Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1181–1186 | Cite as

Effects of the Number of Fatigue Cycles on the Hoop Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber/Epoxy Composite Pipes

  • Memduh Kara
  • Muhammed Kirici
  • Suleyman Cinar CaganEmail author
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


Glass fiber-reinforced plastics (GFRPs) composite materials are widely used in many areas due to their superior properties such as high strength, corrosion resistance against many chemicals, duplicate production, the possibility of production in very large dimensions, and lighter weight than metals and alloys. As the use of GFRP pipes increases, many test methods are performed to determine their mechanical properties. Hoop tensile strength of GFRP pipes was determined by hoop tensile strength test according to ASTM D 2290 standard, and fatigue tests of GFRP pipes were carried out by applying internal hydraulic pressure according to ASTM D 2992 standard. In this study, six-layered E-glass epoxy composite pipes which were manufactured by the filament wound method for winding angle ± 55° were subjected to fatigue tests at the different number of cycles, and hoop tensile strength of fatigued pipes was determined. The samples were subjected to a fatigue test at a stress ratio of 0.05 and a frequency of 0.42 Hz according to ASTM D 2992 standard. Fatigue tests were performed on samples with a stress value of 35% static burst pressure. As a result of experiments, the effects of the number of fatigue cycles on the hoop tensile strength of the GFRP pipes were investigated, and the damage occurred in the GFRP pipes was evaluated. The increase in the number of cycles from the fatigue tests applied to the samples resulted in a reduction in the tensile strength of the samples.


GFRP Composite pipe Fatigue Hoop tensile strength test 



This study was carried out as a Master of Science thesis by Muhammed KIRICI in the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science at University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey.


  1. 1.
    A. Hawa, M.S.A. Majid, M. Afendi, H.F.A. Marzuki, N.A.M. Amin, F. Mat, A.G. Gibson, Burst strength and impact behaviour of hydrothermally aged glass fibre/epoxy composite pipes. Mater. Des. 89, 455–464 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Demir, O. Sayman, A. Dogan, V. Arikan, Y. Arman, The effects of repeated transverse impact load on the burst pressure of composite pressure vessel. Compos. Part B Eng. 68, 121–125 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.E. Deniz, O. Ozdemir, M. Ozen, R. Karakuzu, Failure pressure and impact response of glass-epoxy pipes exposed to seawater. Compos. Part B Eng. 53, 355–361 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Tarfaoui, P.B. Gning, P. Davies, F. Collombet, Scale and size effects on dynamic response and damage of glass/epoxy tubular structures. J. Compos. Mater. 41(5), 547–558 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Gemi, N. Tarakcioglu, A. Akdemir, O.S. Sahin, Progressive fatigue failure behavior of glass/epoxy (± 75)(2) filament-wound pipes under pure internal pressure. Mater. Des. 30(10), 4293–4298 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Avci, O.S. Sahin, N. Tarakcioglu, Fatigue behavior of surface cracked filament wound pipes with high tangential strength in corrosive environment. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38(4), 1192–1199 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Uyaner, M. Kara, A. Sahin, Fatigue behavior of filament wound E-glass/epoxy composite tubes damaged by low velocity impact. Compos. Part B Eng. 61, 358–364 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Sari, R. Karakuzu, M.E. Deniz, B.M. Icten, Residual failure pressures and fatigue life of filament-wound composite pipes subjected to lateral impact. J. Compos. Mater. 46(15), 1787–1794 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Arikan, Failure analysis of (± 55°) (3) filament wound composite pipes with an inclined surface crack under static internal pressure. Compos. Struct. 92(1), 182–187 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Harris, in A Historical Review of the Fatigue Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Plastics. Fatigue in Composites, ed. by B. Harris (Woodhead Publishing Ltd and CRC Press LLC, 2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.M. Shokrieh, L.B. Lessard, Fatigue under multiaxial stress systems, in Fatigue in Composites, ed. by B. Harris (Woodhead Publishing Ltd and CRC Press LLC, 2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Samancı, Fatigue behavior of filament wound GFRP pipe with surface crack under internal pressure, Selcuk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, Konya (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Kara, M. Kırıcı, Effects of the number of fatigue cycles on the impact behavior of glass fiber/epoxy composite tubes. Compos. B Eng. 123, 55–63 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM-D2992-12, Standard practice for obtaining hydrostatic or pressure design basis for “fiberglass” (glass–fiber–reinforced thermosetting-resin) pipe and fittings, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2012),,
  15. 15.
    ASTM-D2290-12, Standard test method for apparent hoop tensile strength of plastic or reinforced plastic pipe, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2012),,
  16. 16.
    ASTM D1599-14e1. Standard test method for resistance to short-time hydraulic pressure of plastic pipe, tubing, and fittings. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International (2014),

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering FacultyMersin UniversityYenisehir, MersinTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringSelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations