Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 3253–3258 | Cite as

Minimizing the Short-term Reoperation Rate in Abdominoplasty Procedures by Prolonged Postoperative Immobilization

  • Karl Schwaiger
  • Stephanie Tiede
  • Wolfgang Hitzl
  • Rene Kaplan
  • Frederik DeMeyer
  • Klemens Heinrich
  • Michaela Hladik
  • Gottfried Wechselberger
  • Elisabeth Russe
Original Contributions
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Abdominoplasty is a common procedure in postbariatric surgery. Over the years, a high number of technical refinements of the procedure have been established to improve safety and reduce associated complications. Nevertheless, the complication rate is high. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty in association with prolonged postoperative immobilization.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 82 patients who underwent abdominoplasty was performed. Patients were divided in two study groups regarding their immobilization period. Group 1 included patients with an immobilization period defined as strict bed rest for at least 45 h after surgery. Group 2 included all patients with shorter immobilization time, but earliest mobilization in the evening on the day of surgery.

Results

Overall, complication rate was 27%. Major complications were observed in 15% in group 1 and in 23% in group 2. Hematoma requiring surgical revision was observed in 5% in group 1 and in 14% in group 2. Surgical revisions within the first 60 days were necessary in 5% in group 1 and in 20% in group 2.

Conclusion

Prolonged immobilization after abdominoplasty does not crucially lower the overall complication rate, but influences the severity of complications in a positive way. Increasing the duration of postoperative immobilization up to 45 h after abdominoplasty significantly decreases the reoperation rate in our practice. The risk for a surgical revision is nearly four times higher if the patient leaves bed earlier. Surgeons should consider this option especially in patients with a high risk for complication development.

Keywords

Abdominoplasty Complications Mobilization Reoperation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights/Ethical Approval

The study was performed in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. 1.
    Grazer FM. Abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51(6):617–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grazer FM, Goldwyn RM. Abdominoplasty assessed by survey, with emphasis on complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(4):513–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stewart KJ, Stewart DA, Coghlan B, et al. Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1152–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neaman KC, Armstrong SD, Baca ME, et al. Outcomes of traditional cosmetic abdominoplasty in a community setting: a retrospective analysis of 1008 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):403e–10e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neaman KC, Hansen JE. Analysis of complications from abdominoplasty: a review of 206 cases at a university hospital. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(3):292–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staalesen T, Elander A, Strandell A, et al. A systematic review of outcomes of abdominoplasty. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(3–4):139–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grieco M, Grignaffini E, Simonacci F, et al. Analysis of complications in postbariatric abdominoplasty: our experience. Plast Surg Int. 2015;2015:e209173.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winocour J, Gupta V, Ramirez JR, et al. Abdominoplasty: risk factors, complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):597e–606e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quaba AA, Conlin S, Quaba O. The no-drain, no-quilt abdominoplasty: a single-surgeon series of 271 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(3):751–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pitanguy I. Abdominal lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg. Juli 1975;2(3):401–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beer GM, Wallner H. Prevention of seroma after abdominoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(3):414–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baroudi R, Ferreira CA. Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J. 1998;18(6):439–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pollock TA, Pollock H. Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty: a review of 597 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(6):729–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davison SP, Venturi ML, Attinger CE, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(3):43E–51E.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patronella CK, Ruiz-Razura A, Newall G, et al. Thromboembolism in high-risk aesthetic surgery: experience with 17 patients in a review of 3871 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(6):648–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Schwaiger
    • 1
  • Stephanie Tiede
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Hitzl
    • 2
  • Rene Kaplan
    • 1
  • Frederik DeMeyer
    • 1
  • Klemens Heinrich
    • 1
  • Michaela Hladik
    • 1
  • Gottfried Wechselberger
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Russe
    • 1
  1. 1.Hospital of St. John of God (Barmherzige Brüder) Salzburg, Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive SurgeryParacelsus Medical UniversitySalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Research Office – BiostatisticsParacelsus Medical UniversitySalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations