Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 1697–1701 | Cite as

Low Mortality in Bariatric Surgery 1995 Through 2005 in Sweden, in Spite of a Shift to More Complex Procedures

  • Magnus Sundbom
  • Britt-Marie Karlson
Research Article

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery is expanding worldwide. In a previous study, we found a threefold increase in the annual incidence in Sweden between 1987 and 1996. The aim of the present study was to describe the nationwide practice of bariatric surgery until 2005 and determine the perioperative mortality.

Methods

All bariatric procedures were identified through linkage to the Swedish Inpatient Registry, kept by the National Board of Health and Welfare. Mortality data were obtained from the Swedish National Death Registry

Results

A total of 8,129 bariatric procedures were identified. Seventy-eight percent of the patients were women and the mean age was 40.3 years. Hospital stay averaged 6 days. There was a 27% increase in the number of procedures performed in 2005 compared to 1995. After a decline in the beginning of the century, an increase of 119% is noted from 2001 to 2005. In the beginning of the study period, simple gastric restrictive procedures dominated (79%), but these procedures declined gradually. Gastric bypass has had the opposite development and reached 79% of all performed bariatric procedures in 2005. Laparoscopy has been introduced under the study period and in 2005, 42% of all gastric bypasses were performed by laparoscopy. The 30-day mortality was 0.16%.

Conclusion

In spite of the shift to more complex procedures, the operative mortality was low.

Keywords

Obesity Bariatric surgery Mortality Gastric bypass 

References

  1. 1.
    Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289:76–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 1999;282:1523–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trus TL, Pope GD, Finlayson SR. National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2005;19:616–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005;294:1909–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pope GD, Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:855–60. discussion 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leffler E, Gustavsson S, Karlson BM. Time trends in obesity surgery 1987 through 1996 in Sweden–a population-based study. Obes Surg 2000;10:543–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Swedish obese subjects study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2007;357:753–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peeters A, O'Brien PE, Laurie C, et al. Substantial intentional weight loss and mortality in the severely obese. Ann Surg 2007;246:1028–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morino M, Toppino M, Forestieri P, et al. Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. N Ann Surg 2007;246:1002–7. discussion 1007–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Rourke RW, Andrus J, Diggs BS, et al. Perioperative morbidity associated with bariatric surgery: an academic center experience. Arch Surg 2006;141:262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Omalu BI, Ives DG, Buhari AM, et al. Death rates and causes of death after bariatric surgery for Pennsylvania residents, 1995 to 2004. Arch Surg 2007;142:923–8. discussion 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ballantyne GH, Belsley S, Stephens D, et al. Bariatric surgery: low mortality at a high-volume center. Obes Surg 2008;18:660–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gagner M, Milone L, Yung E, et al. Causes of early mortality after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:664–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Bariatric surgery outcomes in morbidly obese with the metabolic syndrome at US academic centers. Obes Surg. 2008 Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Basdevant A, Paita M, Rodde-Dunet MH, et al. A nationwide survey on bariatric surgery in France: two years prospective follow-up. Obes Surg 2007;17:39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Fayad C, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:248–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Papasavas PK, Gagné DJ, Kelly J, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass is a safe and effective operation for the treatment of morbid obesity in patients older than 55 years. Obes Surg 2004;14:1056–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, et al. Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2002;235:640–5. discussion 645–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 1994;4:353–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nilsson AC, Spetz CL, Carsjö K, et al. Reliability of the hospital registry. The diagnostic data are better than their reputation. Läkartidningen 1994;91:598–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Naessén T, Parker R, Persson I, et al. Time trends in incidence rates of first hip fracture in the Uppsala Health Care Region, Sweden, 1965–1983. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:289–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Samuel I, Mason EE, Renquist KE, et al. Bariatric surgery trends: an 18-year report from the International Bariatric Surgery Registry. Am J Surg 2006;192:657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg 2004;240:586–93. discussion 593–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2007;142:621–32. discussion 632–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JA, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005;294:1903–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murr MM, Martin T, Haines K, et al. A state-wide review of contemporary outcomes of gastric bypass in Florida: does provider volume impact outcomes? Ann Surg 2007;245:699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lopez J, Sung J, Anderson W, et al. Is bariatric surgery safe in academic centers? Am Surg 2002;68:820–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital of UppsalaUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations