Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 665–672 | Cite as

Appropriate Simulation Technique for Complete Single-Bolt Shear Connection Shear-Out Tensile Properties and Fracture Behavior Predictions

  • K. K. AdewoleEmail author
  • W. O. Ajagbe
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the finite element (FE) predictions of the complete S235, S690, Q550D, Q690D and Q890D steel grades steel sheet single-bolt shear connections shear-out (SBSCSO) behavior (tensile properties and fracture behavior). This work reveals that the FE elastic–plastic simulations without the damage and fracture model generally employed in the literature for SBSCSO failure predictions cannot predict the post-ultimate-load damage behavior, fracture initiation by elements removal and sudden drops in load required for determining the SBSCSO displacement at fracture. Consequently, the FE simulation without the damage and fracture model cannot accurately predict the complete SBSCSO tensile properties and fracture behavior. In particular, the FE simulation without the damage and fracture model cannot predict the SBSCSO displacement at fracture required for the seismic and fracture-resistant designs needed for the prevention of the failure of single-bolt shear connections that exhibit the shear-out fracture under extreme loading. FE simulation with the elastic, plastic damage and fracture models represents the appropriate simulation technique for the complete SBSCSO tensile properties and fracture behavior predictions.

Keywords

Finite element Single-bolt shear connection Shear-out capacity Shear-out displacement at fracture Steel sheet 

Notes

Supplementary material

11668_2019_645_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (407 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 407 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    A.M. Kanvinde, G.G. Deierlein, Finite-element simulation of ductile fracture in reduced section pull-plates using micromechanics-based fracture models. J. Struct. Eng. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2007)133:5(656) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Liao, W. Wang, Y. Chen, Ductile fracture prediction for welded steel connections under monotonic loading based on micromechanical fracture criteria. Eng. Struct. 94(1), 16–28 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Przywara, Failure in structural steels and overview of I-35 W Bridge Collapse. University of Notre Dame (2017). https://www3.nd.edu/~cpssl/group/work/Failure-in-Structural-Steels-and-Overview-of-I-35W-Bridge-Collapse.pdf. Assessed 1 June 2018
  4. 4.
    J. Henrique, J.P. Jaspart, S. Simoes da silva, Connections in steel structures, in VI. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop held at Westin Michigan Avenue Chicago Chicago, Illinois, USA, 23–25 June (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.C. Melenciuc, A.I.S. Tefancu, I. Olteanu, Seismic Design of Steel connections. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic Din Iasi, Universitatea Tehnica (2009). http://www.ce.tuiasi.ro/~bipcons/Archive/140.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2018
  6. 6.
    A.M. Kanvinde, G.G. Deierlein, Physics-based continuum models by ABAQUS to simulate fracture and ultra low cycle fatigue in steel structures (ASCE Structures Congress, Long Beach, CA, 2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Gioncu, Recent development in ductility design of steel structures. Department of Architecture, University ‘Politehnica’ Timisoara, Romania (2017). http://www.dec.uc.pt/~luisss/cost/seminar/artics/Lisx.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2018
  8. 8.
    N.M. Newmark, W.J. Hall, Earthquake spectra and design (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, 1982). ISBN 0-943198-22-4Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Reyes-Salazar, J.O. Rivera-Leyva, A. Haldar, D. De Leon-Escobedo, D. López-López, Ductility, interstory and displacement of steel buildings with perimeter and spatial moment resisting frames, in 15th World conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal 24–28 September (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Besan Alagawani, Yousef Al-Qaryouti, Evaluating overall ductility factor of steel frames with viscoelastic bracing system. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 9(4), 128–137 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Park, Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assembly from laboratory tests, in Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, August 29, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, vol. VIII, pp. 605–616 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Wang, Y. Lyu, G. Li, J.Y.R. Liew, Behavior of single bolt bearing on high strength steel plate. J. Constr. Steel Res. 137, 19–30 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.E. Bartha, J.G. Orbisonb, R. Nukala, Behavior of steel tension member subjected to uniaxial loading. J. Constr. Steel Res. 58(5), 5–8 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Kim, H. Kuwamura, Finite element modelling of bolted connections in thin-walled stainless steel plates under static shear. Thin-Walled Struct. 45, 407–421 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Moze, D. Beg, High strength steel tension splices with one or two bolts. J. Constr. Steel Res. 66, 1000–1010 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Draganić, T. Dokšanović, D. Markulak, Investigation of bearing failure in steel single bolt lap connections. J. Constr. Steel Res. 98, 59–72 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Kiymaz, Bearing strength of stainless steel bolted plates in tension. Steel Compos. Struct. 9(2), 173–189 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.L. Salih, L. Gardner, D.A. Nethercot, Bearing failure in stainless steel bolted connection. Eng. Struct. 33, 549–562 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Kim, H. Kuwamura, Numerical investigation on strength design and curling effect of mechanically fastened joints in cold-formed austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Des. 32, 3942–3956 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T.S. Kim, B.S. Han, Numerical simulation and effect of curling on bolted connections in cold-formed stainless steel. ISIJ Int. 47(6), 920–929 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T.Soo Kim, H. Kuwamura, S. Kim, Y.T. Lee, T. Cho, A parametric study on ultimate strength of single shear bolted connections with curling. Thin-Walled Struct. 46, 38–53 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Može, D. Beg, Stiffness and strength of single bearing bolt connections, design, fabrication and economy of metal structures, in International Conference Proceedings, Miskolc, Hungary, April 2426, pp. 327–332 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Moze, D. Beg, A complete study of bearing stress in single bolt connections. J. Constr. Steel Res. 95, 126–140 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Wen, H. Mahmoud, Numerical simulation of fracture in bolted gusset-plate connections and welded hollow sections, in ASCE Structures Congress, April 2325, Portland, Oregon, pp. 2433–2443 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Wen, H. Mahmoud, Simulation of block shear fracture in bolted connections. J. Constr. Steel Res. 134, 1–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M.J. Samimi, J.A. Marnani, S.M. Seyedzadeh Otaghsaraie, S.R. Seyedzadeh Otaghsaraei, Block shear experimental and numerical studies on hot rolled channel and gusset plate with staggered bolted connection. Thin-Walled Struct. 108, 153–162 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Zeynali, M. JafariSamimi, A. Mazroei, J. Asgari Marnani, M.S. Rohanimanesh, Experimental and numerical study of frictional effects on block shear fracture of steel gusset plates with bolted connections. Thin-Walled Struct. 121, 8–24 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K.K. Adewole, S.O. Adesogan, Finite element single-bolt shear connection shear-out fracture failure analysis. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0457-x Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simulia, Abaqus Documentation (Abaqus Incorporated, Dassault Systemes, 2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Hooputra, H. Gese, H. Dell, H.A. Werner, Comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions. Int. J. Crashworthiness 9(5), 449–464 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K.K. Adewole, S.J. Bull, Prediction of the fracture performance of defect-free steel bars for civil engineering applications using finite element simulation. Constr. Build. Mater. 41, 9–14 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K.K. Adewole, S.J. Bull, Numerical prediction of differences in micromechanical fracture sequence in notched and un-notched wires for civil engineering applications. Civ. Eng. Dimens. 16(2), 87–95 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K.K. Adewole, L.H. Teh, Predicting steel tensile responses and fracture using the phenomenological ductile shear fracture model. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. ASCE 29(2), 06017019-1–06017019-6 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002094 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    K.K. Adewole, Identification of appropriate micromechanical fracture model for predicting fracture performance of steel wires. Glob. J. Res. Eng. Civ. Struct. Eng. 13(3), 24–34 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentUniversity of IbadanIbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations