Advertisement

Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Requiring Revisional Surgery after One-Anastomosis-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Case Series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS)

  • Alireza Khalaj
  • Mohammad Ali Kalantar Motamedi
  • Pouria Mousapour
  • Majid Valizadeh
  • Maryam BarzinEmail author
Original Contributions

Abstract

Introduction

One-anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) is the second most popular gastric bypass procedure with remarkable weight loss results and comorbidity resolution rates. However, some concerns remain regarding its postoperative complications, including protein-calorie malnutrition (PCM). We hereby report our experience with patients who returned with severe PCM after OAGB-MGB.

Methods

Patients with severe obesity presenting to our referral bariatric center underwent OAGB-MGB surgery using a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb (BPL) by a single surgical team at three university hospitals from March 2014 to February 2016.

Results

From 189 patients undergoing OAGB-MGB, seven patients (3.7%), all female, with a mean age of 46.4 ± 8.2 years and initial body mass index (BMI) of 44.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2, were readmitted for signs of PCM. Lower extremity edema, fatigue, excessive weight loss, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and pancytopenia were the presenting symptoms and lab findings. Revisional surgery was performed at a mean 19 ± 9.7 months after OAGB-MGB after failure of supportive measures. The mean BMI at the time of revision was 22.5 ± 2.6 kg/m2 with an excess weight loss of 109.2 ± 22.1%. After revisional surgery, one patient developed profound liver failure and expired. Another patient developed severe steatohepatitis but ultimately recovered. In the remaining five, edema and fatigue completely resolved at 1 month and hypoalbuminemia and anemia normalized at 2 months.

Conclusion

A one-fits-all BPL length of 200 cm is increasingly being questioned as it may result in an inadequate absorptive area and PCM in a subset of patients with shorter total bowel lengths, potentially placing them in danger and depriving them of bariatric surgery benefits.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Mini-gastric bypass One-anastomosis gastric bypass Protein-energy malnutrition, surgical revision 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Dr. M. Hassan K. Motamedi for his language edit of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board (no. IR.SBMU.ENDOCRINE.REC 1397.0592018-05-08). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80.  https://doi.org/10.1381/096089201321336584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carbajo MA, Luque-de-Leon E, Jimenez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2428-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):984–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2726-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schlottmann F, Nayyar A, Herbella FAM, et al. Preoperative evaluation in bariatric surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(8):925–9.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_198_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):926–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Parmar C, et al. Small bowel limb lengths and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):660–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2050-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, et al. The PROCESS 2018 statement: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines. Int J Surg. 2018;60:279–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barzin M, Hosseinpanah F, Motamedi MA, et al. Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS) rationale and study design. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(1):e8.  https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motamedi MAK, Barzin M, Ebrahimi M, et al. Severe fatal protein malnutrition and liver failure in a morbidly obese patient after mini-gastric bypass surgery: case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;33:71–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.02.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Motamedi MAK, Rakhshani N, Khalaj A, et al. Biopsy-proven progressive fatty liver disease nine months post mini-gastric bypass surgery: a case study. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;39:168–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.07.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-3070-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nimeri A, Al Hadad M, Khoursheed M, et al. The peri-operative bariatric surgery care in the Middle East Region. Obes Surg. 2017;27(6):1543–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2503-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):321–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0726-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahawar KK, Borg CM, Kular KS, et al. Understanding objections to one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: a survey of 417 surgeons not performing this procedure. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2222–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2663-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nimeri A. Making sense of gastric/intestinal bypass surgeries: forget the name and remember the degree of restriction and malabsorption the surgeries provide. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):716–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hess DS. Limb measurements in duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):966.  https://doi.org/10.1381/096089203322618885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tacchino RM. Bowel length: measurement, predictors, and impact on bariatric and metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):328–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahawar KK. Gastric bypass is not a “restrictive and Malabsorptive” procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2225–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2270-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, et al. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):486–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alireza Khalaj
    • 1
  • Mohammad Ali Kalantar Motamedi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pouria Mousapour
    • 3
  • Majid Valizadeh
    • 3
  • Maryam Barzin
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Tehran Obesity Treatment Center, Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineShahed UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Surgery at St. Paul’s HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations