Advertisement

The Right to Accessible and Acceptable Healthcare Services. Negotiating Rules and Solutions With Members of Ethnocultural Minorities

  • Fabio MacioceEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

The right to health implies, among other things, that individuals and communities must be allowed to have a voice in decisions concerning the definition of their well-being. The article argues for a more active participation of ethnocultural minorities in healthcare decisions and highlights the relevance of strategies aimed at creating a bottom-up engagement of people and groups, as well as of measures aimed at a broader organizational flexibility, in order to meet migrants’ and minorities’ needs. Finally, the article clarifies that these strategies are not simply the outcome of a welcoming attitude of the Western healthcare system but may be interpreted as a specific duty resulting from the notion of “particularly vulnerable groups,” as formulated by the ECtHR in its case law: when vulnerable groups are at stake, every decision about state actions and rules regarding healthcare should start from an a consideration of the specific conditions and needs of people belonging to vulnerable minority groups.

Keywords

Right to health Minorities Ethnocultural groups Vulnerable groups ECtHR Asymmetrical balance 

Notes

References

  1. Basu, A., and M. Dutta. 2007. Centralizing context and culture in the co-construction of health: Localizing and vocalizing health meanings in rural India. Health Communication 21(2): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhopal, R.S. 2014. Migration, ethnicity, race, and health in multicultural societies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bishoff, A. 2006. Caring for migrants and minority patients in European hospitals. A review of effective interventions. SFM Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Blackhall, L.J., S. Murphy, G. Frank, V. Michel, and S. Azen. 1995. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. Journal of American Medical Association 274(10): 820–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonder, B., and L. Martin. 2013. Culture in clinical care: Strategies for competence. Slack Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen Matthew, D. 2008. Race, religion and informed consent: Lessons from social science. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 36(1): 150–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brubaker, R. 2002. Ethnicity without groups. Archive Europenne de Sociologie 63(2): 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campani, G. 2005. Minorities formation in Italy. In Institutional pre-requisites for cultural minorities in nation states, edited by J. Blaschke, 143–300. Berlin: Parabolis.Google Scholar
  9. Capotorti, F. 1977. The international protection of persons belonging to ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities since 1919. United Nations Economic and Social Council.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1979. Study of the rights of the persons belonging to ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities. New York: United Nations, E/CN.4/Sub.2/384/Rev.1.Google Scholar
  11. CESCR. 2000. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations: 2000. UN Document E/C.12/20e00/4. http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(symbol)/E.C.12.2000.4.En?OpenDocument. Accessed August 15, 2018.
  12. Charles, C., and S. De Maio. 1993. Lay participation in health care decision making: A conceptual framework. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 18(4): 881–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cioffi, R.N. 2003. Communicating with culturally and linguistically diverse patients in an acute care setting: Nurses’ experiences. International Journal of Nursing Studies 40(3): 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson, E., and J.J. Liu, and A. Sheikh. 2010. The impact of ethnicity on asthma care. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 19(3): 202–208.Google Scholar
  15. Degrie, L., C. Gastmans, L. Mahieu, B. Dierckx de Casterlé, and Y. Denier. 2017. How do ethnic minority patients experience the intercultural care encounter in hospitals? A systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Medical Ethics 18(1): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donders, Y.M. 2015. Exploring the cultural dimensions of the right to the highest attainable standard of health. PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 18(2): 180–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutta, M. 2008. Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eisenberg, A. 2009. Reasons of identity: A normative guide to the political and legal assessment of identity claims. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, A., and J. Spinner-Halev. 2005. Introduction. In Minorities within minorities: Equality, rights and diversity, edited by A. Eisenberg and J. Spinner-Halev, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2009. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—Solidarity in health: Reducing health inequalities in the EU. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0567. Accessed January 14, 2019.
  21. Faden, R.R. and T.L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fernando, S. 2003. Cultural diversity, mental health and psychiatry. The struggle against racism. Hove, England: Brunner-Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fineman, M.A. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 20(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  24. Florin, D., and J. Dixon. 2004. Public involvement in health ethics. British Medical Journal 328(7432): 159–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gillon, R. 2003. Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be first among equals. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(5): 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green, G., H. Bradby, A. Chan, and M. Lee. 2006. We are not completely Westernised: Dual medical systems and pathways to health care among Chinese migrant women in England. Social Science & Medicine 62(6): 1498–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Green, L. 1994. Internal minorities and their rights. In Group rights, edited by J. Baker, 257–272. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. Griffiths, C., S. Ahmed, S. Ahmed, et al. 2000. Using health-related quality of life measures in minority ethnic groups: An approach to translating measures into Bengali (Sylheti). European Journal of General Practice 6(4): 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson-Preece, J. 1998. National minorities and the European nation-states system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 2014. Beyond the (non) definition of minority. European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Brief # 30. http://www.ecmi.de/uploads/tx_lfpubdb/Brief_30.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2019.
  31. Knifton, L. 2012. Understanding and addressing the stigma of mental illness with ethnic minority communities. Health Sociology Review 21(3): 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lai, D., and N. Chappell. 2007. Use of Traditional Chinese Medicine by older Chinese immigrants in Canada. Family Practice 24(1): 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawn, J., J. Rohde, S. Rifkin, et al. 2008. Alma-Ata 30 years on: Revolutionary, relevant, and time to revitalise. Lancet 372(9642): 917–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long, J., P. Byrne, M. Gabbay, L. Firth, and I. Fletcher. 2015. The dragon and the snake: Health practices among Chinese in the UK from an inter-disciplinary perspective. Ethnicity and Health 20(2): 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorant, V., and R. Bhopal. 2010. Comparing policies to tackle ethnic inequalities in health: Belgium 1 Scotland 4. The European Journal of Public Health 21(2): 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macioce, F. 2017). Undocumented migrants, vulnerability and strategies of inclusion. A philosophical perspective. Constellations 25(1): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maclean, A. 2009. Autonomy, informed consent and medical law: A relational challenge, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malloy, T.H. 2014. National minorities between protection and empowerment: Towards a theory of empowerment. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 13(2): 11–29.Google Scholar
  39. Marshall, P., and B. Koenig. 2004. Accounting for culture in a globalized bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32(2): 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meeuwesen, L., and J.A. Harmsen, R.M. Bernsen, and M.A. Bruijnzeels. 2006. Do Dutch doctors communicate differently with immigrant patients than with Dutch patients? Social Science and Medicine 63(9): 2407–2417.Google Scholar
  41. Mladovsky, P. 2007. Migrant health in the EU. Eurohealth 13(9): 9–11.Google Scholar
  42. Montesi, L., M.T. Caletti, and G. Marchesini. 2016. Diabetes in migrants and ethnic minorities in a changing World. World Journal of Diabetes 7(3): 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naish, J., J. Brown, and B. Denton. 1994. Intercultural consultations: Investigation of factors that deter non- English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening. British Medical Journal 309(6962): 1126–1128.Google Scholar
  44. Neveloff, D.N., and C.B. Liebman. 2011. Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions. Nashville: Vanderblit University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Osipov, A. 2013. Non-territorial autonomy as a way to frame diversity policies: The case of Russia. In The challenge of non-territorial autonomy. Theory and practice, edited by E. Nimmi, A. Osipov, and D. Smith, 135–139. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  46. Peroni, L., and A. Timmer. 2013. Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11(4): 1056–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pieroni, A., and C.L. Quave. 2005. Traditional pharmacopoeias and medicines among Albanians and Italians in southern Italy: A comparison. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 101(1): 258–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Priebe, S., S. Sandhu, S. Dias, et al. 2011. Good practice in health care for migrants: Views and experiences of care professionals in 16 European countries. BMC Public Health 11(1): 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rechel, B., P. Mladovsky, D. Ingleby, J.P. Mackenbach, and M. McKee. 2013. Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe. Lancet 381(9873): 1235–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rochelle, T.N., and D. Marks. 2011. Health behaviors and use of Traditional Chinese Medicine among the British Chinese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42(3): 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sadan, E. 2004. Empowerment and community planning: Theory and practice of people-focused social solutions. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Salomonsen, L.J., L. Skovgaard, S. la Cour, L. Nyborg, L. Launsø, and V. Fønnebo. 2011. Use of complementary and alternative medicine at Norwegian and Danish hospitals. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 11(1): 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schouten B.C., and L. Meeuwesen. 2006. Cultural differences in medical communication: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 64(1–3): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Secretary of State for Health (ed). 2008. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. The Stationery Office, CM7432.Google Scholar
  55. Shachar, A. 2001. Multicultural jurisdictions. Cultural differences and women’s rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. 2012. Demystifying culture. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2): 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sproston, K., L. Pitson, G. Whitfield, and E. Walker. 2000. Health and lifestyles of the Chinese population in England. London, U.K.: Health Education Authority.Google Scholar
  58. Torbisco Casals, N. 2016. Multiculturalism, identity claims, and human rights: From politics to courts. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights 10(2): 367–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Viruell-Fuentes, E.A. 2007. Beyond acculturation: Immigration, discrimination, and health research among Mexicans in the United States. Social Science and Medicine 65(7): 1524–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weber, B., and B. Reilly. 1997. Enhancing mammography in the inner city: A randomised trial of intensive case management. Archives of Internal Medicine 157(20): 2345–2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williamson, L. 2014. Patient and citizen participation in health: The need for improved ethical support. The American Journal of Bioethics 14(6): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woolley, S. 2005. Children of Jehovah’s witnesses and adolescent Jehovah’s witnesses: What are their rights? Archives of Disease in Childhood 90(7): 715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yamin, A.E. 2005. The right to health under international law and its relevance to the United States. American Journal of Public Health 95(7): 1156–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yehya, N.A., and M.J. Dutta. 2010. Health, religion, and meaning: A culture-centered study of Druze women. Qualitative Health Research 20(6): 845–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lumsa UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations