Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens
We employed a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with capillary electrophoresis (mPCR-CE) targeting six Clostridium difficile genes, including tpi, tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, cdtB, and a deletion in tcdC for simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic C. difficile directly from fecal specimens. The mPCR-CE had a limit of detection of 10 colony-forming units per reaction with no cross-reactions with other related bacterial genes. Clinical validation was performed on 354 consecutively collected stool specimens from patients with suspected C. difficile infection and 45 isolates. The results were compared with a reference standard combined with BD MAX Cdiff, real-time cell analysis assay (RTCA), and mPCR-CE. The toxigenic C. difficile species were detected in 36 isolates and 45 stool specimens by the mPCR-CE, which provided a positive rate of 20.3% (81/399). The mPCR-CE had a specificity of 97.2% and a sensitivity of 96.0%, which was higher than RTCA (x2 = 5.67, P = 0.017) but lower than BD MAX Cdiff (P = 0.245). Among the 45 strains, 44 (97.8%) were determined as nonribotype 027 by the mPCR-CE, which was fully agreed with PCR ribotyping. Even though ribotypes 017 (n = 8, 17.8%), 001 (n = 6, 13.3%), and 012 (n = 7, 15.6%) were predominant in this region, ribotype 027 was an important genotype monitored routinely. The mPCR-CE provided an alternative diagnosis tool for the simultaneous detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and potentially differentiated between RT027 and non-RT027.
KeywordsClostridium difficile multiplex PCR capillary electrophoresis detection characterization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by the Programs for Major Science and Technology Medicine and Healthcare in Zhejiang (No. WKJ-ZJ-1507), the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang (Nos. 2015G03048 and 2017C03028), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81471998), the Project of Medical Health and Technology in Zhejiang (No. 2016DTB005), and the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Support Grant (No. P30 CA008748).
- 3.Indra A, Schmid D, Huhulescu S, Hell M, Gattringer R, Hasenberger P, Fiedler A, Wewalka G, Allerberger F. Characterization of clinical Clostridium difficile isolates by PCR ribotyping and detection of toxin genes in Austria, 2006–2007. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57(6): 702–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Snydman DR, McDermott LA, Jacobus NV, Thorpe C, Stone S, Jenkins SG, Goldstein EJ, Patel R, Forbes BA, Mirrett S, Johnson S, Gerding DN. U.S.-based national sentinel surveillance study for the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrheal isolates and their susceptibility to fidaxomicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59(10): 6437–6443CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20(Suppl 2): 1–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, Oughton M, Libman MD, Michaud S, Bourgault AM, Nguyen T, Frenette C, Kelly M, Vibien A, Brassard P, Fenn S, Dewar K, Hudson TJ, Horn R, René P, Monczak Y, Dascal A. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(23): 2442–2449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Samie A, Obi CL, Franasiak J, Archbald-Pannone L, Bessong PO, Alcantara-Warren C, Guerrant RL. PCR detection of Clostridium difficile triose phosphate isomerase (tpi), toxin A (tcdA), toxin B (tcdB), binary toxin (cdtA, cdtB), and tcdC genes in Vhembe District, South Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008; 78(4): 577–585PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, Mattrat MA, Maillard K, Lemeland JF, Pons JL. Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(12): 5710–5714CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Chow WH, Mc Closkey C, Tong Y, Hu L, You Q, Kelly CP, Kong H, Tang YW, Tang W. Application of isothermal helicasedependent amplification with a disposable detection device in a simple sensitive stool test for toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Mol Diagn 2008; 10(5): 452–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Polage CR, Gyorke CE, Kennedy MA, Leslie JL, Chin DL, Wang S, Nguyen HH, Huang B, Tang YW, Lee LW, Kim K, Taylor S, Romano PS, Panacek EA, Goodell PB, Solnick JV, Cohen SH. Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection in the molecular test era. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175(11): 1792–1801CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Oh MH, Paek SH, Shin GW, Kim HY, Jung GY, Oh S. Simultaneous identification of seven foodborne pathogens and Escherichia coli (pathogenic and nonpathogenic) using capillary electrophoresis-based single-strand conformation polymorphism coupled with multiplex PCR. J Food Prot 2009; 72(6): 1262–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Hung CC, Chen CP, Lin SP, Chien SC, Lee CN, Cheng WF, Hsieh WS, Liu MS, Su YN, Lin WL. Quantitative assay of deletion or duplication genotype by capillary electrophoresis system: application in Prader–Willi syndrome and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Chem 2006; 52(12): 2203–2210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Brooks G, Carroll K, Butel J, Morse S. Jawetz, Melnick & Adelberg’s Medical Microbiology. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill, 2007Google Scholar
- 36.Fang WJ, Jing DZ, Luo Y, Fu CY, Zhao P, Qian J, Tian BR, Chen XG, Zheng YL, Zheng Y, Deng J, Zou WH, Feng XR, Liu FL, Mou XZ, Zheng SS. Clostridium difficile carriage in hospitalized cancer patients: a prospective investigation in Eastern China. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14(1): 523CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Huang B, Jin D, Zhang J, Sun JY, Wang X, Stiles J, Xu X, Kamboj M, Babady NE, Tang YW. Real-time cellular analysis coupled with a specimen enrichment accurately detects and quantifies Clostridium difficile toxins in stool. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52(4): 1105–1111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Indra A, Huhulescu S, Schneeweis M, Hasenberger P, Kernbichler S, Fiedler A, Wewalka G, Allerberger F, Kuijper EJ. Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates using capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR ribotyping. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57(11): 1377–1382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 43.Carroll KC, Buchan BW, Tan S, Stamper PD, Riebe KM, Pancholi P, Kelly C, Rao A, Fader R, Cavagnolo R, Watson W, Goering RV, Trevino EA, Weissfeld AS, Ledeboer NA. Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51(12): 4120–4125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 51.Spina A, Kerr KG, Cormican M, Barbut F, Eigentler A, Zerva L, Tassios P, Popescu GA, Rafila A, Eerola E, Batista J, Maass M, Aschbacher R, Olsen KE, Allerberger F. Spectrum of enteropathogens detected by the Film Array GI Panel in a multicentre study of community-acquired gastroenteritis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21 (8): 719–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.Gilbreath JJ, Verma P, Abbott AN, Butler-Wu SM. Comparison of the Verigene Clostridium difficile, Simplexa C. difficile Universal Direct, BD MAX Cdiff, and Xpert C. difficile assays for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 80(1): 13–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Spigaglia P, Barbanti F, Mastrantonio P, Brazier JS, Barbut F, Delmée M, Kuijper E, Poxton IR; European Study Group on Clostridium difficile (ESGCD). Fluoroquinolone resistance in Clostridium difficile isolates from a prospective study of C. difficile infections in Europe. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57(Pt 6): 784–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 64.Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, Mc Donald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(5):431–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar