Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 3340–3348 | Cite as

Assessing the influence of vegetal protein source on the physicochemical properties of maize flour

  • Ángela Bravo-NúñezEmail author
  • Manuel Gómez
Original Paper


There has been an increasing interest in developing protein-enriched cereal products of recent. The quality of these products will depend on interactions between proteins and starch presented in the flours. The present study aimed to study the influence of the substitution of maize flour by 25 or 50% of proteins (potato, rice, pea or hydrolyzed gluten). Hydration, pasting, thermal, rheological and textural properties of the flour and mixtures were analyzed. Hydration properties were enhanced by the presence of rice or pea proteins, being the increase more evident when higher the protein content. All flour–protein samples modified pasting profiles, decreasing overall viscosity but increasing gelatinization temperature. Among the different flour–protein samples, those with pea protein presented higher values for hydration, pasting, and rheological parameters. Mixtures with hydrolyzed gluten protein presented the lowest values for both viscoelastic moduli and hardness. Mixtures with potato protein presented the lowest values for hydration properties, but gave the highest hardness among flour–protein gels.


Maize flour Rheology Pasting properties Proteins 



The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project AGL2014-52928-C2-2-R) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). Ángela Bravo-Núñez would like to acknowledge the University of Valladolid for her pre-doctoral scholarship.


  1. 1.
    C. Nowson, S. O’Connell, Protein requirements and recommendations for older people: a review. Nutrients. 7(8), 6874–6899 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Thomas, K.A. Erdman, L.M. Burke, Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 48(3), 543–568 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.L. Halton, F.B. Hu, The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 23(5), 373–385 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FAOSTAT. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (Internet). 2016 (Cited 4 Jul 2016).
  5. 5.
    C.E. Chinma, C.C. Ariahu, J.O. Abu, Chemical composition, functional and pasting properties of cassava starch and soy protein concentrate blends. J Food Sci Technol. 50(6), 1179–1185 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Colombo, A.E. León, P.D. Ribotta, Rheological and calorimetric properties of corn-, wheat-, and cassava-starches and soybean protein concentrate composites. Starch 63(2), 83–95 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.Y. Li, A.I. Yeh, K.L. Fan, Gelation characteristics and morphology of corn starch/soy protein concentrate composites during heating. J Food Eng. 78(4), 1240–1247 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.D. Ribotta, C.M. Rosell, Effects of enzymatic modification of soybean protein on the pasting and rheological profile of starch-protein systems. Starch 62(7), 373–383 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.D. Ribotta, A. Colombo, C.M. Rosell, Enzymatic modifications of pea protein and its application in protein-cassava and corn starch gels. Food Hydrocoll. 27(1), 185–190 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Oñate Narciso, C. Brennan, Whey and pea protein fortification of rice starches: effects on protein and starch digestibility and starch pasting properties. Starch 70(9–10), 1700315 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Joshi, P. Aldred, J.F. Panozzo, S. Kasapis, B. Adhikari, Rheological and microstructural characteristics of lentil starch-lentil protein composite pastes and gels. Food Hydrocoll. 35, 226–237 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Q. Sun, C.S.L. Xiong, Functional and pasting properties of pea starch and peanut protein isolate blends. Carbohydr Polym. 101(1), 1134–1139 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Chen, B. Zhang, M.N. Li, Y. Xie, H.Q. Chen, Effects of glutenin and gliadin modified by protein-glutaminase on pasting, rheological properties and microstructure of potato starch. Food Chem. 253, 148–155 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Yi, M. Jie, L. Dong, W. Li-jun, A. Benu, X.D. Chen, Effect of addition of antioxidant flaxseed polypeptide on the rheological properties of native maize starch. Int J Food Eng. 13(9), 20160397 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Jekle, K. Mühlberger, T. Becker, Starch–gluten interactions during gelatinization and its functionality in dough like model systems. Food Hydrocoll. 54, 196–201 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Á. Bravo-Núñez, M. Gómez, Physicochemical properties of native and extruded maize flours in the presence of animal proteins. J Food Eng. 243, 49–56 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    AACC, Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemist, 11th edn method 61-02.01 (pasting properties), 56.30 (water binding capacity) (American Associaton of Food Chemists, St. Paul, 2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Damodaran S (2008) Amino acids, peptides and proteins. In: Damodaran S, Parkin KL, Kilk L, Fennema OR (eds) Fennema’s Food Chemistry, 4th edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Shin, D.O. Gang, J.Y. Song, Effects of protein and transglutaminase on the preparation of gluten-free rice bread. Food Sci Biotechnol. 19(4), 951–956 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Gelencsér, R. Juhász, M. Hódsági, S. Gergely, A. Salgó, Comparative study of native and resistant starches. Acta Aliment. 37, 255–270 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.C. Eliasson, Differential scanning calorimetry studies on wheat starch—gluten mixtures. I. Effect of gluten on the gelatinization of wheat starch. J Cereal Sci. 1(3), 199–205 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C.I. Onwulata, M.H. Tunick, A.E. Thomas-Gahring, Pasting and extrusion properties of mixed carbohydrate and whey protein isolate matrices. J Food Process Preserv. 38(4), 1577–1591 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Ghumman, A. Kaur, N. Singh, Functionality and digestibility of albumins and globulins from lentil and horse gram and their effect on starch rheology. Food Hydrocoll. 61, 843–850 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L.L. Chedid, J.L. Kokini, Influence of protein addition on rheological properties of amylose- and amylopectine-based starchesin excess water. Cereal Chem. 69, 551–555 (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P.R. Shewry, N.G. Halford, Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. J Exp Bot. 53(370), 947–958 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.W. Lawton, C.M. Wilson, Proteins of the kernel, in Corn: Chemistry and Technology, ed. by P.J. White, L.A. Johnson (American Associaton of Food Chemists, St. Paul, 2003), pp. 313–354Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. Crévieu, B. Carré, A.M. Chagneau, J. Guéguen, J.P. Melcion, Effect of particle size of pea (Pisum sativum L) flours on the digestion of their proteins in the digestive tract of broilers. J Sci Food Agric. 75(2), 217–226 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Jung, P.A. Murphy, L.A. Johnson, Physicochemical and functional properties of soy protein substrates modified by low levels of protease hydrolysis. J Food Sci. 70(2), C180–C187 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L.A. Arogundade, T.H. Mu, M.C. Añón, Heat-induced gelation properties of isoelectric and ultrafiltered sweet potato protein isolate and their gel microstructure. Food Res Int. 49(1), 216–225 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    I.L. Batey, M.L. Bason, Definitions, in The RVA Handbook, ed. by G.B. Crosbie, A.S. Ross (American Association of Food Chemists, St. Paul, 2007), pp. 138–140Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.W. Donovan, C.J. Mapes, Multiple phase transitions of starches and Nägeli amylodextrins. Starch 32(6), 190–193 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. LeCorre, J. Bras, A. Dufresne, Influence of native starch’s properties on starch nanocrystals thermal properties. Carbohydr Polym. 87, 658–666 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.D. Ferry, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1980)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    I. Rosalina, M. Bhattacharya, Dynamic rheological measurements and analysis of starch gels. Carbohydr Polym. 48(2), 191–202 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    V.Y. Grinberg, V.B. Tolstoguzov, Thermodynamic incompatibility of proteins and polysaccharides in solutions. Food Hydrocoll. 11(2), 145–158 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D. Panyam, A. Kilara, Enhancing the functionality of food proteins by enzymatic modification. Trends Food Sci Technol. 7(4), 120–125 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.G.B. Wouters, I. Rombouts, E. Fierens, K. Brijs, J.A. Delcour, Relevance of the functional properties of enzymatic plant protein hydrolysates in food systems. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 15(4), 786–800 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    P.D. Ribotta, A. Colombo, A.E. León, M.C. Añón, Effects of soy protein on physical and rheological properties of wheat starch. Starch 59(12), 614–623 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M.-C. Ralet, J. Guéguen, Fractionation of potato proteins: solubility, thermal coagulation and emulsifying properties. LWT Food Sci Technol. 33(5), 380–387 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    G.A. Van Koningsveld, H. Gruppen, H.H.J. De Jongh, G. Wijngaards, M.A.J.S. Van Boekel, P. Walstra et al., The solubility of potato proteins from industrial potato fruit juice as influenced by pH and various additives. J Sci Food Agric. 82(1), 134–142 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Food Technology Area, College of Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of ValladolidPalenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations