Assessing motor, visual and language function using a single 5-minute fMRI paradigm: three birds with one stone
- 180 Downloads
Clinical functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) requires inferences on localization of major brain functions at the individual subject level. We hypothesized that a single “triple use” task would satisfy sensitivity and reliability requirements for successfully assessing the motor, visual and language domain in this context. This was tested here by the application in a group of healthy adults, assessing sensitivity and reliability at the individual subject level, separately for each domain.
Our “triple use” task consisted of 2 conditions (condition 1, assessing motor and visual domain, and condition 2, assessing the language domain), serving mutually as active/control. We included 20 healthy adult subjects. Random effect analyses showed activation in primary motor, visual and language regions, as expected. Less expected regions were activated both for the motor and visual domains. Further, reliability of primary activation patterns was very high across individual subjects, with activation seen in 70–100% of subjects in primary motor, visual, and left-lateralized language regions.
These findings suggest the “triple use” task to be reliable at the individual subject’s level to assess motor, visual and language domains in the clinical fMRI context. Benefits of such an approach include shortening of acquisition time, simplicity of the task for each domain, and using a visual stimulus. Following establishment of reliability in adults, the task may also be a valuable addition in the pediatric clinical fMRI context, where each of these factors is of high relevance.
KeywordsClinical functional MRI Children Visual Motor Language Triple use
We would like to thank Eleonore Schwilling, PhD, for her expert help in voice recordings, and Mickael Dinomais, University of Caens, France, for supplying the hand video recordings.
This study was funded in part by the H.W. & J. Hector Foundation, Mannheim (M66, to MW). The sponsor had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Simona Fiori declares that she has no conflict of interest. Carolin Zendler declares that she has no conflict of interest. Till-Karsten Hauser declares that he has no conflict of interest. Karen Lidzba declares that she has no conflict of interest. Marko Wilke declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bremmer, F., Schlack, A., Shah, N. J., Zafiris, O., Kubischik, M., Hoffmann, K., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2001). Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron, 29(1), 287 – 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Broser, P. J., Groeschel, S., Hauser, T. K., Lidzba, K., & Wilke, M. (2012). Functional MRI-guided probabilistic tractography of cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical language networks in children. Neuroimage, 63(3), 1561–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown, E. C., Muzik, O., Rothermel, R., Matsuzaki, N., Juhász, C., Shah, A. K., Atkinson, M. D., Fuerst, D., Mittal, S., Sood, S., Diwadkar, V. A., & Asano, E. (2012). Evaluating reverse speech as a control task with language-related gamma activity on electrocorticography. Neuroimage, 60(4), 2335–2345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.040.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H. J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal Neuroscience, 13(2), 400–404.Google Scholar
- Gaillard, W. D., Balsamo, L., Xu, B., McKinney, C., Papero, P. H., Weinstein, S., Conry, J., Pearl, P. L., Sachs, B., Sato, S., Vezina, L. G., Frattali, C., & Theodore, W. H. (2004). fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology, 63(8), 1403–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gebauer, D., Fink, A., Kargl, R., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., Purgstaller, C., Fazekas, F., & Enzinger, C. (2012). Differences in brain function and changes with intervention in children with poor spelling and reading abilities. PLoS One, 7(5), e38201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Henson, R. (2007). Efficient experimental design for fMRI, in Statisitcal Parametric Mapping. The Analysis of Functional Brain Images, eds Friston K. J. Ashburner, J. T. Kiebel S. J. Nichols T. E., Penny W. D., (Eds.), (London: Academic Press;), pp. 193–210.Google Scholar
- Malone, I. B., Leung, K. K., Clegg, S., Barnes, J., Whitwell, J. L., Ashburner, J., Fox, N. C., & Ridgway, G. R. (2015) Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: a nuisance variable with less nuisance. Neuroimage. 104:366 – 72.Google Scholar
- Máté, A., Lidzba, K., Hauser, T. K., Staudt, M., & Wilke, M. (2016). A “one size fits all” approach to language fMRI: increasing specificity and applicability by adding a self-paced component. Experimental Brain Research. 234(3), 673 – 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4473-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sroka, M. C., Vannest, J., Maloney, T. C., Horowitz-Kraus, T., Byars, A. W., & Holland, S. K. CMIND Authorship Consortium (2015) Relationship between receptive vocabulary and the neural substrates for story processing in preschoolers. Brain Imaging Behavior. 9(1):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-014-9342-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suarez, R. O., Taimouri, V., Boyer, K., Vega, C., Rotenberg, A., Madsen, J. R., Loddenkemper, T., Duffy, F. H., Prabhu, S. P., & Warfield, S. K. (2014). Passive fMRI mapping of language function for pediatric epilepsy surgical planning: validation using Wada, ECS, and FMAER. Epilepsy Reseach, 108(10), 1874–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Szaflarski, J. P., Altaye, M., Rajagopal, A., Eaton, K., Meng, X., Plante, E., & Holland, S. K. (2012). A 10-year longitudinal fMRI study of narrative comprehension in children and adolescents. Neuroimage, 15(3), 1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.049. 63).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Marie, D., Zago, L., Jobard, G., Perchey, G., Leroux, G., Mellet, E., Joliot, M., Crivello, F., Petit, L., & Mazoyer, B. (2015). Heschl’s gyrification pattern is related to speech-listening hemispheric lateralization: FMRI investigation in 281 healthy volunteers. Brain Structure and Functions, 220(3), 1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0746-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vannest, J., Rajagopal, A., Cicchino, N. D., Franks-Henry, J., Simpson, S. M., Lee, G., Altaye, M., Sroka, C., & Holland, S. K. CMIND Authorship Consortium (2014) Factors determining success of awake and asleep magnetic resonance imaging scans in nonsedated children. Neuropediatrics. 45(6):370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vannest, J. J., Karunanayaka, P. R., Altaye, M., Schmithorst, V. J., Plante, E. M., Eaton, K. J., Rasmussen, J. M., & Holland, S. K. (2009). Comparison of fMRI data from passive listening and active-response story processing tasks in children. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 29(4), 971–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vogt, S., Buccino, G., Wohlschläger, A. M., Canessa, N., Shah, N. J., Zilles, K., Eickhoff, S. B., Freund, H. J., Rizzolatti, G., & Fink, G. R. (2007). Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: effects of practice and expertise. Neuroimage, 37(4), 1371–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wells, E. M., & Packer, R. J. (2015) Pediatric brain tumors. Continuum (Minneap Minn). Neuro-oncology, 21(2), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000464176.96311.d1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilke, M., Pieper, T., Lindner, K., Dushe, T., Holthausen, H., & Krägeloh-Mann, I. (2010). Why one task is not enough: functional MRI for atypical language organization in two children. European Journal Paediatric Neurology, 14(6), 474–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2010.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WMA (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available at https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/, last accessed 12 Dec, 2017.
- Yerys, B. E., Jankowski, K. F., Shook, D., Rosenberger, L. R., Barnes, K. A., Berl, M. M., Ritzl, E. K., Vanmeter, J., Vaidya, C. J., & Gaillard, W. D. (2009). The fMRI success rate of children and adolescents: typical development, epilepsy, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders. Human Brain Mapping, 30(10), 3426–3435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar