Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 2051–2060 | Cite as

Nutritive value of introduced bamboo species in the northwestern Himalayas, India

  • D. R. BhardwajEmail author
  • P. Sharma
  • R. Bishist
  • M. R. Navale
  • R. Kaushal
Original Paper
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Bamboos are used extensively for a variety of purposes, and many new species have been introduced to the northwestern Himalaya. However, their potential as a fodder species has not been investigated. Six bamboo species, namely Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Gamble, Dendrocalamus asper (Schult. and Schult.f.) Backer ex K. Heyne, Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz, Phyllostachys aurea Riviére and C. Riviére, Phyllostachys bambusoides Sieb and Zucc. and Phyllostachys pubescens (Pradelle) Mazel ex J. Houz. were evaluated for their nutritional value, relative palatability and best lopping time. Dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE), and crude fibre varied from (37.0–67.7)%, (4.7–7.6), and (22.1–37.9)%, respectively. Values of crude protein ranged from (12.2–17.1)%, total ash (TA) from (11.8–21.5)%, acid insoluble ash (AIA) from (0.3–0.5)%, nitrogen free extract from (31.1–40.8)%, carbohydrates from (57.0–69.0)%, organic matter (OM) from (78.5–88.2)%, calcium from (1.7–2.3)%, phosphorus from (0.4–0.8)%, potassium from, (0.9–1.6)%, magnesium from (0.5–0.9)%, sodium from (603.7–1072.7) × 10−6 and vitamin A from (21.1–30.5) × 10−2 mg/g, respectively. D. hamiltonii had maximum values for DM, EE, TA and AIA. OM and vitamin A were highest in M. baccifera. CF and carbohydrates were maximized in P. aurea and CP in P. pubescens. All the values obtained for different bamboo species were less than maximum tolerable concentration of common feed resources of the region thereby indicating their suitability for nutrition and palatability. The contents of anti-nutritional factors, namely hydrocyanic acid and tannin ranged from (33.8–61.7) × 10−2 mg/g and (0.7–1.9)%, respectively. P. pubescens was the best species from a palatability point of view and has maximum crude protein content (17.2%), Ca (2.3%) and lowest tannin content (0.7%). The relative palatability of introduced bamboo species followed trend: P. pubescens (97.6%) > D. hamiltonii (92.5%) > P. bambusoides (81.2%) > D. asper (76.9%) > M. baccifera (75.9%) > P. aurea (73.4%). The optimum months for lopping these species for green leaves are November and December, as the nutritional value declines sharply thereafter.

Keywords

Anti-nutritional values Nutritional values Bamboo Chemical composition Mineral nutrients Palatability Lopping time 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and suggestions that helped in the improvement of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11676_2018_750_MOESM1_ESM.docx (40 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 39 kb)

References

  1. Ahn JH, Robertson DM, Elliot R, Gutheridge RC, Ford CW (1989) Quality assessment of tropical browse legumes, tannin content and protein degradation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 27(1–2):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alban DH (1985) Seasonal changes in nutrient concentration and content of Aspen suckers in Minnesota. For Sci 31(3):785–794Google Scholar
  3. Anele OY, Arigbede OM, Olanite JA, Adekunle IO, Jolasho AO, Onifade OS, Oni AO (2008) Early growth and seasonal chemical composition of three multipurpose tree species. Agrofor Syst 17(2):1107–1111Google Scholar
  4. Antwi-Boasiako C, Coffie GY, Darkwa NA (2011) Proximate composition of the leaves of Bambusa ventricosa, Oxytenanthera abyssinica and two varieties of Bambusa vulgaris. Sci Res Essays 6(34):6835–6839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. AOAC (1990) Official method of analysis. Animal feeds, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  6. Ben Salem H, Smith T (2008) Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Rumin Res 77(2–3):174–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhandari MS, Kaushal R, Banik RL, Tewari S (2015) Genetic evaluation of nutritional and fodder quality of different bamboo species. Indian For 141(3):265–274Google Scholar
  8. Burns JC, Cope WA (1974) Nutritive value of crown vetch forage as influenced by stratial constituents and phenolic and tannin compounds. Agron J 66(2):195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chander D, Niranjan M, Chhabra A, Dhiman KR (2006) Nutritional evaluation of different bamboo leaves of Tripura. Indian J Dairy Sci 59(3):376–379Google Scholar
  10. Chandra J, Mali MC (2014) Nutritional evaluation of top five fodder tree leaves of Mimosaceae family of arid region of Rajasthan. Int J Innov Res Rev 2(1):23–34Google Scholar
  11. Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1961) Methods of analysis for soils, plants, and waters. Riverside Press, Cambridge, p 309Google Scholar
  12. Datt C, Datta MP, Singh MP (2008) Assessment of fodder quality of leaves of multipurpose trees in subtropical humid climate of India. J For Res 19(3):209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duck JA, Atchly A (1986) Handbook of proximate analysis tables of higher plants. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, pp 531–537Google Scholar
  14. Evans J (1979) The effect of leaf position and leaf age in foliar analysis of Gmelina arborea. Plant Soil 52(4):547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guha MM, Mitchell RL (1966) The trace and major elemental composition of the leaves of some deciduous trees. Plant Soil 24(1):90–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halvorson JJ, Cassida KA, Turner KE (2010) Nutritive value of bamboo as browse for livestock. Renew Agric Food Syst 9:241–245Google Scholar
  17. Henry DA, Moore G, Dynes RA (2002) Variability in nutritive value allows better selection of perennial pasture legumes. Aust J Anim Prod 2(6):74–78Google Scholar
  18. Huang P (1985) Study on the mineral nutrition of Phyllostachyspubescens. In: Rao AN, Dhanarajan G, Sastry CB (eds) Recent research on bamboos. Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, pp 99–109Google Scholar
  19. Jha AN, Chaturvedi OP (1990) Seasonal variations in dry matter and nutrients in the leaves of Bauhinia variegata and Dendrocalamus strictus. Range Manag Agrofor 11(2):207–212Google Scholar
  20. Juma HK, Abdulrazak SA, Muinga RW, Ambula MK (2006) Evaluation of Clitoria, Gliricida and Mucuna as nitrogen supplement to Napier grass basal diet in relation to season and their performance in lactating Jersey cow. Livest. Sci. 103(1–2):23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawas JR, Andrade MH, Lu CD (2010) Strategic nutrient supplementation of free ranging goats. Small Rumin Res 89(2–3):234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar S (2010). Studies on distribution, growth and biological yield potential of bamboos in Himachal Pradesh. Thesis Ph.D., Dr. Y S Parmar, Nauni, Solan (HP), India, University of Horticulture and Forestry, p 161Google Scholar
  23. Makkar HP (1992) Vanilin–HCl method for condensed tannins: effect of organic solvent used for extraction of tannin. J Sci Food Agric 52(3):287–288Google Scholar
  24. Mandal TN, Gautam TP (2012) Chemical analysis of fodder tree leaves found in Sunsari district, Nepal. Bibechana 8:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Agriculture (2012) 19th livestock census-2012. Annual report of Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and FisheriesGoogle Scholar
  26. Mueller Harvey I, McAllan AB (1992) Tannins: their biochemistry and nutritional properties. Adv Plant Cell Biochem Biotechnol 1:151–217Google Scholar
  27. Narayan TR, Dabadghao PM (1972) Forage crop of India. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 294–308Google Scholar
  28. Nordheim-Viken H, Volden H (2009) Effect of maturity stage, nitrogen fertilization and seasonal variation on ruminal characteristics of neutral detergent fibre in timothy (Phleum pretense L.). Anim Feed Sci Technol 149:30–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NRC (National Research Council) (1989) Nutrient requirement of domestic cattle. National Academy of Science. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Overview of mineral nutrition in cattle: dairy and beef. National Academy of Science. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Owokotomo IA, Owoeye G (2011) Proximate analysis and antimicrobial activities of Bambusa vulgaris leaves beverage. Afr J Agric Res 6(21):5030–5032Google Scholar
  32. Pandey KK (1975) Importance of fodder trees and trees fodder in Nepal. M.Sc. Thesis, Switzerland Institute of Plant Production, Federal Technology University, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  33. Pasha TN, Prigge EC, Russell RW, Bryan WB (1994) Influence of moisture content of forage diets on intake and digestion by sheep. J Anim Sci 79(2):2455–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pokhriyal OM, Anele UY, Jolaosho AO, Onifade OS, Olanite JA, Wahab TA (1992) Seasonal chemical composition and in-vitro gas production of different bamboo species. Anim Feed Sci Technol 154(1):47–57Google Scholar
  35. Poudyal P (1993) Aanalyse divers nutriments des feuilles de Bambusa tulda, Dendrocalamus spp. J Am Bamboo Soc 10:27Google Scholar
  36. Purohit GR (1987) Nutritive value of some plants of arid zone of Rajasthan. J Anim Sci 1:83–84Google Scholar
  37. Ralhan PK, Singh Surendra P (1987) Dynamics of nutrients and leaf mass in central Himalayan forest trees and shrubs. Ecology 68(10–12):1974–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saha RC, Singh RB, Saha RN, Chaudhary AB (1997) Feed resources and the milk production in eastern region. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, pp 1–164Google Scholar
  39. Sahoo A, Ogra RK, Sood A, Ahuja PS (2009) Chemical composition and nutritive value of leaves from different Bamboo cultivars. Indian J Anim Nutr 26(4):306–314Google Scholar
  40. Sahoo A, Ogra RK, Sood A, Ahuja PS (2010) Nutritional evaluation of bamboo cultivars in sub-Himalayan region of India by chemical composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Grassl Sci 56(2):116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santis G, De Lannucci A, Dantone D, Chiaravalle E (2004) Changes during growth in the nutritive value of components of berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrium L.) under different cutting treatments in Mediterranean region. Grass Forage Sci 59(4):378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selvan T (1995) Collection and screening of Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Neeset Arn ex Murno Germplasm. M. Sc. Thesis, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, p 135Google Scholar
  43. Sen KC (1978) Nutritive value of indian cattle feeds and feeding of farm animals, 7th edn. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  44. Sharma DD (1968) Chemical composition of bamboo leaves. Agra Univ J Res 5:253–258Google Scholar
  45. Sharma DD, Gill RS, Chander S, Negi SS (1986) Chemical composition of some tree leaves in Kangra district. J Res 3:438–442Google Scholar
  46. Singh RV (1982) Fodder trees of India. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, p 663Google Scholar
  47. Soest V (1994) Nutritional ecology of ruminants. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thorne PJ, Subba DB, Walker DH, Thapa B, Wood CD, Sinclair FI (1999) The basis of indigenous knowledge of tree fodder quality and its implications for improving the use of tree fodder in developing countries. Anim Feed Sci Technol 81:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tinworth TRH, Barry TN, Wilson PR (1999) The effect of wilting chicory on its voluntary intake and digestion by red deer. J Agric Sci 133(2):217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tolsma DJ, Ernst WHO, Verweij RA, Voojis R (1987) Seasonal variation on nutrient concentration in a semi-arid savannah ecosystem in Botswana. J Ecol 75(3):755–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verma KS, Mishra VK (1999) Foliage nutrient concentration and lopping time of agroforestry tree species in the western Himalayan region of India. Agrofor Syst 42(3):283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verma KS, Mishra VK, Sharma SK, Nautiyal RK (1992) Nutrient dynamics in Celtis australis leaves. Adv Hortic For 2:194–199Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Bhardwaj
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Sharma
    • 1
  • R. Bishist
    • 1
  • M. R. Navale
    • 1
  • R. Kaushal
    • 2
  1. 1.Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and ForestrySolanIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water ConservationDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations