Advertisement

Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 2389–2397 | Cite as

Quality assessment of Indian rice varieties, evaluation of its relationship with their Glycemic index

  • Pooja Dutt
  • Mojeer Hasan
  • Mohammad Shaququzzaman
  • Bibhu Prasad PandaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

The preference for a particular rice quality trait varies regionally, with the shift of choice towards better quality varieties. The qualitative properties namely amylose content, gelatinization temperature, hardness and Glycaemic Index (GI) were studied. Eight rice varieties (Basmati, Non-Basmati, Parboiled) 1121 Mini Sella Mogra (1121 MSM), Mini Sella Mogra (MSM), Noorjahan Basmati (NB), White Sella Dubar (WSD), Golden Sella (GS), Parmal Sella (PSe), Parmal Silky (PSi), Hari Bhari Parmal Sella (HBPS) were selected. Amylose content were highest in WSD (41 ± 0.05%) and PSe (40.99 ± 0.02%). Onset temperature during gelatinization was high in NB (98.28 ± 0.28 °C) and PSe (95.54 ± 0.47 °C). PSe showed the highest positive cycle peak in texture profile analysis (hardness 3900 ± 41 g) while least in PSi (1300.09 ± 0.64 g). GI was lowest of WSD and PSe (GI ~ 41). A positive correlation was found between amylose content, hardness and gelatinization temperature, which inversely related to GI. Principal Composition Analysis (PCA) has generated PC1 (55.68%) and PC2 (26.26%), the two principal components describing total 82.12% of data distribution. The Agglomerative hierarchical clustering divided all the samples into three clusters (C1–C3), based on percentage contribution. PSe was found to be best with high amylose percentage (40.99 ± 0.02%), high onset gelatinization temperature (95.54 ± 0.47 °C), maximum hardness (3900 ± 41 g) and low GI (GI ~ 41).

Keywords

Rice Glycemic index Amylose Gelatinization Texture profile Principal composition analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank University Grants Commission, Department of Science & Technology, Government of India, for grant of fellowship and Infrastructural grant under FIST & PURSE scheme.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Human and animal testing is not applicable in our study.

Supplementary material

11694_2019_159_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 kb)
11694_2019_159_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary file2 (DOCX 12 kb)
11694_2019_159_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary file3 (DOCX 13 kb)
11694_2019_159_MOESM4_ESM.tif (697 kb)
Supplementary file4 (TIFF 688 kb)
11694_2019_159_MOESM5_ESM.tif (615 kb)
Supplementary file5 (TIFF 606 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    G. Anis et al., QTL analysis for rice seedlings under nitrogen deficiency using chromosomal segment substitution lines. Pak. J. Bot. 50, 537–544 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Ceylan et al., Consumer preferences of organic products for Romania. Int. J. Agric. Life Sci. 2, 47–55 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Vongsawasdi et al., Relationships between rheological properties of rice flour and quality of vermicelli. AJOFAI. 2, 102–109 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.J. Zhu et al., Underlying reasons for waxy rice flours having different pasting properties. Food Chem. 120, 94–100 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Sasaki et al., Effect of amylose content on gelatinization, retrogradation, and pasting properties of starches from waxy and nonwaxy wheat and their F1 seeds. Cereal Chem. 77, 58–63 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Hug-Iten et al., Staling of bread: Role of amylose and amylopectin and influence of starch-degrading enzymes. Cereal Chem. 80, 654–661 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.M. Behall, D.J. Scholfield, Food amylose content affects postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Cereal Chem. 82, 654–659 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Copeland et al., Form and functionality of starch. Food Hydrocoll. 23, 1527–1534 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Cooke, M.J. Gidley, Loss of crystalline and molecular order during starch gelatinisation: origin of the enthalpic transition. Carbohydr. Res. 227, 103–112 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.C. Liu et al., Mechanism of Degradation of Starch, a Highly Branched Polymer, during Extrusion. Macromolecules 43, 2855–2864 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Li et al., The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structure for textural properties of cooked rice grains. Food Chem. 196, 702–711 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Patindol et al., Chemometric analysis of cooked rice texture in relation to starch fine structure and leaching characteristics. Starch Starke 62, 188–197 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Ramesh et al., Structure of rice starch and its relation to cooked-rice texture. Carbohydr. Poly. 38, 337–347 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.T. Champagne et al., Effects of postharvest processing on texture profile analysis of cooked rice. Cereal Chem. 75, 181–186 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Leelayuthsoontorn, A. Thipayarat, Textural and morphological changes of Jasmine rice under various elevated cooking conditions. Food Chem. 96, 606–613 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Juliano et al., Amylose and protein contents of milled rice as eating quality factors. Philipp. Agric 56, 44–47 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.J. Jenkins et al., Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease. Am. J. Clin Nutr. 76, 266S–273S (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F.S. Atkinson et al., International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care 31, 2281–2283 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.F. Tester et al., Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J. Cereal Sci. 39, 151–165 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Khatoon, A. Gopalakrishna, Fat-soluble nutraceuticals and fatty acid composition of selected Indian rice varieties. JAOCS 81, 939–943 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Wang, L. Copeland, Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: a review. Food Funct. 4, 1564–1580 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Calingacion et al., Diversity of global rice markets and the science required for consumer-targeted rice breeding. PLoS ONE 9, e85106 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Santhi, T.P. Vijayakumar, Physical and functional characteristics of milling fractions of Indian Kavun pigmented brown rice (Oryza sativa L.). IJAFST 4, 78–83 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    U. Ravi et al., Quality analysis of indigenous organic Asian Indian rice variety-Salem Samba. IJTK 11(1), 114–122 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.K. Reddy, M. Bhotmange, Isolation of starch from rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its morphological study using scanning electron microscopy. IJAFST 4, 859–866 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R.C. Kaufman et al., Development of a 96-well plate iodine binding assay for amylose content determination. Carbohydr. Polym. 115, 444–447 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.S. Hager et al., Starch properties, in vitro digestibility and sensory evaluation of fresh egg pasta produced from oat, teff and wheat flour. J. Cereal Sci. 58, 156–163 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Wolter et al., In vitro starch digestibility and predicted glycaemic indexes of buckwheat, oat, quinoa, sorghum, teff and commercial gluten-free bread. J. Cereal Sci. 58, 431–436 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Perry, Starch granule size and the domestication of manioc (Manihot esculenta) and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Econ. Bot. 56, 335–349 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    C.S. Brennan, C.M. Tudorica, Evaluation of potential mechanisms by which dietary fibre additions reduce the predicted glycaemic index of fresh pastas. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 43, 2151–2162 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    V.D. Capriles, J.A. Areas, Effects of prebiotic inulin-type fructans on structure, quality, sensory acceptance and glycemic response of gluten-free breads. Food Funct. 4, 104–110 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Zhu et al., Comparison of amylose determination methods and the development of a dual wavelength iodine binding technique. Cereal Chem. 85, 51–58 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    B.O. Juliano et al., International cooperative comparison of instrument methods for cooked rice texture. J. Texture Stud. 12, 17–38 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    G.E. Vandeputte, J.A. Delcour, From sucrose to starch granule to starch physical behaviour: a focus on rice starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 58, 245–266 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A.A. Wani et al., Physico-chemical, thermal and rheological properties of starches isolated from newly released rice cultivars grown in Indian temperate climates. Lwt Food Sci. Technol. 53, 176–183 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Dhital et al., Physicochemical and structural properties of maize and potato starches as a function of granule size. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 10151–10161 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Brezmes et al., Neural network based electronic nose for the classification of aromatic species. Anal. Chim. Acta. 348, 503–509 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pooja Dutt
    • 1
  • Mojeer Hasan
    • 1
  • Mohammad Shaququzzaman
    • 2
  • Bibhu Prasad Panda
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Microbial and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Research and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Education and ResearchJamia HamdardNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Education and ResearchJamia HamdardNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations