Advertisement

Towards an Ecology of Dementia: A Manifesto

  • Michael ChapmanEmail author
  • Jennifer Philip
  • Paul Komesaroff
Symposium: Dementia

Abstract

Dementia is more than a disease. What dementia is, how it is understood, and how it is experienced is influenced by multiple factors including our societal preoccupation with individual identity. This essay introduces empirical and theoretical evidence of alternative ways of understanding dementia that act as a challenge to common assumptions. It proposes that dementia be understood as an experience of systems, particularly networks of people affected by the diagnosis. Taking this step reveals much about the dementia experience, and about what can be learned from persons with dementia and their networks of family, friends, and carers. It also suggests that dementia may be best thought of as an ecology that arises from the interaction between neuropathological change, people, language, and meaning. While challenging, this perspective may provide new ways of responding to dementia and caring for those affected by it.

Keywords

Dementia Alzheimer’s disease Ethics Bioethics Systems theory Family therapy 

Notes

References

  1. Adams, T., and P. Gardiner. 2005. Communication and interaction within dementia care triads: Developing a theory for relationship-centred care. Dementia 4(2): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agich, G.J. 2003. Dependence and autonomy in old age an ethical framework for long-term care, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baikie, E. 2002. The impact of dementia on marital relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy 17(3): 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett, R. 2014. Citizenship in action: The lived experiences of citizens with dementia who campaign for social change. Disability & Society 29(8): 1291–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, R., T. Gjernes, A.T. Lotherington, and A. Obstefelder. 2018. Gender, citizenship and dementia care: A scoping review of studies to inform policy and future research. Health and Social Care in the Community 26(1): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartlett, R., and D. O’Connor. 2007a. From personhood to citizenship: Broadening the lens for dementia practice and research. Journal Of Aging Studies 21(2): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2007b. From personhood to citizenship: Broadening the lens for dementia practice and research. Journal of Aging Studies 21(2): 107–118.Google Scholar
  8. Behuniak, S.M. 2010. Toward a political model of dementia: Power as compassionate care. Journal of Aging Studies 24(4): 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodaty, H., B. Draper, and L-F Low. 2003. Nursing home staff attitudes towards residents with dementia: Strain and satisfaction with work. Journal of Advanced Nursing 44(6): 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clare, L. 2003. Managing threats to self: Awareness in early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Social Science & Medicine 57(6): 1017–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. 1998. Spinoza: Practical philosophy. City Lights Books.Google Scholar
  12. Fontaine, J.L.A., and J.A.N.R Oyebode. 2014. Family relationships and dementia : A synthesis of qualitative research including the person with dementia. Ageing & Society 34(7): 1243–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser, J.S., and A. Solovey 2007. Second order change in psychotherapy: The golden thread that unites effective treatments. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. George, D.R. 2010. Overcoming the social death of dementia through language. The Lancet 376(9741): 586–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. 2000. Actions, speech acts, linguistically mediated interactions, and the lifeworld, In On the pragmatics of communication, edited by Maeve Cook, 215–255. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hellstrom, I., M. Nolan, and U. Lundh. 2007. Sustaining “couplehood”: Spouses’ strategies for living positively with dementia. Dementia 6(3): 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hydén, L.C., and L. Örulv. 2009. Narrative and identity in Alzheimer’s disease: A case study. Journal of Aging Studies 23(4): 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karner, T.X., and D. Bobbitt-Zeher. 2005. Losing selves: Dementia care as disruption and transformation. Symbolic Interaction 28(4): 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinsella, E.A. 2006. Hermeneutics and critical hermeneutics: Exploring possibilities within the art of interpretation. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(3).  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.3.145.
  20. Kittay, E.F. 2008. At the margins of moral personhood. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5(2–3): 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2011. The ethics of care, dependence, and disability*. Ratio. Juris 24(1): 49–58.Google Scholar
  22. Kitwood, T.M. 1997. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Laverty, S.M. 2003. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomoenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2(3): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leibing, A. 2008. Entangled matters—Alzheimer’s, interiority, and the “ Unflattening” of the World. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 32(2): 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levinas, E. 1981. Otherwise Than Being Or Beyond Essence. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  26. Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maturana, H.R. 1975. The organization of the living : A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7(3):149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nolan, M., G. Grant, and J. Keady. 1996. Understanding family care: A multidimensional model of caring and coping. Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2009. Dementia: Ethical issues. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Dementia-report-Oct-09.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2019.
  30. Nussbaum, M.C. 2004. Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. O’Shaughnessy, M., K. Lee, and T. Lintern. 2010. Changes in the couple relationship in dementia care: Spouse carers’ experiences. Dementia 9(2): 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker, D. 2011. Residential aged care facilities places for living and dying. Cultural Studies Review 17(1): 31–51.Google Scholar
  33. Parmenidou, A.V. 2011. Second-order change in psychotherapy : A necessary requirement? Remaining sane in insane places. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference of A.P.P.A.C., Athens, Greece, May 17–21.Google Scholar
  34. Post, S.G. 2006. Respectare: Moral respect for the lives of the deeply forgetful. In Dementia: Mind, meaning and person, edited by J.C Hughes, S.J. Louw, and S.R Sabat, 223–235. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Purves, B.A. 2011. Exploring positioning in Alzheimer disease through analyses of family talk. Dementia 10(1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rohrbaugh, M.J. 2014. Old wine in new bottles: Decanting systemic family process research in the era of evidence-based practice. Family Process 53(3): 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sabat, S.R., and R. Harré. 1992. The construction and deconstruction of self in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing and Society 12(4): 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanders, S., and J. Power. 2009. Roles, responsibilities, and relationships among older husbands caring for wives with progressive dementia and other chronic conditions. Health & Social Work 34(1): 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shields, C., L. Wynne, S. McDaniel, and B. Gawinski. 1994. The marginalization of family therapy: A historical and continuing problem. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 20(2): 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spalding, N.J., and T. Phillips. 2007. Exploring the use of vignettes: From validity to trustworthiness. Qualitative Health Research 17(7): 954–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spinoza, B. de. 2001. Ethics. Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
  42. Sprenkle, D.H., S.D. Davis, and J.L. Lebow. 2009. Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sweeting, H., and M. Gilhooly. 1997. Dementia and the phenomenon of social death. Sociology Of Health & Illness 19(1): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Westius, A., K. Kallenberg, and A. Norberg. 2010. Views of life and sense of identity in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing and Society 30(7): 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitlatch, C.J., K. Judge, S.H. Zarit, and E. Femia. 2006. Dyadic intervention for family caregivers and care receivers in early-stage dementia. The Gerontologist 46(5): 688–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeilig, H. 2014. Dementia as a cultural metaphor. The Gerontologist 54(2): 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical School, College of Health and MedicineAustralian National UniversityGarranAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Palliative CareCanberra Regional Cancer CentreGarranAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health SciencesUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  4. 4.St Vincent’s Hospital Department of Palliative CareFitzroyAustralia
  5. 5.Victorian Comprehensive Cancer CentreParkvilleAustralia
  6. 6.Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations