña AS, Delko T, Couper R, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in Australian adolescents: should it be done? Obes Surg. 2017;27:1667–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olbers T, Beamish AJ, Gronowitz E, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in adolescents with severe obesity (AMOS): a prospective, 5-year, Swedish nationwide study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:174–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vilallonga R, Moreno Villares JM, Yeste Fernandez D, et al. Initial approach to childhood obesity in Spain. A multisociety expert panel assessment. Obes Surg. 2017;27:997–1006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Melissas J, Stavroulakis K, Tzikoulis V, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Data from IFSO-European Chapter Center of Excellence Program. Obes Surg. 2017;27:847–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic roux- en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:516–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, González G, et al. Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities. Surg Endosc. 2018;33:401–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient – 2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of clinical endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society of Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:159–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shoar S, Mahmoudzadeh H, Naderan M, et al. Long-term outcome of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 950 patients with a minimum of 3 years follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27:3110–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Papadia FS, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Bariatric surgery in adolescents: a long-term follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:465–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flores M, Vazquez R, Valdez JF, et al. Results of the OAGB in adolescents. In: Deitel M, editor. Essential of Mini-One anastomosis gastric bypass. Toronto: Springer; 2018. p. 273–84.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sakran N. The question of bile gastro-esophageal reflux. In: Deitel M, editor. Essentials of Mini-One anastomosis gastric bypass. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1724–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1299–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee WJ, Chen CY, Chong K, et al. Changes in postprandial gut hormones after metabolic surgery: a comparison advances in bariatric/metabolic surgery of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:683–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang FG, Bai RX, Yan WM, et al. Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers, morbidly obese patients and post-bariatric surgery patients. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:2268–78.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel A. Carbajo
    • 1
  • Gilberto Gonzalez-Ramirez
    • 1
  • Jose Maria Jimenez
    • 1
  • Enrique Luque-de-Leon
    • 1
  • Javier Ortiz-de-Solorzano
    • 1
  • Maria Jose Castro
    • 1
  • Jaime Ruiz-Tovar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and DiabetesValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations