Beyond Sexual Dimorphism and Habitat Boundaries: Coloration Correlates with Morphology, Age, and Locomotor Performance in a Toad
Coloration is often key in animal communication, and is frequently subjected to strong natural and sexual selection, often with opposed directions: natural selection typically favors cryptic colorations whereas sexual selection may favor conspicuous colorations. Also, different coloration traits may convey different pieces of information. Plus, coloration may vary among habitats, mirroring local selective pressures. In this work, we test if color parameters (luminosity, chroma, and hue) of back and throat are related to different life-history and morphological traits in Epidalea calamita toads. Furthermore, we check possible variability of color parameters between agrosystem and natural habitat toads. Toad coloration was sexually dimorphic, which suggests a role of coloration in sexual communication. Moreover, coloration correlated with age, body size, hindlimb length, and sprint speed. These findings suggest communication based on coloration beyond sex recognition: coloration could act as a signal of overall quality of bearers, with a potential role in mate choice. Moreover, coloration differed between habitats. Greener backs in agrosystem toads could indicate greater intensity of predator pressure, while their higher saturation could indicate greater investment in mate attraction. This result is aligned with previous findings that agrosystem toads respond to reduced lifespan with greater reproductive investment.
KeywordsAmphibian Anuran Color traits Epidalea calamita Habitat differences Skeletochronology
Toads were captured in accordance with permissions from Junta de Andalucía issued to the authors (reference AWG/MGD/MGM/CB). The authors assumed the expenses of the work. FJZ-C was partly supported by a Fundación Ramón Areces postdoctoral grant and a Juan de la Cierva-Formación contract by the Spanish Government, and MC was supported by a Severo Ochoa contract (ref: SVP-2014-068620). Comments by two anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Andersson, S., & Prager, M. (2006). Quantifying colors. In K. J. McGraw & G. E. Hill (Eds.), Bird coloration volume I: Mechanisms and measurements (pp. 41–89). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bowcock, H., Brown, G. P., & Shine, R. (2009). Beastly bondage: The costs of amplexus in cane toads (Bufo marinus). Copeia, 2009, 29–36.Google Scholar
- Comas, M., Reguera, S., Zamora-Camacho, F. J., Salvadó, H., & Moreno-Rueda, G. (2016). Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 39, 237–240.Google Scholar
- Gómez-Mestre, I. (2014). Sapo corredor—Epidalea calamita (Laurenti, 1768). In A. Salvador & A. Marco (Eds.), Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. http://www.vertebradosibericos.org. See.
- Hill, G. E., & McGraw, K. J. (2006a). Bird coloration. Vol. 1. Mechanisms and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hill, G. E., & McGraw, K. J. (2006b). Bird coloration. Vol. 2. Function and evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, L. E., Vega, A., Dudgeon, S., Kaiser, K., & Robertson, J. M. (2017). Local not vocal: Assortative female choice in divergent populations of red-eyed treefrogs, Agalychnis callidryas (Hylidae: Phylomedusinae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120, 171–178.Google Scholar
- Martín, J., & López, P. (2001). Risk of predation may explain the absence of nuptial coloration in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 3, 889–898.Google Scholar
- McGraw, K. J., Hill, G. E., Stradi, R., & Parker, R. S. (2001). The influence of carotenoid acquisition and utilization on the maintenance of species-typical plumage pigmentation in male American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) and northern cardinals (Carduelis cardinalis). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 74, 843–852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Montgomerie, R. (2006). Analyzing colors. In: G. E. Hill, K. J. McGraw (Eds), Bird coloration Volume I: mechanisims and measurements (pp 90–140). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Siefferman, L., Hill, G. E., & Dobson, F. S. (2005). Ornamental plumage coloration and condition are dependent on age in eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis. Journal of Avian Ecology, 36, 428–435.Google Scholar
- Sztatecsny, M., Preininger, D., Freudmann, A., Loretto, M. C., Maier, F., & Hödl, W. (2012). Don’t get the blues: Conspicuous nuptial colouration of male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) supports visual male recognition during scramble competition in large breeding aggregations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 1587–1593.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle, a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar