Effects of Marker Size and Distribution on the Development of Kirkendall Voids, and Coefficients of Interdiffusion and Intrinsic Diffusion
- 19 Downloads
Development of Kirkendall voids, and determination of interdiffusion coefficients, marker plane movement and intrinsic diffusion coefficients were investigated as functions of marker size and distribution using Cu versus Ni solid-to-solid diffusion couples, annealed at 1000 °C for 48 h. The Al2O3 marker particles, varying in size, 1, 3, 5 and 9 μm, were dispersed in absolute ethanol, with concentration ranging from 0.67 to 33.33 mg/mL. To place the markers in diffusion couple, Ni was immersed in the Al2O3 dispersed ethanol, and removed to quickly dry under a lamp, leaving only the Al2O3 particle makers on the Ni surface. Optical microscopy was employed to document the distribution of Al2O3 particle markers on the Ni surface prior to the diffusion couple assembly. Field emission scanning electron microscopy equipped with x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy was employed to examine the development of Kirkdendall voids and to determine the concentration profiles. The concentration profiles were analyzed to determine the interdiffusion and intrinsic diffusion coefficients via Boltzmann–Matano and Heumann methods, respectively. As the marker concentration (or cross-sectional area coverage) increased, the Kirkendall voids became more elongated and interconnected, leading to a gap within the interdiffusion zone. Better consistency in the magnitude and composition-dependence of interdiffusion and intrinsic diffusion coefficients were observed with smaller, 1- and 3-μm Al2O3 marker particles in general. For 5- and 9-μm Al2O3 marker particles, only the concentration of 0.67 mg/mL, corresponding to no more than 11% of cross-sectional area coverage was acceptable to yield consistent interdiffusion and intrinsic diffusion coefficients.
Keywordsdiffusion coefficients Kirkendall effect marker shift
- 1.A.D. Smigelkas and E.O. Kirkendall, Zinc Diffusion in Alpha Brass, Trans. AIME, 1947, 171, p 130–142Google Scholar
- 2.H. Mehrer, Diffusion in Solids: Fundamentals, Methods, Materials, Diffusion-Controlled Processes. Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol 155, Springer, Berlin, 2007, p 212Google Scholar
- 11.T. Heumann and K. Grundhoff, Diffusion and Kirkendall Effect in the Cu-Ni System, Z. Metallkunde, 1972, 63(4), p 173–180Google Scholar
- 14.L. Wojnar, Image Analysis: Applications in Materials Engineering. CRC Series in Materials Science and Technology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1999, p c1999Google Scholar