Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 1216–1220 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedure for Failed Gastric Banding and Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

  • Antonio IannelliEmail author
  • Anne Sophie Schneck
  • Emila Ragot
  • Arnaud Liagre
  • Yves Anduze
  • Simon Msika
  • Jean Gugenheim
Research Clinical



The problem of revision of failed gastric banding (GB) and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) procedures has become a common situation in bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been recently used to revise failed restrictive procedures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the results of LSG as revisional procedure for failed GB and VBG.


A prospective held database was questioned regarding patients' demographic, indication for revision, conversion to open surgery, morbidity, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), evolution of comorbidities, and need for a second procedure after LSG.


Forty-one patients, 34 women and seven men with a mean age of 42 years (range 19 to 63 years) and a mean body mass index at 49.9 kg/m2 (range 35.9–63 kg/m2), underwent laparoscopic conversion of GB (36 patients) and VBG (five patients) into LSG. Indication for revisional surgery was insufficient weight loss in all the cases. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. There was no mortality and five patients (12.2%) developed complications (high leak, one patient; intra-abdominal abscess, three patients; and complicated incisional hernia, one patient). At a mean follow-up of 13.4 months, %EWL is on average 42.7% (range 4–76.1%). Six patients had a second procedure (four had laparoscopic duodenal switch, one had laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and one had laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion).


Conversion of GB and VBG into LSG is feasible and safe. LSG is effective in the short term with a mean %EWL of 42.7% at 13.4 months. Long-term results of LSG as revisional procedure are awaited to establish its efficacy in the long term.


Obesity Laparoscopy Sleeve gastrectomy Weight loss 


  1. 1.
    Peeters A, O'Brien PE, Laurie C, et al. Substantial intentional weight loss and mortality in the severely obese. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1028–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muller MK, Attigah N, Wildi S, et al. High secondary failure rate of rebanding after failed gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2007;22:448–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morino M, Toppino M, Bonnet G, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding versus vertical banded gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:835–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Gemert WG, Van Wersch MM, Greve JMW, et al. Revisional surgery after vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 1998;8:21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber M, Müller MK, Michel JM, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding. Ann Surg. 2003;238:827–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iannelli A, Amato D, Addeo P, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty (Mason MacLean) into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iannelli A, Addeo P, Dahman M, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty with an antireflux wrap into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17:901–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernante P, Foletto M, Busetto L, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Feasibility and technique of laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krawczykowski D, Lecko M, Nore O. Preliminary results with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Chir Gastroenterol. 2005;21(suppl 1):26–30.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M. The first international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25–27, 2007. Obes Surg. 2008;18:487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gagner M, Gumbs AA. Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1931–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lederfein D, Fichman S, Bernstine H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with minimal morbidity early results in 120 morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1567–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tucker O, Sucandy I, Szomstein S, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:740–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Wierlemann A, et al. Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures? Surg Endosc. 2009;23:334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iannelli A, Dainese R, Piche T, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:821–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iannelli A, Dahman M, Facchiano E, et al. A simple technique for laparoscopic removal of silicone adjustable gastric banding. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16:301–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baltasar A. Modified vertical banded gastroplasty. Technique with vertical division and serosal patch. Acta Chir Scand. 1989;155:107–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sánchez-Pernaute A, Pérez-Aguirre E, Talavera P, et al. Mucocele of the gastric tube after conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to duodenal switch: not just a radiological image. Obes Surg. 2006;16:524–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gagner M, Boza C. Laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006;3:105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Dahman M, Negri C, Gugenheim J. Two-step laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2009;in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Iannelli
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Anne Sophie Schneck
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Emila Ragot
    • 4
  • Arnaud Liagre
    • 5
  • Yves Anduze
    • 5
  • Simon Msika
    • 4
  • Jean Gugenheim
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation HépatiqueHôpital Archet 2NiceFrance
  2. 2.Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Pôle DigestifNiceFrance
  3. 3.Faculté de MédecineUniversité de Nice–Sophia–AntipolisNiceFrance
  4. 4.Service de Chirurgie Générale et DigestiveHôpital Louis MourierColombes CedexFrance
  5. 5.Service de Chirurgie DigestiveClinique des CèdresCornebarrieuFrance

Personalised recommendations