Perception of Hunger/Satiety and Nutrient Intake in Women Who Regain Weight in the Postoperative Period After Bariatric Surgery
- 91 Downloads
To investigate the perception of hunger and satiety and its association with nutrient intake in women who regain weight in the postoperative period after bariatric surgery.
Cross-sectional study of adult women divided into three groups: weight regain (n = 20), stable weight (n = 20) (both at least 24 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery), and non-operated obesity (n = 20). A visual analogue scale measured hunger/satiety perception while fasting, immediately after finishing a test meal, and 180 min after finishing the test meal. The incremental area above or under the curve was calculated. Food intake was analyzed by 3 days of food recall and adjusted for intraindividual variation. To make between-group comparisons, Mann-Whitney, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and independent-samples T tests and Pearson’s correlation were used.
There were no between-group differences in incremental areas of hunger/satiety, but protein intake was significantly lower among patients who regained weight compared with those who had stable body weight (0.99 ± 0.23 g/kg body weight vs. 1.17 ± 0.21 g/kg body weight, p = 0.047). In the group that regained weight, satiety was correlated positively with usual dietary protein density (r = 0.541; p = 0.017) and negatively with usual carbohydrate intake (r = − 0.663; p = 0.002).
Women who regained weight presented similar perceptions of hunger/satiety to those of patients without weight regain and with non-operated obesity. In patients who regained weight postoperatively, satiety perception was correlated positively with usual dietary protein density and inversely with usual carbohydrate intake.
KeywordsSatiety response Hunger Dietary assessment Weight regain Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
We thank Richard Lipkin, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
This study was funded by Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District – Brazil (FAPDF), no. 10569.56.30088.09042016.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Statements Regarding Ethics and Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.Giusti V, Theytaz F, Di Vetta V, Clarisse M, Suter M, Tappy L. Energy and macronutrient intake after gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a 3-y observational study focused on protein consumption. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103(1):18–24.Google Scholar
- 11.Pinheiro ABV. Tabela para Avaliação de Consumo Alimentar em Medidas Caseiras, 5th edn. Atheneu; 2004.Google Scholar
- 12.Nutrition Coordinating Center. Nutrition data system for research software. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota; 2016.Google Scholar
- 13.Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Alimentação – UNICAMP. Tabela brasileira de composição de alimentos. 5th ed. Campinas: UNICAMP-NEPA; 2011. 161pGoogle Scholar
- 14.Center for agricultural and rural development. PC-SIDE software. Iowa State University; 2003.Google Scholar
- 19.Martens EA, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Protein diets, body weight loss and weight maintenance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17(1):75–9.Google Scholar
- 31.Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2005.Google Scholar