Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Analysis of PM2.5 concentrations in Heilongjiang Province associated with forest cover and other factors

  • Yu Zheng
  • San Li
  • Chuanshan Zou
  • Xiaojian MaEmail author
  • Guocai Zhang
Original Paper


Atmospheric particulate matter (PM2.5) seriously influences air quality. It is considered one of the main environmental triggers for lung and heart diseases. Air pollutants can be adsorbed by forest. In this study we investigated the effect of forest cover on urban PM2.5 concentrations in 12 cities in Heilongjiang Province, China. The forest cover in each city was constant throughout the study period. The average daily concentration of PM2.5 in 12 cities was below 75 μg/m3 during the non-heating period but exceeded this level during heating period. Furthermore, there were more moderate pollution days in six cities. This indicated that forests had the ability to reduce the concentration of PM2.5 but the main cause of air pollution was excessive human interference and artificial heating in winter. We classified the 12 cities according to the average PM2.5 concentrations. The relationship between PM2.5 concentrations and forest cover was obtained by integrating forest cover, land area, heated areas and number of vehicles in cities. Finally, considering the complexity of PM2.5 formation and based on the theory of random forestry, we selected six cities and analyzed their meteorological and air pollutant data. The main factors affecting PM2.5 concentrations were PM10, NO2, CO and SO2 in air pollutants while meteorological factors were secondary.


Forest cover Heilongjiang Province Influencing factor PM2.5 concentrations Random forest 



We would like to thank the native English-speaking scientists of Elixigen Company (Huntington Beach, California) for editing our manuscript.


  1. Abbey DE, Ostro BE, Petersen F, Burchette RJ (1995) Chronic respiratory symptoms associated with estimated long-term ambient concentrations of fine particulates less-than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and other air-pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 5(2):137–159Google Scholar
  2. Baccini A, Laporte N, Goetz SJ, Sun M, Dong H (2008) A first map of tropical Africa’s above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery. Environ Res Lett 3(4):2272–2280Google Scholar
  3. Baker K, Scheff P (2007) Photochemical model performance for PM2.5 sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and precursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at background monitor locations in the central and eastern United States. Atmos Environ 41(29):6185–6195Google Scholar
  4. Beaver S, Palazoglu A, Singh A, Soong ST, Tanrikulu S (2010) Identification of weather patterns impacting 24-h average fine particulate matter pollution. Atmos Environ 44(14):1761–1771Google Scholar
  5. Becker JS, Bellis D, Staton I, McLeod CW, Dombovari J, Becker JS (2000) Determination of trace elements including platinum in tree bark by ICP mass spectrometry. Fresenius’ J Anal Chem 368(5):490–495Google Scholar
  6. Boldo E, Medina S, LeTertre A, Hurley F, Muecke HG, Ballester F, Aguilera I, Eilstein D, Apheis G (2006) Apheis: health impact assessment of long-term exposure to PM2.5 in 23 European cities. Eur J Epidemiol 21(6):449–458Google Scholar
  7. Caggiano R, Fiore S, Lettino A, Macchiato M, Sabia S, Trippetta S (2011) PM2.5 measurements in a Mediterranean site: two typical cases. Atmos Res 102(1–2):157–166Google Scholar
  8. Che H, Xia X, Zhu J, Wang H, Wang Y, Sun J, Zhang X, Shi G (2015) Aerosol optical properties under the condition of heavy haze over an urban site of Beijing, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(2):1043–1053Google Scholar
  9. Chung YS, Kim HS, Chun Y (2014) On large-scale transport of dust storms and anthropogenic dust-falls over east Asia observed in central Korea in 2009. Asia Pac J Atmos Sci 50(3):345–354Google Scholar
  10. Cutler DR Jr, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88(11):2783–2792Google Scholar
  11. Dan M, Zhuang GS, Li XX, Tao HR, Zhuang YH (2004) The characteristics of carbonaceous species and their sources in PM2.5 in Beijing. Atmos Environ 38(21):3443–3452Google Scholar
  12. Ding AJ, Wang T, Thouret V, Cammas JP, Nedelec P (2008) Tropospheric ozone climatology over Beijing: analysis of aircraft data from the MOZAIC program. Atmos Chem Phys 8(1):1–13Google Scholar
  13. Escobedo FJ, Nowak DJ (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Lands Urban Plan 90(3–4):102–110Google Scholar
  14. Escobedo PJ, Wagner JE, Nowak DJ, De la Maza CL, Rodriguez M, Crane DE (2008) Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile’s policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. J Environ Manag 86(1):148–157Google Scholar
  15. Fan Z, Meng Q, Weisel C, Laumbach R, Ohman-Strickland P, Shalat S, Hernandez MZ, Black K (2009) Acute exposure to elevated PM2.5 generated by traffic and cardiopulmonary health effects in healthy older adults. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19(5):525–533Google Scholar
  16. Franklin M, Zeka A, Schwartz J (2007) Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 27 US communities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17(3):279–287Google Scholar
  17. Hossain KMA, Easa SM (2012) Pollutant dispersion characteristics in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Asia Pac J Atmos Sci 48(1):35–41Google Scholar
  18. Hsu CH, Cheng FY (2016) Classification of weather patterns to study the influence of meteorological characteristics on PM2.5 concentrations in Yunlin County, Taiwan. Atmos Environ 144:397–408Google Scholar
  19. Khan MB, Masiol M, Formenton G, Di Gilio A, de Gennaro G, Agostinelli C, Pavoni B (2016) Carbonaceous PM2.5 and secondary organic aerosol across the Veneto region (NE Italy). Sci Total Environ 542:172–181Google Scholar
  20. Kulshrestha A, Bisht DS, Masih J, Massey D, Tiwari S, Taneja A (2009) Chemical characterization of water-soluble aerosols in different residential environments of semi aridregion of India. J Atmos Chem 62(2):121–138Google Scholar
  21. Majumdar D, Majhi BK, Dutta A, Mandal R, Jash T (2015) Study on possible economic and environmental impacts of electric vehicle infrastructure in public road transport in Kolkata. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(4):1093–1101Google Scholar
  22. Ni XY, Huang H, Du WP (2017) Relevance analysis and short-term prediction of PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing based on multi-source data. Atmos Environ 150:146–161Google Scholar
  23. Palencia JCG, Araki M, Shiga S (2016) Energy, environmental and economic impact of mini-sized and zero-emission vehicle diffusion on a light-duty vehicle fleet. Appl Energy 181:96–109Google Scholar
  24. Perrone MG, Larsen BR, Ferrero L, Sangiorgi G, De Gennaro G, Udisti R, Zangrando R, Gambaro A, Bolzacchini E (2012) Sources of high PM2.5 concentrations in Milan, Northern Italy: molecular marker data and CMB modelling. Sci Total Environ 414:343–355Google Scholar
  25. Powe NA, Willis KG (2004) Mortality and morbidity benefits of air pollution (SO2 and PM10) absorption attributable to woodland in Britain. J Environ Manag 70(2):119–128Google Scholar
  26. Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9(2):181–199Google Scholar
  27. Sun F, Lun X, Liu X, Mo L, Li R, Zhang H, Chen J, Cao Y, Shi F, Yu X (2016) Analysis of organic and elemental carbon in heating and non-heating periods in four locations of Beijing. Environ Technol 37(1):121–128Google Scholar
  28. Tai APK, Mickley LJ, Jacob DJ (2010) Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. Atmos Environ 44(32):3976–3984Google Scholar
  29. Tan CH, Zhao TL, Cui CG, Luo BL, Zhang L, Bai YQ (2015) Characterization of haze pollution over Central China during the past 50 years. China Environ Sci 35(8):2272–2280Google Scholar
  30. Wang J, Ogawa S (2015) Effects of Meteorological Conditions on PM2.5 Concentrations in Nagasaki, Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(8):9089–9101Google Scholar
  31. Wang T, Jiang F, Deng J, Shen Y, Fu Q, Wang Q, Fu Y, Xu J, Zhang D (2012) Urban air quality and regional haze weather forecast for Yangtze River Delta region. Atmos Environ 58:70–83Google Scholar
  32. Wang J, Wang Y, Liu H, Yang Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Deng G (2013) Diagnostic identification of the impact of meteorological conditions on PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing. Atmos Environ 81:158–165Google Scholar
  33. Wegesser TC, Pinkerton KE, Last JA (2009) California wildfires of 2008: coarse and fine particulate matter toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 117(6):893–897Google Scholar
  34. Xie Y, Li X, Ngai EWT, Ying W (2009) Customer churn prediction using improved balanced random forests. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5445–5449Google Scholar
  35. Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, Sun Z (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Green 3(2):65–78Google Scholar
  36. Yang L, Wu Y, Davis JM, Hao J (2011) Estimating the effects of meteorology on PM2.5 reduction during the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing, China. Front Environ Sci Eng China 5(3):331–341Google Scholar
  37. Yeganeh B, Hewson MG, Clifford S, Knibbs LD, Morawska L (2017) A satellite-based model for estimating PM2.5 concentration in a sparsely populated environment using soft computing techniques. Environ Model Softw 88:84–92Google Scholar
  38. Yin Q, Wang JF, Hu MG, Wong HT (2016) Estimation of daily PM2.5 concentration and its relationship with meteorological conditions in Beijing. J Environ Sci 48:161–168Google Scholar
  39. Zhang C, Ni Z, Ni L (2015) Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis between PM2.5 and meteorological factors. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 438:114–123Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Zheng
    • 1
  • San Li
    • 1
  • Chuanshan Zou
    • 2
  • Xiaojian Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guocai Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.College of ScienceNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of ForestryNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations