Chickpea protein isolate was hydrolyzed batchwise using Alcalase as an endopeptidase and Flavourzyme as an exopeptidase, by either individual or sequential treatment. Secondary structure, SDS-PAGE molecular weight profile, functional properties, and antioxidant activity of the hydrolysates were investigated. Alcalase was more effective than Flavourzyme to cleave the peptide bonds, and the degree of hydrolysis (DH) of Alcalase-treated hydrolysate was 25.8% compared to Flavourzyme-treated counterpart with a DH of 11.9%. Sequential treatment increased the DH up to 50%. The hydrolysis process significantly changed the protein’s secondary structure characterized by decreased ordered structures and increased disordered structures. The more notable changes occurred for those that were treated sequentially. Protein banding patterns of the hydrolysates were also markedly changed, especially for those treated by Alcalase in which no visible band was observed. Furthermore, hydrolysates had a significant (P < 0.05) increase in the solubility, emulsifying capacity, and DPPH· scavenging capacity. The changes in DH and protein secondary structure significantly correlated with functional properties and DPPH· scavenging capacity. DH presented a significant inverse association with emulsifying stability (r = − 0.940), but a positive correlation with DPPH· scavenging activity (r = 0.951). β-sheet was found to be negatively correlated with both solubility (r = − 0.979) and DPPH· scavenging activity (r = − 0.979). However, an opposite trend was observed for β-turn which positively correlated with both solubility (r = 0.881) and DPPH· scavenging activity (r = − 0.909). The results reveal that hydrolysis enhanced the functional properties and antioxidant activity of chickpea protein which may be beneficial for potential functional food ingredient applications.
Chickpea protein Enzymatic hydrolysis Secondary structure Protein profile Functional properties Antioxidant properties
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Funding was provided through the USDA Evans-Allen program and the research was conducted at Virginia State University Agricultural Research Station (Journal Series number 361).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.