Advertisement

Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae causes stem canker of Chinese hackberry in China

  • Lu Liang
  • Huan Li
  • Lifeng Zhou
  • Fengmao ChenEmail author
Open Access
Original Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Chinese hackberry (Celtis sinensis Pers.) is an adaptable species widely growing in southern China. The symptoms of canker on stems of seedlings were discovered mid-July 2017 in Shuyang, Jiangsu Province. The diseased portions of the stems were dark brown due to discoloured xylem. Some seedlings showed symptoms of wilting, leaf fall, twig dieback, and tissue discolouration. The outbreak period was concentrated in July and August, suggesting that the disease spread during summer months. Possible fungal causal agents were isolated from naturally infected canker tissue and discoloured xylem. The isolate from xylem tissue with a high frequency (> 50%) was named Ls7 type. Pathogenicity tests were carried out on 4-year-old seedlings. The symptoms of canker began to develop 20 days after inoculation with Ls7 isolate and by day 35, there were dark, enlarged longitudinal lesions. A phylogenetic tree of the isolate was developed using the internal transcribed spacer, elongation factor-1α (tef1-α), β-tubulin gene (TUB) and RNA polymerase II subunit primer genes (RPB2). Based on morphological features and phylogenetic information, the pathogen was identified as Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae. This is the first report of L. pseudotheobromae causing canker on Chinese hackberry stems in China.

Keywords

Botryosphaeriaceae Plant pathogen Tree disease 

Introduction

Chinese hackberry (Celtis sinensis Pers.) is an important and widely planted ornamental tree species in China, Japan and Korea (Lee et al. 2019) and is tolerant of dry and nutrient-poor soils. The tender leaf, roots and bark of hackberry can reduce swelling, relieve pain, clearing away heat and toxic materials. It is also used as industrial materials and various furniture. Its rhizome fibers are strong and used in paper making, making ropes, artificial cotton and artificial fiber. The species has significant value in medicine and industry (Cao 2017). However, with increased planting, Chinese hackberry diseases are increasing and becoming more and more serious (Cacciola 2000; Berbegal et al. 2012; Luongo et al. 2015). Common diseases of Chinese hackberry are powdery mildew, stem and root rot, twig blight and leaf spot.

The Botryosphaeriaceae is a fungal family containing pathogens that cause canker disease of trees (Pavlic 2004). Lasiodiplodia species are members of the Botryosphaeriaceae and are widely found in tropical and subtropical regions (Phillips et al. 2013). Lasiodiplodia species causing disease of Chinese hackberry have not been found in China.

In the summer of 2017 in Shuyang, Jiangsu Province, a severe outbreak of Chinese hackberry disease appeared. The slightly sunken grey–black lesions enlarged longitudinally and the associated weakening of tree vigor affected the ornamental and commercial value of the species.

The objectives of this study were to: (1) discover the epidemiology of canker occurring on Chinese hackberry; (2) prove the pathogenicity of the fungal pathogen using Koch’s Postulates Test; and (3) identify the causal agent using morphological and molecular techniques.

Materials and methods

Sampling and fungal isolations

In mid-July 2017, symptoms of stem canker were found in commercial nurseries located in Shuyang County, Suqian City, Jiangsu Province (118°36′48′′E; 34°15′25′′N). The entire infected 4-year-old seedlings were brought to the laboratory for isolation of the pathogen.

Two ends of the cankers with spots in the middle were cut to form a small segment of 50 mm, and treated under aseptic conditions. The samples were sterilized in 75% alcohol for 3 min, dried quickly under a flame and rinsed three times with aseptic water for 30 s. Aseptic filter paper was used to absorb the water on the surface. The tissues were cut into 4 × 4 mm pieces between symptomatic and healthy tissues and cultured on fresh potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium containing 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin (Dai et al. 2007; Correia et al. 2016).

Samples were cultured at 25 °C in a dark incubator. Colony and spore morphologies were recorded every 24 h using a Nikon DS-Ri1 camera, Stereo Discovery, V20, Zeiss. The length and width of conidia were measured and the means, standard deviations and 95% reliable intervals computed from 50 samples.

Pathogenicity tests

Sixty fungal samples were divided into different groups according to colony morphology and ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. All the isolate groups were tested for pathogenicity on the seedling stems. Each group was cultured for 7 days at 25 °C in darkness. Ten healthy Chinese hackberry seedlings (from ‘Yanguan chunxiao farm’; Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province 30°27′21′′N, 120°32′40′′E) were inoculated with each type of fungal isolates, respectively. Each plant was stabbed by placing a 4-mm-diameter mycelium plug of PDA placed face-down on each puncture wound. An additional ten seedlings were inoculated with sterilized PDA agar blocks as controls. All inoculated seedlings were kept in a greenhouse at 25 °C under ambient conditions of 70–80% humidity, with 24 h light every day. The experiment was carried out during the summer of 2018.

DNA extraction and sequence amplification

Fungal isolates were cultured in PDA medium for 5 days at 25 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted from mature mycelia according to Zhang et al. (2008). The procedure was: (1) mycelium grown for 3–4 days was placed in 2 mL test tubes with 500 µL of 2 × CTAB (containing 1% β-mercaptoethanol), rapidly cooled for 30 s in liquid nitrogen, and then heated immediately to 65 °C for 30 s. This was repeated three times; (2) a 1/2 volume of glass beads was added to each test tube before placing on a vortex shaker for 4–5 min, followed by heating to 65 °C for 20 min and shaking once every 10 min. Equal amounts of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v:v:v) were added and the tubes centrifuged at 12,000/min for 10 min; (3) two volumes of pre-cooled absolute ethanol was added to the supernatant, mixed well and the tubes placed in stand still for 20–30 min at 20 °C followed by centrifuging for 10 min at 12,000 r/min. The supernatant was poured out and 200 µL of 70% alcohol was added to wash the DNA pellet, which was then dried at room temperature. One hundred µL TE was added to completely dissolve the DNA; and, (4) 100 µL of RNase A (10 mg/mL) was attached to each tube and dried at 65 °C for 30 min. Step 3 was repeated and 30 µL of ddH2O was added to obtain a solution of the DNA.

The polymerase chain reaction amplification system (PCR; 50 µL) contains 25 µL Etaq pre-Mix, 4 µL DNA template (approximately 200 ng), 2 µL forward primer, 2 µL reverse primer, and 17 µL ddH2O.

Four pairs of primers were selected to amplify the target gene: ITS-1 and ITS-4 (ITS) (White et al. 1994); EF1-688F and EF1-1251R (tef1-α) (Alves et al. 2008); Bt2a and Bt2b (TUB) (Glass and Donaldson 1995); and, RPB2-LasF and RPB2-LasR (RPB2) (Cruywagen et al. 2016).

The PCR reaction procedure had the following steps: (1) initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; (2) denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, (3) annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extending at 72 °C for 33 cycles; and (4) extending at 72 °C for 10 min. However, the annealing temperature of TUB and RPB2 was 52 °C (Alves et al. 2004).

DNA amplification and sequencing were carried out with a GStorm Gradient PCR (Mastercycler nexus GSX1) using a program according to Zhang et al. (2008). The PCR products were sequenced by GenScript Biotechnology in Nanjing, China. To avoid errors in sequencing, DNA strands were spliced using forward and reverse primers (Two-way measurement: Sequencing Complete Sequences from Two Directions).

Phylogenetic analyses

The resulting ITS, tef1-α, TUB and RPB2 gene sequences were blasted. Other sequences needed were obtained from the GenBank database of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). These sequences were aligned using MEGA version 5.0. Ambiguously aligned regions were excluded and gaps were treated as missing data. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) approach (Tamura et al. 2011), which was validated using bootstrap analyses with 1000 repetitions (Saitou and Nei 1987). The phylogenetic tree was based on the concatenated sequences of ITS, tef1-α, TUB and RPB2.

Results

Incidence of the disease and symptoms

In the summer of 2016, a small amount of Chinese hackberry canker disease occurred but did not attract attention in Suqian City. However, by mid-July 2017, the incidence of Chinese hackberry canker was high with symptoms of the disease in over 21% of the 6000 m2 of plantations of the species. The canker disease reappeared again in late July and August as well as spread rapidly.

The initial sites of infection appeared as watery reddish brown spots (Fig. 1a), and the top young leaves on twigs were wrinkled and brittle due to dehydration (Fig. 1b). With the development of the disease, slightly concave canker spots extended and gradually turned black–brown (Fig. 1c). Transverse sections of xylem tissue were also black–brown (Fig. 1d). Eventually, the twigs wilted.
Fig. 1

Disease symptoms observed on Chinese hackberry in Shuyang, Jiangsu. a Stem blotch and canker in the beginning. b The leaves of the diseased plant showed dieback. c Canker spots extended longitudinally in the later stages of the canker disease. d Lesions in the inner stem of a diseased plant

Fungal isolations and pathogenicity tests

Sixty fungal samples were divided into seven types numbered Ls1 to Ls7 type according to colony morphology. Among these, more than 50% were classified as Ls7 type and found to be similar to Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae. According to the ITS sequence, Ls1 –Ls7 types were identified as Fusarium tricinctum (2%), Diaporthe spp. (3%), Clonostachys rosea (8%), Alternaria alternaria (11%), Fusarium equiseti (12%), Rhizoctonia solani (14%) and L. pseudotheobromae (50%).

In mid-June 2018, each of the seven types of fungi was inoculated to 4-year-old seedlings with 10 replicates. After 20 days, eight seedlings inoculated Ls7 isolate showed disease symptoms similar to those that appeared in the field, including local, spindle-shaped necrosis and slightly concave red-brown spots (approximately 25 mm × 5 mm) (Fig. 2b). Two seedlings inoculated with Ls7 isolate developed canker spots on days 23 and 27 after inoculation, respectively. After 35 days, the lesions on these seedlings spread longitudinally on the stem, gradually changed shape from round to fusiform and became slightly concave. The lesions were approximately 98 mm × 6 mm (Fig. 2c, d). These dark brown lesions contained pycnidia densely packed with conidia, and leaves on the twigs began to wilt (Fig. 2c). The xylem was also dark brown (Fig. 2e). Seedlings inoculated with sterile PDA showed no symptoms of canker (Fig. 2a) and resembled the Ls1–Ls6 isolates.
Fig. 2

Results of the pathogenicity trial. a Control stem (not inoculated with L. pseudothebromae). b Symptoms at the early stage, reddish brown spots and canker developing around the inoculation sites. c Symptoms at a later stage; typical canker symptoms of Chinese hackberry 35 days after stem inoculation. d Mature conidiomata on the disease site in this disease. e Xylem discoloration (Bars = 500 µm)

The fungus was recovered from the symptomatic inoculated tissues and the culture’s characteristics and morphology were similar to the Ls7 isolate. Therefore, the Ls7 isolate was determined to be the pathogen, although the seedlings infected with Ls7 isolate did not die.

Morphological characteristics of pathogen

Colonies of the Ls7 isolate grew rapidly, and after 3 days of culturing at 25 °C, were grayish-white with uneven edges (Fig. 3a). The colonies turned dark gray after 5 days (Fig. 3b), at which stage aerial hyphae were thick and fluffy. Following 2 weeks of treatment under UV light, the colonies produced pycnidia (Fig. 3c, d). There were many short conidiophores on the inner walls and conidia on the conidiophores. The pycnidia were nearly spherical, approximately 220–240 µm diameter, and formed scattered, unilocular, dark-brown to black areas on the stem and host epidermis (Fig. 4a). Conidiogenous cells were hyaline, cylindrical and holoblastic (Fig. 4c). Conidiophores were inflated at their base with one diaphragm which reduced to conidiogenous cells (Fig. 4d, e). Conidia were oval, both ends round and blunt, wider in the middle, initially transparent and aseptate or not partitioned (Fig. 4f). These had one septum and became puce after maturity; melanin appeared in the conidia and the surface was striped (Fig. 4g, h). [A condium accompany with partial germ tube (Fig. 4i)]. The sizes of conidia were 22.2–28.6 × 12.1–17.4 μm (95% confidence limits = 25.2 ± 2.6 × 14.4 ± 2.4) and the average conidia length–width ratio was approximately 1.7 (Table 1). The paraphyses were hyaline and upward cylindrical. (Fig. 4b). In addition, the Ls7 isolate grew at 10 °C and produced dark pink colonies at 35 °C (Fig. 5). The morphological characteristics of the Ls7 isolate fit those of L. pseudotheobromae (Alves et al. 2008) and therefore confirmed as L. pseudotheobromae causing Chinese hackberry canker.
Fig. 3

Colony characteristics for L. pseudotheobromae isolate Ls7. a 4-day-old white to light-cream colony. b 7-day-old dark gray colonies, fluffy aerial mycelium. c Pycnidia produced under an ultraviolet lamp. d Liquid secretions may mark the open position of the conidia

Fig. 4

Conidial morphological characteristics for L. pseudotheobromae isolate Ls7 seen under the light microscope. a Pycnidia. b Paraphyses. c, d Conidiogenous cell. d, e Conidiophore (red star). f Hyaline, aseptic conidia. fh Septate, melanin deposits on the inner surface of the wall arranged longitudinally giving a striate appearance to the conidia. i A condium with partial germ tube (Bars = 10 µm)

Table 1

Conidia measurement of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae isolates from Chinese hackberry and comparison with previous studies

Isolate

Host

Mean ± SD (µm)

L/W

Source

Ls7

Chinese hackberry

25.2 ± 2.6 × 14.4 ± 2.4

1.7

This study

HMQAU 140073

Blueberry

25.7 ± 1.6 × 14.2 ± 1.4

1.7

Wang et al. (2016)

Type

Gmelina arborea

28 ± 2.5 × 16 ± 1.2

1.7 ± 0.2

Alves et al. (2008)

Fig. 5

Fungus isolate Ls7 a unique dark pink colony under incubation at 35 °C. a Colony on white background. b Colony on black background

Molecular identification of pathogen

After PCR amplification, the Ls7 isolate with primers ITS1/ITS4, EF1-1251r/EF1-688f, BT2a/BT2b and rpb2-LasR/rpb2-LasF, segment sizes of 544, 315, 462 and 532 bp were acquired, respectively. The sequence accession numbers in GenBank were registered as MH454038.1, MH746713, MK041547 and MK069598, respectively. The ITS sequence of the test pathogen revealed 100% homology with L. pseudotheobromae in GenBank of BLAST search.

Before the establishment of phylogenetic trees with four groups of gene links, two tree-building methods were used to sequence and analyze individual gene sequences. There were no obvious conflicts in a single gene phylogeny and the ITS, tef1-α, TUB and rpb2 datasets can be amalgamated. Sequences downloaded from NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) were then used to carry out cluster analysis (Dou et al. 2017). The Diplodia mutila isolate CMW7060 was selected as an out-group (Table 2).
Table 2

GenBank accession numbers for ITS, tef1-α, TUB and RPB2 sequence data for Lasiodiplodia species used in this study

Species

Cultures

GenBank

Locality

ITS

tef1-α

TUB

RPB2

L. avicenniae

CMW41467

KP860835

KP860680

KP860758

KU587878

South Africa

avicenniae

LAS199

KU587957

KU587947

KU587868

KU587880

South Africa

L. bruguierae

CMW41470

KP860833

KP860678

KP860756

KU587875

South Africa

L. bruguierae

CMW42480

KP860832

KP860677

KP860755

KU587876

South Africa

L. chinensis

CGMCC3.18061

KX499889

KX499927

KX500002

KX499965

China

L. citricola

IRAN1522C

GU945354

GU945340

KU887505

KU696351

Iran

L. citricola

IRAN1521C

GU945353

GU945339

KU887504

KU696350

Iran

L. crassispora

WAC12533

DQ103550

DQ103557

KU887506

KU696353

Australia

L. crassispora

CMW13488

DQ103552

DQ103559

KU887507

KU696352

Venezuela

L. gilanensis

IRAN1523C

GU945351

GU945342

KU887511

KU696357

Iran

L. gilanensis

IRAN1501C

GU945352

GU945341

KU887510

KU696356

Iran

L. gonubiensis

CMW14077

AY639595

DQ103566

DQ458860

KU696359

South Africa

L. gonubiensis

CMW14078

AY639594

DQ103567

EU673126

KU696358

South Africa

L. hormozganensis

IRAN1500C

GU945355

GU945343

KU887515

KU696361

Iran

L. hormozganensis

IRAN1498C

GU945356

GU945344

KU887514

KU696360

Iran

L. mahajangana

CMW27801

FJ900595

FJ900641

FJ900630

KU696365

Madagascar

L. mahajangana

CMW27818

FJ900596

FJ900642

FJ900631

KU696366

Madagascar

L. iraniensis

IRAN1520C

GU945348

GU945336

KU887516

KU696363

Iran

L. iraniensis

IRAN1502C

GU945347

GU945335

KU887517

KU696362

Iran

L. mediterranea

CBS 137,783

KJ638312

KJ638331

KU887521

KU696368

Italy

L. mediterranea

CBS 137,784

KJ638311

KJ638330

KU887522

KU696369

Italy

L. missouriana

UCD2193MO

HQ288225

HQ288267

HQ288304

KU696370

USA

L. missouriana

UCD2199MO

HQ288226

HQ288268

HQ288305

KU696371

USA

L. parva

CBS 456.78

EF622083

EF622063

KU887523

KU696372

Colombia

L. parva

CBS 494.78

EF622084

EF622064

EU673114

KU696373

Colombia

L. plurivora

STE-U 5803

EF445362

EF445395

KU887524

KU696374

South Africa

L. plurivora

STE-U 4583

AY343482

EF445396

KU887525

KU696375

South Africa

L. pseudotheobromae

CBS 116,459

EF622077

EF622057

EU673111

KU696376

Costa Rica

L. pseudotheobromae

UFRPE CFS 048

MG870583

MG870575

MG870603

MG870613

Pernambuco/Paraiba

L. pseudotheobromae

CGMCC 3.18047

KX499876

KX499914

KX499989

KX499952

China

L. pseudotheobromae

Ls7 (this study)

MH454038

MH746713

MK041547

MK069598

China

L. pyriformis

CBS121770

EU101307

EU101352

KU887527

KU696378

Namibia

L. rubropurpurea

WAC12535

DQ103553

DQ103571

EU673136

KU696380

Australia

L. rubropurpurea

WAC12536

DQ103554

DQ103572

KU887530

KU696381

Australia

L. theobromae

CBS 164.96

AY640255

AY640258

KU887532

KU696383

Papua New Guinea

L. theobromae

CBS 111,530

EF622074

EF622054

KU887531

KU696382

Unknown

L. venezuelensis

WAC12539

DQ103547

DQ103568

KU887533

KU696384

Venezuela

L. viticola

UCD 2553AR

HQ288227

HQ288269

HQ288306

KU696385

USA

L. viticola

UCD 2604MO

HQ288228

HQ288270

HQ288307

KU696386

USA

L. vitis

CBS 124,060

KX464148

KX464642

KX464917

KX463994

Italy

Diplodia mutila

CMW 7060

AY236955

AY236904

AY236933

EU339574

Netherlands

Extype isolates were in bold (Dou et al. 2017)

A phylogenetic tree based on ITS, tef1-α, TUB and RPB2 sequences was constructed by cluster analysis of the gene sequences of the test pathogen and other Lasiodiplodia species complex strains (number of sites = 410, bootstrap replicates = 1000). The results show that isolates of Lasiodiplodia sp. were clearly divided into several clades or groups with a common ancestor representing different species within Lasiodiplodia. The test isolate showed high homology with L. pseudotheobromae (Fig. 6). Therefore, the isolate was confirmed to be L. pseudotheobromae on the grounds of molecular identification.
Fig. 6

Phylogenetic tree based on combined rDNA-ITS, tef1-α, TUB and RPB2 gene sequences of Chinese hackberry Lasiodiplodia stem canker pathogen and related fungi. Bootstrap support values from 1000 bootstrap replications are showed. Outgroup: Diplodia mutila

Discussion

Based on available knowledge, this is the first report of Chinese hackberry stem canker disease caused by L. pseudotheobromae in China. The twigs and stems of all infected seedlings became cankerous and turned black, which was devastating to Chinese hackberry plantations.

Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae is important in agriculture and forestry as it causes cankers, stem-end rot, dieback and fruit rot (Sakalidis et al. 2011; Ismail et al. 2012; Marques et al. 2013). These diseases lead to bark discolouration, browning of medullary tissue, a decline in growth, and drying of leaves on upper branches. In severe cases, they may even lead to plant death (Alves et al. 2004), resulting in considerable economic losses. The pathogen overwinters in the soil, and in the summer of the following year, conidia and conidiomata are spread by wind and rain (Yee et al. 2019).

Worldwide, this species has a wide range. L. pseudotheobromae is an aggressive species in Australia, Cameroon, Egypt, Brazil, Mexico, China and other countries (Begoude et al. 2010; Sakalidis et al. 2011; Ismail et al. 2012; Maricarmen et al. 2013; Coutinho et al. 2016). In China, it is mainly distributed in central and eastern portions of the country, including Beijing, Jiangsu, Hubei, Sichuan, and Shandong (Li and Li 2015).

At the same time, it has a wide range of hosts. It causes stem-end rot or dieback in branches of mango (Kwon et al. 2017), papaya stem-end rot (Netto et al. 2014), English walnut stem canker (Li et al. 2016), blueberry dieback (Wang et al. 2016), pedicel and peduncle discoloration of grapes (Dissanayake et al. 2015), and Eucalyptus cankers (Chen et al. 2011) in China. In addition, it also can infect Acacia confusa Merr (Dou et al. 2017), Anacardium occidentale L., Citrus, Coffea and Gmelina species (Phillips et al. 2008; Abdollahzadeh et al. 2010; Perez et al. 2010; Sakalidis et al. 2011; Slippers et al. 2014; Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2015; Coutinho et al. 2016), Albizia falcataria (L.), Paulownia spp., Mangifera sylvatica, Eucalyptus spp. and grapevine etc. (Alves et al. 2008; Zhao et al. 2010; Dissanayake et al. 2015).

This study focused on a Chinese hackberry canker disease outbreak between July and August. The maximum temperature tolerated by L. pseudotheobromae was 54 °C this resistance to high temperatures enables it to survive during the summer months. The disease spreads rapidly and is most severe during summers when temperatures reaches 30 °C and above (Zhang 2012). In other seasons the disease is less aggressive (Wu et al. 2018).

Conidia exist all year-round but are rarely detected in winter (Xu et al. 2014). The pathogen overwinters in the diseased twigs or soil and becomes the source of infection the following year, with spores travelling by means of wind, rain and insects (Wu et al. 2001). The pycnidia or fruiting body of the fungus is produced near the canker before spreading to neighboring hosts. Pathogens commonly enter the plant through wounds left by pruning of twigs and this may be the main reason for the spread of the disease. The presence of the disease cannot be ignored as it leads to significant economic losses in forestry and agriculture (Wang 2016). Therefore, control measures should be carried out in the early stage of discovery of the disease.

In the genus Lasiodiplodia, L. pseudotheobromae is phylogenetically close to L. theobromae (Li et al. 2018). Although they are closely related, the size and shape of L. pseudotheobromae conidia differ from those of L. theobromae which are larger and have orbicular ends (Alves et al 2008). In addition, L. pseudotheobromae can also grow at 10 °C and form deep-pink colonies at 35 °C but L. theobromae does not (Marques et al. 2013; Netto et al. 2014). The fungal samples categorized as Ls7 type in this study showed similar features with L. pseudotheobromae and was consistent with these characteristics.

Based on the phylogenetic relationship of β-tubulin, Cheng (2012) concluded that the sexual stage of L. pseudotheobromae may be Botryosphaeria rhodina. In 2016, Tennakoon et al. (2016) found the sexual morph of L. pseudotheobromae collected from dead leaves of Plukenetia volubilis L. (Euphorbiaceae) in Yunnan Province, China. Using phylogenetic analyses based on ITS and tef1-α sequence data, they authenticated the sexual-asexual connection in L. pseudotheobromae. It was the first evidence in molecular genetics of a sexual morph for this species. However, the sexual morph of the Ls7 isolate was not found in this study.

Conclusions

This is the first report of hackberry canker in China and Chinese hackberry (C. sinensis) is a new host of L. pseudotheobromae. The occurrence of the disease should be closely monitored and preventative measures put in place to avoid the spread of the disease. This study may provide reference value for the prevention of Chinese hackberry canker.

Notes

References

  1. Abdollahzadeh J, Javadi A, Mohammadi Goltapeh E, Zare R, Phillips AJL (2010) Phylogeny and morphology of four new species of Lasiodiplodia from Iran. Persoonia 25(1):1–10PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves A, Correia ACM, Luque J, Phillips AJL (2004) Botryosphaeria corticola, sp. nov. on Quercus species, with notes and description of Botryosphaeria stevensii and its anamorph, Diplodia mutila. Mycologia 96(3):598–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves A, Crous PW, Correia A, Phillips AJL (2008) Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal Divers 28(2):1–13Google Scholar
  4. Begoude BAD, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2010) Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Terminalia catappa in Cameroon, South Africa and Madagascar. Mycol Prog 9(1):101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berbegal M, Pérez-Sierra A, Armengol J (2012) First report of Sirosporium celtidis causing a foliar disease of European hackberry in Spain. Plant Dis 96(12):1826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cacciola SO (2000) A foliar disease of European hackberry endemic in Sicily. Plant Dis 84(4):492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao WJ (2017) Based on the analysis of Chinese hackberry maintenance technology in winter. NONGJIA KEJI 9:211Google Scholar
  8. Chen SF, Pavlic-Zupanc D, Roux J, Slippers B, Xie YJ, Wingfield MJ, Zhou XD (2011) Characterization of Botryosphaeriaceae from plantation-grown Eucalyptus species in South China. Plant Pathol 60(4):739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng YL (2012) Phylogeny of some Botryosphaeriaceae species and genetic diversity of type Botryosphaeria dothidea in China. Ph.D. dissertation, Chinese Academy of Forestry, pp 1–101Google Scholar
  10. Correia K, Silva MA, De Morais MA, Armengol J, Phillips AJL, Camara MPS, Michereff SJ (2016) Phylogeny, distribution and pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodia species associated with dieback of table grape in the main Brazilian exporting region. Plant Pathol 65(1):92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coutinho IBL, Freire FCO, Lima CS, Lima JS, Goncalves FJT, Machado AR, Silva AMS, Cardoso JE (2016) Diversity of genus Lasiodiplodia associated with perennial tropical fruit plants in northeastern Brazil. Plant Pathol 66(1):90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruywagen CW, Brisson GJ, Tremblay GF, Meissner HH (2016) Effect of curd suppression in a milk replacer on physiological parameters in calves. I digestibility of nutrients and body mass-gain. S Afr J Anim Sci 20:234–238Google Scholar
  13. Dai SL, Lin J, Gao L (2007) Brief report on antibacterial activity of penicillin and streptomycin in PDA medium. Edible Fungi China 26(04):53–54Google Scholar
  14. Dissanayake AJ, Zhang W, Liu M, Chukeatirote E, Ye J, Li XH, Hyde KD (2015) Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae causes pedicel and peduncle discolouration of grapes in China. Australas Plant Dis Notes 10(1):21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dou ZP, He W, Zhang Y (2017) Lasiodiplodia chinensis, a new holomorphic species from China. Mycosphere 8(4):521–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1323–1330PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismail AM, Cirvilleri G, Polizzi G, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Lombard L (2012) Lasiodiplodia species associated with dieback disease of mango (Mangifera indica) in Egypt. Australas Plant Pathol 41:649–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kwon JH, Choi O, Kang B, Lee Y, Park J, Kang DW, Han I, Kim J (2017) Identification of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae causing mango dieback in Korea. Can J Plant Pathol 39:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee CK, Lee SH, Seo ST, Cho SE, Shin HD (2019) First report of powdery mildew caused by Pleochaeta shiraiana on Celtis biondii in Korea. Plant Dis 103(6):1429–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li X, Li WY (2015) Biodiversity of Lasiodiplodia species in China. In: Proceedings of annual conference of the Chinese Society of Mycology, 2015Google Scholar
  21. Li GQ, Liu FF, Li JQ, Liu QL, Chen SF (2016) Characterization of Botryosphaeria dothidea and Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae from English walnut in China. J Phytopathol 164(5):348–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li GQ, Liu FF, Li JQ, Liu QL, Chen SF (2018) Botryosphaeriaceae from eucalyptus plantations and adjacent plants in China. Persoonia 40:63–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luongo L, Haegi A, Galli M, Berti S, Vitale S, Belisario A (2015) First report of Phytophthora megasperma causing decline and death on Celtis australis in Italy. Plant Dis 99(1):155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maricarmen S, Angel DN, Sandoval-Islas JS, Ortiz DT, Orozco-Santos M, Silva-Rojas HV (2013) Hongos asociados a pudrición del pedúnculo y muerte descendente del mango (Mangifera indica L.). Agrociencia 47(1):61–73Google Scholar
  25. Marques MW, Lima NB, Morais Júnior MAD, Barbosa MAG, Souza BO, Michereff SJ, Phillips AJL, Câmara MPS (2013) Species of Lasiodiplodia associated with mango in Brazil. Fungal Divers 61(1):181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Netto MSB, Assuncao IP, Lima GSA, Marques MW, Lima WG, Monteiro JHA, Balbino VQ, Michereff SJ, Phillips AJL, Camara MPS (2014) Species of Lasiodiplodia associated with papaya stem-end rot in Brazil. Fungal Divers 67(1):127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pavlic D (2004) Botryosphaeria species on native South African Syzygium cordatum and their potential threat to Eucalyptus. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, pp 1–130Google Scholar
  28. Perez CA, Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Altier NA, Blanchette RA (2010) Endophytic and canker-associated Botryosphaeriaceae occurring on non-native Eucalyptus and native Myrtaceae trees in Uruguay. Fungal Divers 41:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips AJL, Alves A, Pennycook SR, Johnston PR, Ramaley A, Akulov A, Crous PW (2008) Resolving the phylogenetic and taxonomic status of dark-spored teleomorph genera in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Persoonia 21:29–55PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips AJL, Alves A, Abdollahzadeh J, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW (2013) The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture. Stud Mycol 76:51–167PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
  32. Sakalidis ML, Hardy GESJ, Burgess TI (2011) Endophytes as potential pathogens of the baobab species Adansonia gregorii: a focus on the Botryosphaeriaceae. Fungal Ecol 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Slippers B, Roux J, Wingfield MJ, van der Walt FJJ, Jami F, Mehl JWM, Marais GJ (2014) Confronting the constraints of morphological taxonomy in the Botryosphaeriales. Persoonia 33:155–168PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) Mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tennakoon DS, Phillips AJL, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD (2016) Sexual morph of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae (Botryosphaeriaceae, Botryosphaeriales, Dothideomycetes) from China. Mycosphere 7(7):990–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trakunyingcharoen T, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Cheewangkoon R, To-anun C, Crous PW (2015) Caulicolous Botryosphaeriales from Thailand. Persoonia 34:87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang XY (2016) The identification of pathogens for 17 fungal diseases of 14 ornamental plants. Ph.D. dissertation, South China Agricultural University, pp 1–58Google Scholar
  38. Wang JN, Zhao HH, Yu YY, Li XD, Liang C, Li BD (2016) The pathogen causing Lasiodiplodia twig blight of blueberry. Mycosystema 35:657–665Google Scholar
  39. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1994) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc 38:315–322Google Scholar
  40. Wu XQ, He YQ, Liu ZH (2001) Occurrence and progress on tree cankers caused by Botryosphaeria spp. J Nanjing For Univ 25(1):61–66Google Scholar
  41. Wu HR, Li ZP, Sun XYQ, Zhang Y, Ding JY, Cheng LL (2018) Identification and biological characteristics of the pathogen causing stinking root rot of rubber tree. Chin J Trop Crops 39(5):940–947Google Scholar
  42. Xu CN, Chi FM, Ji ZR, Dong QL, Zhang HJ, Cao KQ, Zhou ZS (2014) Research progress of Botryosphaeriaceae with dieback of blueberry. China Fruits 5:71–74Google Scholar
  43. Yee JK, Latiffah Z, Masratul HM (2019) Lasiodiplodia species associated with Sansevieria trifasciata leaf blight in Malaysia. J Gen Plant Pathol 85:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang L (2012) Global forest pest health profile: a case study under the global forest resources assessment 2005. China Agricultural Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang YH, Wei DS, Xing LJ, Li MC (2008) A modified method for isolating DNA from fungus. Microbiology 3:466–469Google Scholar
  46. Zhao JP, Lu Q, Liang J, Decock C, Zhang XY (2010) Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, a new record of pathogenic fungus from some subtropical and tropical trees in southern China. Cryptogam Mycol 31(4):431–439Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of ForestryNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations