Comparison of three processing methods for laminated bamboo timber production

  • Edi Suhaimi Bakar
  • Muhammad Nadzim Mohd Nazip
  • Rogerson Anokye
  • Lee Seng Hua
Original Paper
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Three processing techniques, split-squaring (SS), V-grooving (VG), and split-edging (SE), were evaluated and compared in terms of their processing time and recovery. Semantan bamboo (Gigantochloa scortechinii Gamble) was used as a raw material and the results showed that the VG-method required the longest processing time (32.1 min), followed by the SS-method (18.2 min), and the SE-method (17.9 min). However, the VG-method showed the highest recovery (82.0%) compared to the SS-method and SE-method, 31.0 and 49.4%, respectively. When both processing time and recovery factors were combined with the same weighing factor, the highest value was recorded with the VG-method (49.1), while the SE-method had values of 31.1 and the SS-method 12.8. The results suggest that the VG-method is the best option. However, the V-grooving machine is still a prototype and therefore the SE-method could be an alternative option until the improved V-grooving machine is available.

Keywords

Bamboo culm Laminated bamboo timber V-grooving method Split-squaring method Split-edging method 

References

  1. Bakar ES, Nugroho N, Zulfa U, Maniam T (2006) Conversion of bamboo culms into bamboo mat through V-grooving method. In: Proceedings of 8th pacific rim bio-based composites symposium, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakar ES, Zaidon A, Jusoh MZ, Dzafarin MS (2012) An apparatus to convert cylindrical shaped objects to flat sheet objects and a method thereof. Patent number: PI2012001327Google Scholar
  3. Correal J, Lopez L (2008) Mechanical properties of Colombian glued laminated bamboo. In: Paudel SK, Xiao Y, Inoue M (eds) Modern bamboo structures. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaur PJ, Kardam V, Pant KK, Naik SN, Satya S (2016) Characterization of commercially important Asian bamboo species. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 74:137–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Li H, Zhang Q, Huang D, Deeks AJ (2013) Compressive performance of laminated bamboo. Compos Part B Eng 54:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liese W (1992) The structure of bamboo in relation to its properties and utilization. In: Proceedings of international symposium on industrial use of bamboo, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu J, Zhang H, Chrusciel L, Na B, Lu X (2013) Study on a bamboo stressed flattening process. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 71:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mori M (1987) Process of flattening bamboo pieces utilizing microwave heating. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 33:630–636Google Scholar
  9. Parkkeeree T, Matan N, Kyokon B (2015) Mechanisms of bamboo flattening in hot linseed oil. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 73:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruiz Pérez MB, Belcher B, Achdiawan R et al (2004) Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecol Soc 9(2):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sulastininsih IM, Nurwati (2009) Physical and mechanical properties of laminated bamboo board. J Trop For Sci 21(3):246–251Google Scholar
  12. Zaidon A, Lee SH, Zahari MR (2016) Performance of compreg laminated bamboo/wood hybrid using phenolic-resin-treated strips as core layer. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 74:621–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang QS (1988) Studies of bamboo plywood I—The softening and flattening of bamboo. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 4:13–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edi Suhaimi Bakar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Muhammad Nadzim Mohd Nazip
    • 1
  • Rogerson Anokye
    • 1
  • Lee Seng Hua
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP)Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations