Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 569–578 | Cite as

Intersex Activists in Israel: Their Achievements and the Obstacles They Face

  • Limor Meoded DanonEmail author
Original Research


This article focuses on the dynamic between the medical policy on intersex bodies and intersex activists in Israel. Recently, in many countries changes have taken place in medical guidelines regarding intersex patients and laws that regulate medical practices and prohibit irreversible surgeries for intersex babies for cosmetic reasons and without the patient’s consent. In Israel, intersex activists are limited by several factors. On the one hand, they are influenced by the achievements of intersex activism around the world but on the other, the pathologizing medical discourse and socio-medical practices, which include early diagnosis, early irreversible surgeries, and secrecy surrounding intersexed bodies, present obstacles to achieving bodily autonomy for intersex individuals and social recognition of different sex development. Nevertheless, intersex activists are attempting to find different social and media spaces in which to achieve public acknowledgement and future bodily autonomy for intersexed people and seeking medical professionals’ cooperation. Recently, the Israeli Ministry of Health published a new circular for intersex/DSD patients, and while it does not clearly forbid irreversible surgeries, it provides information about the complexities of intersex people and their experience.


Intersex bodies Intersex activists Bodily autonomy Socio-medical practices Israel 


  1. Altarescu, G., O. Barenholz, and P. Renbaum. 2011. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)—Prevention of the birth of children affected with endocrine diseases. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism 24(7/8): 543–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chase, C. 1998. Hermaphrodites with attitude: Mapping the emergence of intersex political activism. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbians and Gay Studies 4(2): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ––––. 2003. What is the agenda of the intersex patient advocacy movement? The Endocrinologist 13(3): 240–242.Google Scholar
  4. Cools, M., A. Nordenström, R. Robeva, et al. 2018. Caring for individuals with a difference of sex development (DSD): A Consensus Statement. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 14: 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. 2015. Human rights and intersex people. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Accessed July 30, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Creighton, S.M. 2001. Surgery for intersex. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 94(5): 218–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ––––. 2004. Long-term outcome of feminization surgery: The London experience. British Journal of Urology International 93(3): 44–46.Google Scholar
  8. Crouch, N.S., L.M. Liao, C.R. Woodhouse, G.S. Conway, and S.M. Creighton. 2008. Sexual function and genital sensitivity following feminizing genitoplasty for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The Journal of Urology 179(2): 634–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, G. 2015. Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dreger, A.D. 1998. Hermaphrodites and the medical invention of sex. Cambridge, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dreger, A.D. (ed). 1999. Intersex in the age of ethics. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  12. Dreger, A.D., and A.M. Herndon. 2009. Progress and politics in the intersex rights movement: Feminist theory in action. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbians and Gay Studies 15(2): 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elders, M.J., D. Satcher, and R. Carmona. 2017. Re-thinking genital surgeries on intersex infants. Palm Center Blueprints for Sound Public Policy. Accessed July 30, 2017.
  14. Farkas, A., K. Dimitry, and B. Chertin. 2004. Masculinizing genitoplasty in male pseudohermaphroditism. Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews 2(1): 15–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Feder, E.K. 2014. Making sense of intersex: Changing ethical perspectives in bio-medicine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. 1973. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  17. ––––. 1990. The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  18. ––––. 1995. Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  19. Guilbert, K. 2018. Portugal approves law to boost transgender rights, protect intersex infants. Reuters, April 14. Accessed July 27, 2018.
  20. Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. 2007. A life (un)worthy of living: Reproductive genetics in Israel and Germany. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. and S. Shkedi. 2007. On new reproductive technologies and family ethics: Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for sibling donor in Israel and Germany. Social Science and Medicine 65(10): 2081–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmes, M. 2008a. Intersex: A perilous difference. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ––––. 2008b. Mind the gaps: Intersex and (re-productive) spaces in disability studies and bioethics. Bioethical Inquiry 5(2/3): 169–181.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, M., ed. 2009. Critical intersex. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Karkazis, K. 2008. Fixing sex, intersex, medical authority and lived experience. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasher, R. 2017. Second thoughts on circumcision. Herzliya: Niv Books (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  27. Kessler, S.J. 1998. Lessons from the intersexed. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Krege, S., K.H. Walz, B.P. Hauffa, I.K. Örner, and H. Rubben. 2000. Long-term follow-up of female patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia from 21-hydroxylase deficiency, with special emphasis on the results of vaginoplasty. British Journal of Urology International 86(3): 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, P.A., P.H. Christopher, S.A. Faisal, and A.H. Leuan. 2006. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics 118(2): 488–500.Google Scholar
  30. Liao, L.M. 2006. Psychology and clinical management of vaginal hypoplasia. In Ethics and intersex, edited by S.E. Sytsma, 225–240. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Meoded Danon, L. 2014. What kind of body? The effects of the MinGuf process on intersex peoples’ lives. Tel Aviv: Resling (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  32. ––––. 2015. The body/secret dynamic: Life experiences of intersexed people in Israel. Sage Open 5(2): 1–13.Google Scholar
  33. Meoded Danon, L., and N. Yanay. 2016. Intersexuality: On secret bodies and secrecy. Studies in Gender and Sexuality 17(1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meoded Danon, L., and A. Krämer. 2017. Between concealing and revealing intersexed bodies: Parental strategies. Qualitative Health Research 27(10): 1562–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministry of Health, Israel. 2017. Open image in new window Open image in new window [Diagnosis and treatment of a person withDSD/intersex (official circular on procedure] March 6, 2017.Google Scholar
  36. Minto, C.L., L.M. Liao, C.R. Woodhouse, P.G., Ransley, and S.M. Creighton. 2003. The effect of clitoral surgery on sexual outcome in individuals who have intersex conditions with ambiguous genitalia: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet 361(9365): 1252–1257.Google Scholar
  37. Morland, I. 2001. Management of intersex. The Lancet 358(9298): 2085–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ––––. 2009. What can queer theory do for intersex? GLQ: : A Journal of Lesbians and Gay Studies 15(2): 285–312.Google Scholar
  39. OII Intersex Network. 2018. Welcome [webpage]. Accessed July 27, 2018.
  40. Preves, S.E. 2003. Intersex and identity: The contested self. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Remennick, L. 2006. The quest for the perfect baby: Why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing? Sociology of Health and Illness 28(1): 21–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schober, J.M. 2004. Feminizing genitoplasty: A synopsis of issues relating to genital surgery in intersex individuals. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism 17(5): 697–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shalev, C., and S. Gooldin. 2006. The uses and misuses of in vitro fertilization in Israel: Some sociological and ethical considerations. Nashim: A Journal of Women’s Studies and Gender Issues 12(1): 151–176.Google Scholar
  44. Sircili, M.H. P., F.A. e Silva, E.M. Costa, et al. 2010. Long-term surgical outcome of masculinizing genitoplasty in large cohort of patients with disorders of sex development. The Journal of Urology 184(3): 1122–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spurgas, A. 2009. )Un)Queering identity: The biosocial production of Intersex/DSD. In Critical Intersex, edited by M. Holmes, 97–122. Surrey, Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Sytsma, S.E., ed. 2006. Ethics and intersex. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Sudai, M. 2017. Changing ethical and legal norms in the management of differences of sex development. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 5(10): 764–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warne, G., S. Grover, J. Hutson, et al. 2005. A long-term outcome study of intersex conditions. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism 18(6): 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Martin Buber Society of Fellows in the Humanities and Social SciencesThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations