Obesity Surgery

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 1804–1808 | Cite as

Endoscopic Management of Eroded Bands Following Banded-Gastric Bypass (with Video)

  • Hany ShehabEmail author
  • Khaled Gawdat
Original Contributions



Banded-gastric bypass is a highly effective bariatric procedure, yet the possibility of band erosion remains a significant drawback. Surgical removal of eroded bands may be associated with significant morbidity. In this study, we assess the efficacy and safety of a solely peroral endoscopic approach for the management of eroded bands in patients with a banded-gastric bypass.

Materials and Methods

Starting January 2012, all patients with banded-gastric bypass and an eroded band were subjected to an attempt at peroral endoscopic removal using endoscopic scissors and/or argon plasma coagulation (APC), regardless of the circumference of band eroding inside the lumen.


Sixteen patients presented with eroded bands, 2 were deemed not amenable to endoscopic removal as only part of the thickness was eroded. Of the 14 patients where endoscopic attempts were performed, 12 (86%) were completely removed successfully, while 2 (14%) were cut but could not be extracted and only the intraluminal portion was trimmed. Complete resolution of symptoms occurred in 13 (93%) while in 1 patient (7%) there was partial improvement. Only one endoscopic session was performed per patient with a median time of 37.5 min per session (22–55 min). No complications were encountered.


Endoscopic removal of eroded gastric bands in patients with banded-gastric bypass is effective and safe in the majority of patients. When bands are adherent to the gastric wall, removal of the intraluminal portion of the band may lead to full or partial improvement of symptoms. Endoscopic band removal can be attempted even when a small part of band circumference has eroded.


Obesity Band erosion Eroded band Ring erosion Gastric bypass Surgery complications Banded–gastric bypass Endoscopic Bariatric 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material


(mp4 117 mb)


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016;315:2292–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gloy V, Briel M, Bhatt D, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;22:347–f5934.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    SAGES Guidelines Committee. SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laws HL, Piantadosi S. Superior gastric reduction procedure for morbid obesity: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1981;193:334–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fobi MA, Lee H. The surgical technique of Fobi-Pouch operation for obesity (the transected silastic vertical gastric bypass). Obes Surg. 1998;8:283–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rasera Jr I, Coelho TH, Ravelli MN, et al. A comparative, prospective and randomized evaluation of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the silastic ring: a 2-year follow up preliminary report on weight loss and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2016;26:762–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhandari M, Bhandari S, Mishra A, et al. Comparison between banded and nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 2-year follow-up: a preliminary retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:213–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Awad W, Garay A, Martínez C. Ten years experience of banded gastric bypass: does it make a difference? Obes Surg. 2012;22:271–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1536–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoon CI, Pak KH, Kim SM. Early experience with diagnosis and management of eroded gastric bands. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;82:18–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evans JA, Williams NN, Chan EP, et al. Endoscopic removal of eroded bands in vertical banded gastroplasty: a novel use of endoscopic scissors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:801–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karmali S, Snyder B, Wilson EB, et al. Endoscopic management of eroded prosthesis in vertical banded gastroplasty patients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:98–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chisholm J, Kitan N, Toouli J, et al. Gastric band erosion in 63 cases: endoscopic removal and rebanding evaluated. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1676–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taddeucci RJ, Madan AK, Ternovits CA, et al. Laparoscopic re-operations for band removal after open banded gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17:35–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blero D, Eisendrath P, Vandermeeren A, et al. Endoscopic removal of dysfunctioning bands or rings after restrictive bariatric procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:468–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gastroenterology DepartmentCairo University HospitalCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy UnitAirforce Specialized HospitalCairoEgypt
  3. 3.General and Bariatric Surgery DepartmentAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations