US Hospice Structure and its Implications for the “Right to Die” Debate
This article is an analysis of the relationship between US hospice structure and the feeling of being a burden to others (FBO). A goal of US hospice care is to reduce the FBO. But in America, hospice is limited in its ability to do so because of the high caregiver burden it places on family members of dying people. Through a historical study, I show that this burden was excessive when the hospice system was created and has worsened over time. Through three ethnographic vignettes, I demonstrate how this burden inculcates in dying people the FBO. I then examine the bioethical implications of this finding for the existing US debate about physician-assisted suicide (PAS). The presence of FBO due to insufficient hospice care supports arguments made by PAS opponents about the social pressure placed on dying people. This finding is not itself sufficient to resolve the “right to die” debate. But it provides the ground for a compromise, across the debate, to reduce the FBO by changing US hospice structure. The resulting consensus will further the goals of both PAS proponents and opponents.
KeywordsFeeling of being a burden to others Hospice and palliative care Disability studies Euthanasia Familial caregiving
- Abel, E.K. 2017. Living in death’s shadow: Family experiences of terminal care and irreplaceable loss. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Agich, G.J. 1993. Autonomy and long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Battin, M.P., A. Van der Heide, L. Ganzini, G. Van der Wal, and B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen. 2007. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: Evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(10): 591–597.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Coombs Lee, B. 2016. Compassion and choices. Pres. Barbara Coombs Lee’s Statement on the Canada Euthanasia Bill, April 28. https://compassionandchoices.org/news/compassion-choices-pres-barbara-coombs-lees-statement-canada-euthanasia-bill. Accessed 12 September 2018.
- The Connecticut Hospice Newsletter. 1982. Administrator testifies on hospice legislation. Winter/Spring 1982, 2, Box 1, Folder 4, Edward F. Dobihal Papers, Yale University, Sterling Memorial Library.Google Scholar
- Dobihal, E.F. 1975. To honor all life: The case for support of Hospice Inc. Box 3, Folder 23, Florence and Henry Wald Papers, Yale University, Sterling Memorial Library.Google Scholar
- Du Boulay, S. 1984. Cicely Saunders: Founder of the modern hospice movement. London: SPCK Publishing.Google Scholar
- Duménil, G. and D. Lévy. 2011. The crisis of neoliberalism. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Estes, C.L. 1997. Privatization, the welfare state, and aging: The Reagan-Bush legacy. In The nation’s health, 5th ed, edited by. P. Lee and C. Estes, 199–210. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fineman, M. 2004. The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
- Fleming, D.A. 2010. The burden of caregiving at the end of life. In Care of the dying patient, edited by. D.A. Fleming and J.C. Hagan III, 58–67. Colombia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
- Gill, C. 1998. The false autonomy of forced choice: Rationalizing suicide for persons with disabilities. In Contemporary perspectives on rational suicide, edited by J. Werth, 171–180. Philadelphia: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gill, C. 2004. Depression in the context of disability and the “right to die.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25(3): 171–198.Google Scholar
- Greer, D.S. and V. Mor. 1985. How Medicare is altering the hospice movement. Hastings Center Report 15(5): 6.Google Scholar
- Hardwig, J. 2014. Dying at the right time: Reflections on (un)assisted suicide. In Ethics in Action, edited by H. LaFollette, 101–111. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. 2007. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hospice Inc. 1972. Guidelines for patient selection: Home care program. Box 9, Folder 113, Florence and Henry Wald Papers, Yale University, Sterling Memorial Library.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2014. Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. September 17. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2014/Dying-In-America-Improving-Quality-and-Honoring-Individual-Preferences-Near-the-End-of-Life.aspx. Accessed May 1, 2017.
- McPherson, C., K. Wilson, L. Chyurlia, et al. 2010. The balance of give and take in caregiver–partner relationships: An examination of self-perceived burden, relationship equity, and quality of life from the perspective of care recipients following stroke. Rehabilitation Psychology 55(2): 194–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medicare regulations for hospice care, including the conditions of participation for hospice care. 42 CFR 418, Current as of November 2, 2010. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/part-418. Accessed September 11, 2018.
- MedPAC 2018. Report to Congress: Reforming the Delivery System, Evaluating Medicare’s Hospice Benefit.Google Scholar
- MedPAC 2010. Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy, Hospice.Google Scholar
- Mirowski, P. 2013. Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
- Mor, V. and S. Masterson-Allen. 1987. Hospice care systems: Structure, process, costs, and outcome. New York: Springer Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO). 2012. NHPCO facts and figures: Hospice care in America. Newsline, March. https://www.nhpco.org/sites/default/files/public/newsline/2012/NL_March_12.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2018.
- Oregon Public Health Division (OPHD). 2014. Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act--2014. https://public.health.oregon.gov/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Documents/year17.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2018.
- Span, P. 2014. Differences in care at for-profit hospices. New York Times, March 3. http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/03/differences-in-care-at-for-profit-hospices/?_r=0. Accessed September 11, 2018.
- Wald, F. 1968. Untitled (protocol for nurse’s study of the dying patient). Box 20, Folder 21, Florence and Henry Wald Papers, Yale University, Sterling Memorial Library.Google Scholar
- Wiener, J., W. Anderson, G. Khatutsky, et al. 2013. Medicaid spend down: New estimates and implications for long--term services and supports financing reform. The SCAN Foundation Final Report, March. http://www.thescanfoundation.org/sites/thescanfoundation.org/files/rti_medicaid-spend-down_3-20-13_1.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2018.