Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 3172–3176 | Cite as

Patient-Related Factors Predicting Workspace Conditions during Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

  • Paola Aceto
  • Cristina Modesti
  • Teresa Sacco
  • Roberto De Cicco
  • Valter Perilli
  • Marco Raffaelli
  • Carlo Lai
  • Liliana Sollazzi
Original Contributions
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have focused on the role of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in improving surgical conditions during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. However, a wide inter-individual variability has been noted. The aim of this study was to identify patient-related factors affecting surgeon satisfaction with the surgical space and surgery duration in laparoscopic bariatric surgery under deep NMB.

Methods

One hundred eighty-five patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric bypass were enrolled. Anesthesia was standardized. A deep NMB was maintained together with fixed patient positioning (30 reverse Trendelenburg) and constant pneumoperitoneum pressure (14 mmHg) during the whole surgical procedure. Immediately after surgery, the surgeon was invited to state his satisfaction with the surgical space through a verbal numeric scale (VNS) ranging from 0 (extremely poor) to 10 (optimal).

Results

VNS score was negatively correlated with male gender (r = − 0.35; p = 0.0001), BMI (r = − 0.16; p = 0.03), and age (r = − 0.20; p = 0.008). Surgery duration was positively correlated with male gender (r = 0.27; p = 0.0003) and BMI (r = 0.22; p = 0.006). Multivariate linear regressions showed that lower VNS scores were predicted by male gender (p = 0.000001) and increased age (p = 0.009), and that a longer surgery duration was predicted by male gender (p = 0.0002).

Conclusions

Findings showed that male gender and higher patient age were independent predictors of lower surgeon satisfaction with the workspace during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Male gender also had a significant role in predicting longer surgery duration. The role of android obesity, which is more frequently associated with male gender, in affecting surgeon-perceived workspace conditions needs further investigation.

Keywords

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery Obese Patients-centered care Prediction Personalized medicine Surgeon satisfaction Workspace Deep neuromuscular block 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standard

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrio J, Errando CL, San Miguel G, et al. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:197–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, et al. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:498–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruintjes MH, van Helden EV, Braat AE, et al. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:834–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, et al. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ledowski T. Muscle relaxation in laparoscopic surgery: what is the evidence for improved operating conditions and patient outcome? A brief review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25:281–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Torensma B, Martini CH, Boon M, et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during bariatric surgery and reduces postoperative pain: a randomized double blind controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167907.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baete S, Vercruysse G, Vander Laenen M, et al. The effect of deep versus moderate neuromuscular block on surgical conditions and postoperative respiratory function in bariatric laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double blind clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1469–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aceto P, Perilli V, Modesti C, et al. Airway management in obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:809–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langeron O, Birenbaum A, Le Saché F, et al. Airway management in obese patient. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80:382–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, et al. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1013–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrini F, Di Giacinto I, Cataldo R, et al. Perioperative and periprocedural airway management and respiratory safety for the obese patient: 2016 SIAARTI Consensus. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82:1314–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenberg J, Herring WJ, Blobner M, et al. Deep neuromuscular blockade improves laparoscopic surgical conditions: a randomized, controlled study. Adv Ther. 2017;34:925–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vlot J, Wijnen R, Stolker RJ, et al. Optimizing working space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effects of intra-abdominal pressure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1668–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuk JL, Saunders TJ, Davidson LE, et al. Age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution. Ageing Res Rev. 2009;8:339–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jura M, Obesity KLP. Related consequences to ageing. Age (Dordr). 2016;38:23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
  2. 2.Division of Endocrine and Metabolic SurgeryFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Dynamic and Clinical PsychologySapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations