Advertisement

More Than “Spending Time with the Body”: The Role of a Family’s Grief in Determinations of Brain Death

  • Annie B. FriedrichEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

In many ways, grief is thought to be outside the realm of bioethics and clinical ethics, and grieving patients or family members may be passed off to grief counselors or therapists. Yet grief can play a particularly poignant role in the ethical encounter, especially in cases of brain death, where the line between life and death has been blurred. Although brain death is legally and medically recognized as death in the United States and elsewhere, the concept has been contentious since its inception in 1968. Yet in most cases, families are not allowed to reject the determination of brain death. Apart from religious exemptions, families have no recourse to reject this controversial determination of death. This paper explores the role of grief in brain death determinations and argues that bioethics has failed to address the complexity of grief in determinations of brain death. Grief ought to have epistemological weight in brain death determinations because of the contested nature of the diagnosis and the unique ways in which grief informs the situation. Thus, I argue that, in some rare cases, reasonable accommodation policies should be expanded to allow for refusals of brain death determinations based on the emotional and moral force of grief. By drawing on ethnographic accounts of grief in other cultures, I problematize the current procedural and linear understandings of grief in brain death determinations, and I conclude by offering a new way in which to understand the case of Jahi McMath.

Keywords

Grief Brain death Reasonable accommodation Anthropology Jahi McMath 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Harold Braswell for his insightful feedback on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. 1968. A definition of irreversible coma. The Journal of the American Medical Association 205(6): 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, C.K. 1955. Psychiatry for the family physician. New York: Blakiston-McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Boss, P. 1999. Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boss, P. 2010. The trauma and complicated grief of ambiguous loss. Pastoral Psychology 59: 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, A. 2001. The melancholy of race: Psychoanalysis, assimilation, and hidden grief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Doka, K. 2002. Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dolan, C. 2013. A personal story of representing Jahi McMath. The Examiner, December 25. http://archives.sfexaminer.com/sanfrancisco/a-personal-story-of-representing-jahi-mcmath/Content?oid=2658052. Accessed February 2, 2017.
  8. Dubler, N., and C. Liebman. 2011. Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions-Revised and expanded edition. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Emanuel, L. 1995. Reexamining death: The asymptotic model and a bounded zone definition. Hastings Center Report 25(4): 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelhardt, H.T. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Engle, P. 1994. Reviewed work(s): Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil by Nancy Scheper-Hughes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8(3): 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field, D., and S. Payne. 2003. Social aspects of bereavement. Cancer Nursing Practice 2(8): 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldschmidt, D. 2018. Jahi McMath, California teen at center of brain-death controversy, has died. CNN, June 29. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/29/health/jahi-mcmath-brain-dead-teen-death/index.html. Accessed October 18, 2018.
  14. Halevy, A. 2001. Beyond brain death? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26(5): 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halevy, A., and B. Brody. 1993. Brain death: Reconciling definitions, criteria, and tests. Annals of Internal Medicine 119(6): 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HHC Ethics Network. 2016. Brain death and reasonable accommodation. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. http://hhcethics.org/paragraphs.shtml. Accessed March 25, 2017.
  17. James, W. 2010. The will to believe. In The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy,13–45. The Floating Press.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, L. 2016. The case for reasonable accommodation of conscientious objections to declarations of brain death. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(1): 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klass, D., P.R. Silverman, and S.L. Nickman. 1996. Continuing bonds. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinman, A. 1999. Moral experience and ethical reflection: Can ethnography reconcile them? A quandary for “The New Bioethics”. Daedalus 128(4): 69–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kübler-Ross, E. 1969. On death and dying. London: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  22. Luce, J. 2015. The uncommon case of Jahi McMath. Chest 258(5): 2255–2262.Google Scholar
  23. Neurocritical Care Society. 2014. Brain Death Toolkit. https://www.pathlms.com/ncsondemand/courses/1223. Accessed March 23, 2017.
  24. New York State Department of Health and New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. 2011. Guidelines for determining brain death. http://www.health.ny.gov/professionals/ hospital_administrator/letters/2011/brain_death_guidelines. htm. Accessed March 23, 2017.
  25. Nussbaum, M. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, F., and R. Truog. 2009. The incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria: A commentary on Controversies in the determination of death, a white paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19(2): 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Onishi, N. 2014. A brain is dead, a heart beats on. The New York Times, January 4, A10.Google Scholar
  28. Payne, S., S. Horn, and M. Relf. 1999. Loss and bereavement. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Payne, S. 2007. Contemporary views of bereavement and the experience of grief. In Organ and tissue donation: An evidence base for practice, edited by S. Payne and M. Sque, 21–39. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  30. President’s commission for the study of ethical problems in medicine and biomedical and behavioral research. 1981. Defining death: Medical, legal and ethical issues in the determination of death. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. President’s Council on Bioethics. 2008. Controversies in the determination of death. Washington, DC. https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/death/. Accessed March 25, 2017.
  32. Rosaldo, R. 1980. Ilongot headhunting, 1883-1973: A study in society and history. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rosaldo, R. 2014. The day of Shelly’s death: The poetry and ethnography of grief. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheper-Hughes, N. 1992. Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Shah, S., and F. Miller. 2010. Can we handle the truth? Legal fictions in the determination of death. American Journal of Law & Medicine 36(4): 540–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shewmon, D. 2001. The brain and somatic integration: Insights into the standard biological rationale for equating “brain death” with death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26(5): 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stroebe, M., and H. Schut. 1999. The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies 23(3): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stroebe, M.S., H. Schut, and W. Stroebe. 2005. Grief work, disclosure and counseling: Do they help the bereaved? Clinical Psychology Review 25(4): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Szabo, L. 2014. Ethicists criticize treatment of brain-dead patients. National Catholic Reporter, January 10. https://www.ncronline.org/news/people/ethicists-criticize-treatment-brain-dead-patients. Accessed February 2, 2017.
  40. Truog, R. 2007. Brain death—too flawed to endure, too ingrained to abandon. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35(2): 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner, L. 2009. Bioethics and the social students of medicine: Overlapping concerns. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18(1): 36-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Uniform Determination of Death Act. 1980. Accessed April 1, 2017.Google Scholar
  43. Volpe, R., J.S. Crites, and K.L. Kirschner. 2015. Temporizing after spinal cord injury. Hastings Center Report (45)2: 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wortman, C.B., and R.C. Silver. 1989. The myths of coping with loss. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57(3): 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations