Advertisement

Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 1935–1946 | Cite as

Relationship between quality characteristics and skin color of ‘Fuji’ Apples (Malus domestica Borkh.)

  • Kyung-Hyung KuEmail author
  • Hyo-Jin Kim
  • Moon-Cheol Jeong
Review Paper
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between apple skin color and internal quality characteristics, such as the concentration of functional compounds, physicochemical and textural properties. The skin color of ‘Fuji’ apples (N = 420) was determined and the apples were categorized into three classes (class A, N = 231; class B, N = 130; class C, N = 59). The apple skin color values correlated significantly with flesh color intensity. For sensory attributes, the yellow color intensity of apple flesh had a positive correlation with redness (a*, r = 0.781) and ΔE(r = 0.787) of apple flesh color (r = 0.787). There was strong correlation between a*, and the chemical properties of apple flesh. Apple skin color (a*) was positively correlated with total juice content (r = 0.784), soluble solid contents (r = 0.626), soluble solid contents/total acidity (r = 0.697), fructose (r = 0.444), sorbitol (r = 0.476), and sucrose concentrations (r = 0.823), respectively. However, malic acid (r = − 0.525), shikimic acid (r = − 0.443), and total organic acid concentrations (r = − 0.519) correlated negatively with a*. The a* value also showed positive correlations with phenol and anthocyanidine concentrations, but a negative correlation with DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS concentrations. A principal component analysis was performed to analyze functional compounds, sensory attributes, and physicochemical properties of apple skin and flesh; the total variance was 91.31% (F1; 58.92%, F2: 32.39%), 84.55% (F1;50.86%, F2;33.69%), 90.37% (F1;75.74%, F2; 14.63%) and 57.20% (F1;41.92%, F2;15.28%), respectively. Our results confirmed a strong correlation between the ΔE and a*, which are indicative of the skin color and the internal quality measures of the Fuji apple. Thus, the skin color of Fuji apples seems to be a reliable index of internal fruit quality.

Keywords

Fuji apple Skin color Physicochemical properties Internal fruit quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E0187301-01, E0132200-05) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT.

References

  1. 1.
    K.H. KU, E.J. Choi, S.S. Kim, M.C. Jeong, Quality characteristics and sensory evaluation of Fuji apple based on commodity price. Korean J. Food Preserv. 27, 1065–1073 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) Statistics of agricultural product amount. (MAFRA, 2016), http://lib.mafra.go.kr. Accessed 2 Jan 2016
  3. 3.
    Y.H. Choi, S.J. Lee, A survey on uses, preference and recognition of apple. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult. 20, 204–213 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.W. Park, J.Y. Yoon, Y.H. Kim, S.A. Lee, H.S. Cha, Korean J. Food Preserv. 14, 105–108 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.E. Saltveit, Effect of ethylene on equality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15, 279–292 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.J. Richards, P.M. Patterson, Effect of ethylene on equality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 29, 10–23 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.R. Harker, F.A. Gunson, S.R. Jaeger, The case for fruit quality; an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28, 333–347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z.H. Li, H. Gemma, S. Iwahori, Stimulation of Fuji apple skin color by ethepone and phosphorus-calcium mixed compounds in relation to flavonoid synthesis. Sci. Hortic. 94, 193–199 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.P. Kim, M.S. Park, Consumer preferences for fruit size and their implication. Korean J. Food Mark. Econ. 24, 26–39 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Kajikwa, Quality level and price in Japanese apple market. Agribusiness. 14, 227–234 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Kim, Y.H. Kim, J.H. Park, An analysis on the change of consumer’s fruit purchasing behavior. J Rural Dev. 27, 55–66 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.D. Cho, D.M. Kim, G.H. Kim, Survey on consumer perceptions of the sensory quality attributes of apple. Korean J. Food Preserv. 15, 810–815 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Merwe, M. Muller, M. Rijst, L.F. Labushangene, T. Næs, W.J. Steyn, Impact of appearance on degree of liking and eating quality expectations of selected apple cultivars. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50, 492–499 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Seppa, J. Railio, K. Vehkalahti, R. Tahvonen, H. Tuorila, Hedonic response and individual definitions if an ideal apple as predictors of choice. J. Sens Stu. 28, 346–356 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Bonany, A. Buehler, J. Carbo, S. Codarin, F. Donati, G. Echeverria, S. Egger, W. Guerra, C. Hilaire, I. Holler, I. Iglesias, K. Jesionkowska, D. Konopacka, D. Kruczynask, A. Matinelli, T. Pitior, S. Sansavini, R. Stehr, F. Schoorl, Consumer eating quality acceptance of new apple varieties in different European countries. Food Qual. Prefer. 30, 250–259 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Yuan, J. Cai, L. Sun, E. Han, T. Ernest, Nondestructive measurement of soluble solids content in apples by a portable fruit analyzer. Food Anal. Methods 9, 785–794 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Dong, W. Guo, Nondestructive determination of apple internal qualities using Near-Infrared hyperspectral reflectance imaging. Food Anal. Methods 8, 2635–2646 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Eisenstecken, A. Panarese, P. Robatscher, C.W. Huck, A. Zanella, M. Oberhuber, A near infrared spectroscopy and chemometric approach to improve apple fruit quality management; A case study on the cultivars Cripps pink and Braeburn. Molecules. 20, 13603–13619 (2015)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.B. Hutchings, Food Colour and Appearance, 1st edn. (Blackie Academic & Professional, Cambridge, 1994), pp. 217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.L. Corollaro, I. Endrizzi, A. Bertolini, E. Aprea, M.L. .Dematte, F. Costa, F. Biasioli, F. Gasperi, F, Sensory profiling of apple: methodological aspects, cultivar characterization and postharvest changes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 77, 111–120 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H.Y. Jung, S.S. Kim, Identification of ideal size and drivers for consumer acceptability of apple. Korean J. Food Preserv. 21, 618–626 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Singleton, J.A. Rossi, Colorimetry of total phenolic with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16, 144–158 (1965)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Ceymann, E. Arrigoni, H. Scharer, A.B. Nising, R.F. Herrell, Identification of apples rich in health-promoting flavan-3-ols and phenolic acids by measuring the polyphenol profile. J. Food Compos. Anal. 26, 128–135 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.B. Arnao, A. Cano, M. Acosta, The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 73, 239–244 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Thaipon, U. Boonprakob, K. Crosby, L. Cisneros-Zevallos, D. Hawkins, Byne, Original article: comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. Food Compos. Anal. 19, 669–675 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. Brand-Willams, M. Cuvelier, C.L. Berset, Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 28, 25–30 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    I.F.F. Benzie, J.J. Stain, The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of ‘antioxidant powder’ the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 239, 70–76 (1996)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Bechar, A. Mizrach, P. Barreiro, S. Landahl, Determination of mealiness in apples using ultrasonic measurements. Biosyst. Eng. 91, 329–334 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Ozturk, K. Yildiz, Y. Ozkan, Effects of pre-harvest methyl jasmonate treatments on bioactive compounds and peel color development of ‘Fuji’ Apples. Int. J. Food Prop. 18, 954–962 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Gouws, W.J. Steyn, The effect of temperature, region and season on red colour development in apple peel under constant irradiance. Sci. Hortic. 73, 79–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M.B. Eberhardt, C.Y. Lee, R.H. Liu, Antioxidant activity of fresh apples. Nature 405, 903–904 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S.F. Hagen, G.I.A. Borge, G.B. Benstsson, W. Bilger, A. Berge, K. Haffner, Phenolic contents and other health and sensory related properties of apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh., cv. Aroma): Effect of postharvest UV-B irradiation. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 45, 1–19 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Lee, M.C. Jeong, K.H. Ku, Chemical, physical, and sensory properties of 1-MCP-treated Fuji apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit after long-term cold storage. Appl Biol Chem. 60, 363–374 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Y. Zhang, P. Li, L. Cheng, Development changes of carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids, and phenolic compounds in Honeycrisp apple flesh. Food Chem. 123, 1013–1018 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J.H. Hong, K.C. Cross, Surface sterilization of whole tomato fruit with sodium hypochlorite influences subsequent postharvest behavior of fresh-cut slices. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 13, 51–58 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D. Bakhai. O. Arakawa, Induction of phenolic compounds biosynthesis with light irradiation in the flesh of red and yellow apples. J. Appl. Hortic. 8, 101–104 (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Duba-Chodak, T. Tarko, T. Tuszynski, Antioxidant activity of apples—an impact of maturity stage and fruit part. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment 10, 443–454 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    I. Iglesias, G. Echeverria, Y. Soria, Differences in fruit colour development, anthocyanin content, fruit quality and consumer acceptability of eight ‘Gala’ apple strains. Sci. Hortic. 119, 32–40 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    R.M. Crassweller, R.A. Hollender, Consumer evaluation of  Delicious apple strains. Gruit Var. J. 43, 139–142 (1989)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    D.V. Fisher, D.O. Ketchie, Survey of literature on red strains of ‘Delicious’, 1st edn. (Pullman, Washington, 1989), pp. 23–37Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    I. Iglesias, S. Alegre, The effect of anti-hall nets on fruit protection, radiation, temperature, quality and profitability of ‘Mondial Gala’ apples. J. Appl. Hortic. 8, 91–100 (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    T.A. Baugher, H.W. Hogmire, T. Lightner, Determining apple packout losses and impact of profitability. Appl. Agric. Res. 5, 23–26 (1990)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Vogri, A. Kravos, Organoleptic evaluation of some apple varieties. Zbarnik Referatov. 1, 649–653 (2004)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    C. Rapillard, A. Dessimoz, Differencts mutants de Gala. Rev. Suisse Vitic. Hortic. 32, 233–237 (2000)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    C.S. Walsh, B. Statier, T. Sologmos, A. Thompson, Determining ‘Gala’ maturity for different stage regimes. Good Fruit Grower. 42, 6–10 (1991)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. Plotto, A.N. Azarenko, J.P. Mattheis, M.R. Mcdaniel, ‘Gala’, ‘Braeburn’ and ‘Fuji’ apples: maturity indices and quality after storage. Fruit Var. J. 49, 133–142 (1995)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Y. Guan, C. Peace, D. Rudell, S. Verma, K. Evans, QTLs detected for individual sugars and soluble solids content in apple. Mol. Breed. 35, 1–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    N. Oraguzie, P. Alspach, R. Voz, C. Whitworth, C. Ranatunga, R. Weskeet, R. Harker, Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 77, 111–120 (2009)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    F.R. Harker, K.B. Marsh, H. Young, S.H. Murray, F.A. Gunson, S.B. Walker, Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurement 2: sweet and acid taste of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24, 241–250 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group of Food Storage and DistributionKorea Food Research InstituteWanjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations