Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 131–133 | Cite as

Reply to Letter: Agreed: “PRAM May be Useful to Assess the Cardiovascular Changes in Obese Patients During Laparoscopy”

  • Donald P. BernsteinEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 45 Downloads

To the Editor:

I thank Dr. Forfori et al. for their critique of my commentary [1], but certain statements presented by them as fact must be clarified. First, notwithstanding an inherent reproducibility error of ±15–20% [2], pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) provides mean values at normal cardiac indices that agree with other reference standards. Fact: thermodilution is still the clinical gold-standard which all pretenders of equivalence must mimic. Other methods, if to be accepted as an equivalent or replacement for TDCO, must provide a small bias and reproducibility error, and limits of agreement within ±30%. In the face of this, Forfori et al. trivialize the studies of Nguyen et al. [3] and Artuso et al. [4], which both used TDCO as their test method to determine CO and the derived indices of cardiac index (CI) stroke volume SV, stroke index (SI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and SVRI. Alleging equivalence to TDCO, the authors emphasize that their...

Keywords

Sevoflurane Cardiac Index Systemic Vascular Resistance Stroke Index Impedance Cardiography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernstein DP. Pressure pulse contour-derived stroke volume and cardiac output in the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1015–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Fleming NW, et al. Cardiac function during laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Artuso D, Wayne M, Cassaro S, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures. Arch Surg. 2005;140:289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dumont L, Mattys M, Mardirosoff C, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 1997;7:326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balderi T, Forfori F, Marra V, et al. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring during laparoscopic gastric bypass in superobese patients by pressure recording analytical method. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1007–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prior DL, Sprung J, Thomas JD, et al. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic evaluation of cardiovascular performance during laparoscopy of morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2003;13:761–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perilli V, Sollazzi C, Modesti MD, et al. Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure with reverse Trendelenburg position in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary gas exchange. Obes Surg. 2003;13:605–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aloni Y, Evron S, Ezri T, et al. Morbidly obese patients are hemodynamically stable during laparoscopic surgery: a thoracic bioimpedance study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:261–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Dawlatly AA. Hemodynamic profile during laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery: the impact of morbid obesity. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007;19:51–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chukwu EO, Barasch E, Mihalatos DG, et al. Relative importance of errors in left ventricular quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography: insights from three-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:990–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Chan J, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with sequential magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction over time in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:300–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhl HP, Franke A, Janssens U, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and function by multi-plane transesophageal transducer: dynamic in vitro validation and in vivo comparison with angiography and thermodilution. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:1113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith MD, MacPhail B, Harrison MR, et al. Value and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins S, Girard F, Boudreault D, et al. Esophageal Doppler and thermodilution are not interchangeable for determination of cardiac output. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:978–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boucaud C, Bouffard Y, Dumortier J, et al. Transoesophageal echo-Doppler vs. thermodilution cardiac output measurement during hepatic vascular exclusion in liver transplantation. Eur J Anaesthiol. 2008;25:485–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown CV, Martin MJ, Shoemaker WC, et al. The effect of obesity on bioimpedance cardiac index. Am J Surg. 2005;189:547–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Engoren M, Barbee D. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14:40–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Royse CJ, Liew DF, Wright CE, et al. Persistent depression of contractility and vasodilation with propofol but not with Sevoflurane of desflurane in rabbits. Anesthesiology 2008;108:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mikami O, Fujise K, Matsumoto S, et al. High intra-abdominal pressure increases plasma catecholamine concentrations during pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic procedures. Arch Surg. 1998;133:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Palomar Medical Center and the Palomar-Pomerado Research InstitutePalomar Medical CenterEscondidoUSA
  2. 2.Rancho Santa FeUSA

Personalised recommendations