Advertisement

Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 1788–1796 | Cite as

Effects of NaCl and pH on the functional properties of edible crickets (Acheta domesticus) protein concentrate

  • Alex K. NdirituEmail author
  • John N. Kinyuru
  • Paul N. Gichuhi
  • Glaston M. Kenji
Original Paper
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

For a long time whole edible insects have been consumed in developing countries as part of food. With the aim of promoting food and nutrition security there is a focus on the industrial value addition of edible insects. The industrial utilization is hampered by limited information regarding the functionality of cricket proteins in food matrixes. Therefore this study aims at determining the NaCl and pH at which the functional properties of edible crickets protein concentrates is optimum. Reared edible crickets were acquired from JKUAT farm in Kenya, freeze dried and ground to powder. Two methods were used to extract the proteins namely; hexane and aqueous extraction. The protein solubility, water holding capacity, emulsion capacity and stability, foaming capacity and stability and least gelation concentration of the protein concentrates were determined separately using NaCl at concentrations of 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 12% and pH regimes of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 respectively. Protein solubility of the protein concentrates decreased from pH 2 to pH 8 followed by a significant increase at pH 12. Increase of NaCl concentration to 4% increased the water holding capacity followed by a decline towards 12%. pH had significant effect on the water holding capacity of the protein concentrates (p = 0.0246). Emulsion capacity decreased with increase in NaCl concentration up to 6% followed by an increase with continuous increase in NaCl concentration. NaCl and pH considerably influenced the foaming capacity of the protein concentrates. The least gelation concentration of the protein concentrates was 30%.

Keywords

Edible cricket Hexane extract Emulsion capacity Protein concentrate Protein solubility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology Research, Production and Extension department (JKUAT-RPE) for funding this project and the department of Food Science and Technology JKUAT for providing facilities and technical support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Yi, C.M.M. Lakemond, L.M.C. Sagis, V. Eisner-Schadler, A. van Huis, M. van Boekel, Extraction and characterization of protein fractions from five insect species. Food Chem. 141, 3341–3348 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. van Huis, Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58, 563–583 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.K. Ndiritu, J.N. Kinyuru, G.M. Kenji, P.N. Gichuhi, Extraction technique influences the physico-chemical characteristics and functional properties of edible crickets (Acheta domesticus) protein concentrate. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11, 2013–2021 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9584-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.R. DeFoliart, The human use of insects as food and as animal feed. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 35, 22–35 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1093/besa/35.1.22 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.D. Finke, Estimate of chitin in raw whole insects. Zoo Biol. 26, 93–104 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.D. Finke, Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores. Zoo Biol. 21, 269–285 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laos (2010) Agenda item 13: Comments of Lao PDR: Proposal for the new work and development of regional standard for edible crickets and their products (CRD 8). In: 17th session of the FAO/WHO Coordinating Committee for Asia (CCASIA), Bali, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Yu, M. Ahmedna, I. Goktepe, Peanut protein concentrate: production and functional properties as affected by processing. Food Chem. 103, 121–129 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Albarracín, I.C. Sánchez, R. Grau, J.M. Barat, Salt in food processing; usage and reduction: a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 46, 1329–1336 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02492.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Zhang, B. Jiang, W. Mu, Z. Wang, Emulsifying properties of chickpea protein isolates: Influence of pH and NaCl. Food Hydrocoll. 23, 146–152 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Yi, C.M.M. Lakemond, L.M.C. Sagis, V. Eisner-schadler, A. Huis, M.A. Van Boekel (2013) Extraction and characterisation of protein fractions from five insect species. Food Chem. 141, 3341–3348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.C. Nabayo, N. Tenyang, F. Tchouanguep, P. Villeneuve, J. Fanni, Nutritional value and effect of cooking, drying and storage process on some functional properties of Rhynchophorus phoenicis. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharm. Res. 2, 203–219 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E.E. Babiker, A.B. Hassan, M.M. Eltayeb, G.A. Osman, N.M. Elhassan, K.A. Hassan, Solubility and functional properties of boiled and fried Sudanese tree locust flour as a function of NaCl concentration. J. Food Technol. 5, 210–214 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.U. Wu, N.S. Hettiarachchy, M. Qi, Hydrophobicity, solubility, and emulsifying properties of soy protein peptides prepared by papain modification and ultrafiltration. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 75, 845–850 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-998-0235-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Were, N.S. Hettiarachchy, U. Kalapathy, Modified soy proteins with improved foaming and water hydration properties. J. Food Sci. 62, 821–824 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Naczk, L.J. Rubin, F. Shahidi (1986) Functional properties and phytate content of pea protein preparations. 51:1245–1247Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    AACC (2000) AACC Method 56–30 Water Hydration Capacity of Protein MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.W. Coffmann, V.V. Garcia, Functional properties and amino acid content of protein isolate from mungbean flour. J. Food Technol. 12, 473–484 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O.T. Omotoso, C.O. Adedire, Nutrient composition, mineral content and the solubility of the proteins of palm weevil, Rhynchophorus phoenicis f. (Coleoptera : Curculionidae). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 8, 318–322 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O.T. Omotoso, Nutritional quality, functional properties and anti-nutrient compositions of the larva of Cirina forda (Westwood) (Lepidoptera:Saturniidae). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 7, 51–55 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.B0051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.A. Alsohaimy, M.Z. Sitohy, R.A. El-Masry, Isolation and partial characterization of chickpea, lupine and lentil seed proteins. World J. Agric. Sci. 3, 123–127 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O.S. Lawal, Functionality of African Locust Bean (Parkia biglobossa) protein isolate: effects of pH, ionic strength and various protein concentrations. Food Chem. 86, 345–355 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.A. Oshodi, E. Ojokan, Effect of salts on some of the functional properties of bovine plasma protein concentrate. Food Chem. 59, 333–338 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H.R. Sharif, P.A. Williams, M.K. Sharif, S. Abbas, H. Majeed, K.G. Masamba, W. Safdar, F. Zhong, Current progress in the utilization of native and modified legume proteins as emulsifiers and encapsulants: a review. Food Hydrocoll. 76, 2–16 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K.A. Thorarinsdottir, S. Arason, S.G. Bogason, K. Kristbergsson, Effects of phosphate on yield, quality, and water-holding capacity in the processing of salted cod (Gadus morhua). J. Food Sci. 66, 821–826 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15180.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Boye, F. Zare, A. Pletch, Pulse proteins: processing, characterization, functional properties and applications in food and feed. Food Res. Int. 43, 414–431 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Offer, P. Knight, Structural basis of water holding in meat. Meat Sci. 4, 63–171 (1988)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Wu, Q. Wang, T. Ma, J. Ren, Comparative studies on the functional properties of various protein concentrate preparations of peanut protein. Food Res. Int. 42, 343–348 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2008.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Adeyeye, Proximate composition, nutritionally valuable minerals and the effects of some salts on the functional properties of silkworm (Anaphe infracta) larvae. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 51, 77–85 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D.J. McClements, Protein-stabilized emulsions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 9, 305–313 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2004.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. Jaffery, A. Hasnain, K. Jamil, T. Abbas, Correlation and path analysis in candidate bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) lines evaluated in micro-plot test trial. Pak J Sci 48, 223–296 (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S.O. Ogunwolu, F.O. Henshaw, H.P. Mock, A. Santros, S.O. Awonorin, Functional properties of protein concentrates and isolates produced from cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) nut. Food Chem. 115, 852–858 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    N.A. El Nasri, A.H. El Tinay, Functional properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum) protein concentrate. Food Chem. 103, 582–589 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    K.A. Magzoub, Physico-chemical properties of tree locust flour as influence by pH and/or NaCl concentration. University of Khartoum (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    W.H. Isris, E.E. Babiker, A.H.E.L. Tinay, Solubility and functional properties of sesame seed proteins as influenced by pH and/or salt concentration. Nahrung/Food 82, 361–366 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00555-1 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    D.D.M. Ragab, E.E. Babiker, A.H. Eltinay, Fractionation, solubility and functional properties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) proteins as affected by pH and/or salt concentration. Food Chem. 84, 207–212 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00203-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    B.E. Chove, A.S. Grandison, M.J. Lewis, Some functional properties of fractionated soy protein isolates obtained by microfiltration. Food Hydrocoll. 21, 1379–1388 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    O.S. Lawal, K.O. Adebowale, Y.A. Adebowale, Functional properties of native and chemically modified protein concentrates from bambarra groundnut. Food Res. Int. 40, 1003–1011 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2007.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    E.T. Akintayo, A.A. Oshodi, K.O. Esuoso, Effects of NaCl, ionic strength and pH on the foaming and gelation of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) protein concentrates. Food Chem. 66, 51–56 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00155-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex K. Ndiritu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • John N. Kinyuru
    • 1
  • Paul N. Gichuhi
    • 3
  • Glaston M. Kenji
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and TechnologyJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and TechnologyNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Department of Environmental HealthUniversity of KabiangaKerichoKenya
  3. 3.Department of Pure and Applied SciencesTechnical University of MombasaMombasaKenya

Personalised recommendations