Advertisement

Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Vitish Singla
  • Sandeep AggarwalEmail author
  • Bhanu Singh
  • Gattu Tharun
  • Varidh Katiyar
  • Amit Bhambri
Original Contributions
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The data on the role of OAGB in super obese patients and its direct comparison with LSG in super obese patients is scarce.

Objectives

To compare weight loss, impact on comorbidities and nutritional parameters between LSG and OAGB in super obese patients.

Methods

Prospectively collected data of 75 matched patients with BMI > 50, who underwent either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), was analyzed retrospectively. Percentage excess weight loss at 1 year and impact on comorbidities were compared in both the groups.

Results

Both the groups were comparable for age, sex, BMI, and presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Mean TWL% ± 2SD at 1 year was 30.09% ± 19.76 in patients undergoing LSG, while it was 39.9% ± 12.78 in patients undergoing OAGB (p < 0.001). In the LSG group, 85.7% and 66.67% of patients had remission of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, respectively, as compared to 77.77% and 78.5%, respectively, in the OAGB group. All the patients with OSA had a resolution of their symptoms in both the groups. Patients in the OAGB group became more folate deficient despite regular supplementation.

Conclusion

Weight loss following OAGB was found to be better than LSG in the super obese patients in our study. There was a similar resolution of comorbidities and a lesser rate of major complications in the OAGB group.

Keywords

Outcomes Super obese Sleeve gastrectomy One anastomosis gastric bypass 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Since this is a retrospective study, there was no commission or omission of intervention for the study purpose and all the interventions were done in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

For this type of study, formal consent is not required; however, a written informed consent was taken from each patient for the surgical procedure.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI>50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:858–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2009;5:469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2010;6:1–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noel P, Nedelcu M, Eddbali I, et al. What are the long-term results 8 years after sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2017;13:1110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gadiot RPM, Biter LU, van Mil S, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: 5 to 8-year results. Obes Surg. 2017;27:59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Carr WR, et al. Current status of mini-gastric bypass. J Minimal Access Surg. 2016;12:305–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in the super-super obese: outcomes in 16 patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1126–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Villamere J, Gebhart A, Vu S, et al. Body mass index is predictive of higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass but not laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric banding. Am Surg. 2014;80:1039–43.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parmar C, Abdelhalim MA, Mahawar KK, et al. Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3504–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plamper A, Lingohr P, Nadal J, et al. Comparison of mini-gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in a mainly super-obese patient group: first results. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1156–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madhok B, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Management of Super-super Obese Patients: comparison between mini (one anastomosis) gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1646–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM. Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:1074–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1794–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Epstein LJ, Kristo D, Strollo PJ, et al. Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ Am Acad Sleep Med. 2009;5:263–76.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, et al. Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2014;10:177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252:319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee W-J, Lin Y-H. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1749–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, et al. Efficacy of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus remission: the role of mini gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at 1 year of follow-up. A European survey. Obes Surg. 2016;26:933–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1890–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1724–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee W-J, Pok E-H, Almulaifi A, et al. Medium-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a matched comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1431–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benaiges D, Más-Lorenzo A, Goday A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: more than a restrictive bariatric surgery procedure? World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11804–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee W-J, Chong K, Lin Y-H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of a randomized trial and study of incretin effect. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1552–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee W-J, Chong K, Ser K-H, et al. Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960. 2011;146:143–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee W-J, Hur KY, Lakadawala M, et al. Gastrointestinal metabolic surgery for the treatment of diabetic patients: a multi-institutional international study. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2012;16:45–51. discussion 51-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kansou G, Lechaux D, Delarue J, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini gastric bypass: One year outcomes. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2016;33(Pt A):18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eisenberg D, Bellatorre A, Bellatorre N. Sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone bariatric operation for severe, morbid, and super obesity. JSLS. 2013;17:63–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madhok BM, Mahawar KK, Hadfield JN, et al. Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Obes. 2018;8:43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fujioka K. Follow-up of nutritional and metabolic problems after bariatric surgery. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:481–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgical DisciplinesAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations