Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 1190–1194 | Cite as

Complications of Gastric Bypass: Avoiding the Roux-en-O Configuration

  • Vadim ShermanEmail author
  • Adrian G. Dan
  • Jeffrey M. Lord
  • Bipan Chand
  • Philip R. Schauer
Clinical Report



Atypical complications of gastric bypass surgery include the Roux-en-O configuration: an improper connection of the bilio-pancreatic limb to the gastric pouch.


Four cases of Roux-en-O, which occurred at institutions not affiliated with the authors, were reviewed for issues related to causation and patient outcomes.


One case was diagnosed intraoperatively (patient 1), while the time of diagnosis in the remaining three patients was postoperative days 2, 52, and 230 (patients 2–4). The delay resulted in two computed tomography scans, two endoscopies, and four contrast studies per patient. These patients presented with protracted biliary emesis and a clinical picture of bowel obstruction. Irrespective of time to diagnosis, all patients endured significant postoperative sequelae—numerous surgeries (n = 10, 3, 1, and 3, respectively) and increased length of stay (97, 86, 49, and 125 days, respectively). Patients 2 and 3 were diagnosed by repeat laparotomy, and patient 4 was diagnosed by HIDA scan.


Nevertheless, surgery remains the most effective means by which to diagnose the problem, as well as correct the complication. Maneuvers that should be employed to prevent this rare complication include keeping the bilio-pancreatic limb short, identifying the ligament of Treitz and marking the Roux limb shortly after jejunal transection.


Bariatric surgery Complications 


  1. 1.
    Ali MR, Fuller WD, Choi MP, et al. Bariatric surgical outcomes. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(4):835–52. vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1145–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitchell MT, Pizzitola VJ, Knuttinen MG, et al. Atypical complications of gastric bypass surgery. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(3):366–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schrope BA, Daud A, Bessler M. Unintentional creation of reverse peristaltic alimentary limb during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(4):478–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carucci LR, Turner MA. Radiologic evaluation following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(3):353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koven IH, Greyson D, Newman A, et al. Radionuclide test for gastric bile reflux. Can J Surg. 1978;21(5):422–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmidt GF, Schneider JA, Bauer H, et al. Measurement of duodenogastric reflux with 99mTc-HIDA in duodenal ulcer patients. World J Surg. 1982;6:98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vadim Sherman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adrian G. Dan
    • 2
  • Jeffrey M. Lord
    • 3
  • Bipan Chand
    • 4
  • Philip R. Schauer
    • 4
  1. 1.Comprehensive Bariatric Surgery CenterBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Summa Health SystemAkronUSA
  3. 3.Sacred Heart Health SystemPensacolaUSA
  4. 4.Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations