Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions for the Management of Obesity: a Meta-analysis to Compare Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, AspireAssist, and Primary Obesity Surgery Endolumenal
- 54 Downloads
Background and Aims
Novel endoscopic procedures (endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), AspireAssist (AA), and primary obesity surgery endolumenal (POSE)) have been developed for treatment of obesity. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these three endoscopic procedures.
Main outcomes of interest were percent excess weight loss (%EWL) and percent total body weight loss (%TBWL). Weighted pooled means (WPMs) were calculated and analyzed using random effects model. Mean differences (MDs) were calculated to compare these procedures.
Twelve studies with 1149 patients were included. WPMs for %EWL at 6 and 12 months with ESG were 49.67 (45.67, 53.66) and 52.75 (43.52, 61.98), respectively, while %TBWLs at 6 and 12 months with ESG were 16.01 (15.10, 16.92) and 17.41 (17.08, 17.74), respectively. WPMs for %EWL at 6 and 12 months with POSE were 43.79 (40.17, 47.42) and 44.91 (40.90, 48.92), respectively. WPM for %EWL at 12 months with AA was 50.85 (46.03, 55.68). While comparing ESG and POSE, at 6 months and 12 months, MD for %EWL was 6.17 (1.07, 11.26; P = 0.01) and 7.84 (− 2.05, 17.71; P = 0.06) in favor of ESG. No difference in %EWL was observed while comparing ESG with AA (P = 0.29). Likewise, MD for %EWL to compare AA and POSE was not significant (P = 0.68).
During a follow-up of 6–12 months, both AA and ESG had excellent efficacy in achieving significant and sustained weight loss; however, ESG was found to be superior in terms of weight loss when compared with POSE.
KeywordsBariatric endoscopy Obesity Sleeve gastroplasty POSE AspireAssist
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Disclosures and Conflict of Interest
Reem Z. Sharaiha is a consultant of BSC and Apollo Endosurgery. All other authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest relevant to this study.
Systematic review and meta-analysis does not require formal consent.
Informed consent does not apply to this systematic review and meta-analysis.
- 1.World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight - fact sheet no. 312. Updated March 2013. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed 2 July 2018.
- 3.CDC. Adult obesity causes & consequences. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/causes.html. Accessed 2 July 2018.
- 10.Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):159–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.DG HJA. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2008;Version 5.0.1.Google Scholar
- 14.NIH. Quality assessment tool for before-after studies with no control group. National Institutes of Health Web site; 2014. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/before-after. Accessed 2 July 2018.
- 23.Kumar N, Abu Dayyeh BK, Lopez-Nava Breviere G, et al. Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty: procedure evolution from first-in-man cases through current technique. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(4):2159–64.Google Scholar
- 29.Lopez-Nava G, Galvao MP, da Bautista-Castano I, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for the treatment of obesity. Endoscopy. 2015;47(5):449–52.Google Scholar
- 30.Breviere GLN, Bautista-Castano I, Fernandez-Corbelle JP, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (Apollo method): new approach in the treatment of obesity. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016;108(4):201–6.Google Scholar
- 32.Lopez-Nava G, Galvao M, Bautista-Castaño I, et al. First results after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with a follow up time of 6 months. Obes Surg. 2014;24(8):1311–2.Google Scholar
- 41.Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(8):CD003641.Google Scholar