Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 570–580 | Cite as

Erosion of an Arrow-Type Check Valve Duo to Liquid–Solid Flow Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

  • Xiaodong Zhang
  • Yongsen ChenEmail author
  • Wenwu Yang
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


The computational model of an arrow-type check valve coupling with a combined continuous-phase and discrete-phase models has been used to predict the particle erosion of an arrow-type check valve by computational fluid dynamics method and Fluent software. The flow field distribution of liquid–solid flow is captured under various valve opening conditions. The effects of inlet velocity, particle flow rate and particle diameter are discussed, respectively, in detail, which are also captured the particle erosion of an arrow-type check valve under different flow parameters. The results reveal that the valve opening has an important effect on the pressure, velocity and turbulence intensity. However, the changes are not obvious as the valve opening is more than 15 mm. The results also indicate that the small cylinders of an arrow-type check valve are severe erosion, and erosion rate of an arrow-type check valve is most sensitive to the changes in inlet velocity especially when the speed is over 10 m/s. Compared with inlet velocity, the influence of particle flow rate and particle diameter on erosion is weak.


Arrow-type check valve Discrete-phase model (DPM) Particle erosion Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Liquid–solid flow 



The authors thank the anonymous reviewers and editor for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the research. And this research received support from Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China.


  1. 1.
    J.A.R. Boulanger, C.Y. Wong, M.S. Amir Zamberi et al., Fines erosion: turbophoresis can be harmful. J. Comput. Multiph. Flows 9, 86–102 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.W. Zhang, X.H. Dong, S.G. Chen, Solid particle erosion-wear behaviour of Cr3C2–NiCr coating on Ni-based superalloy. Adv. Mech. Eng. 9, 1–9 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Wang, X.D. Zhang, A reliability analysis of IBOPs in nitrogen drilling of tarim oilfield. Ind. Eng. J. 18, 151–159+164 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Wang, X.D. Zhang, L. Yilan et al., Research on fuzzy reliability approach in view of arrow-type check valves. Mach. Des. Res. 31, 127–130 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Luo, P. Hu, C. He, Research on a new type of forced arrow check valve and its field application. Drill. Prod. Technol. 38, 64–65+10 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Chen, C.J. Wang, Z. Wu, Working mechanism and failure analysis of check valves of BOP(blowout preventer)system in drilling string for safe drilling. Gas Ind. 30, 69–72+129–130 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.J. Zhu, H.N. Zhao, Q. Pan et al., Coupling analysis of fluid-structure interaction and flow erosion of gas-solid flow in elbow pipe. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2014, 1–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.J. Gao, J.H. Zheng, Y.H. Jing et al., Development and application of flu-diameter inside blowout preventer. Drill. Prod. Technol. 34, 65–67+9 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    X. Fang, J.Y. Yao, X.Z. Yin et al., Physics-of-failure models of erosion wear in electrohydraulic servovalve, and erosion wear life prediction method. Mechatronics 23, 1202–1214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Nøkleberg, T. Søntvedt, Erosion of oil&gas industry choke valves using computational fluid dynamics and experiment. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 19, 636–643 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.J. Zhu, Q. Pan, W.L. Zhang et al., CFD simulations of flow erosion and flow-induced deformation of needle valve: effects of operation, structure and fluid parameters. Nucl. Eng. Des. 273, 396–411 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Liu, J.G. Zhao, J.H. Qian, Numerical analysis of cavitation erosion and particle erosion in butterfly valve. Eng. Fail. Anal. 80, 312–324 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.J. Li, C.L. Ji, L. Chen et al., Research on erosion characteristics of ball valve under gas-solid two-phase flow. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 11, 5–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F.J. Wang, Computational fluid dynamics analysis, in Principle and Application of CFD Software, 1st edn. (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2004), pp. 127–130Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Haider, O. Levenspiel, Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technol. 58, 63–70 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Alister, T. Martin, H. David, A numerical investigation of solid particle erosion experienced within oilfield control valves. Wear 216, 184–193 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Grant, W. Tabakoff, Erosion prediction in turbomachinery resulting from environmental solid particle. J. Aircr. 12, 471–478 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y.I. Zhang, B.S. McLaury, Improvements of particle near-Wall velocity and erosion predictions using a commercial CFD code. J. Fluids Eng. 131, 031303–031311 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechatronic EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations