Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 886–895 | Cite as

Cracking Failure Analysis of Inlet Manifold in Hydrogen Reformer Furnace and Prevention

  • Yuqi Ding
  • Jubao Liu
  • Zengtao Chen
  • Feng Qiu
  • Qifa Lu
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

A study of cracking failure of three-way T junctions between inlet manifold and branch pipes in large-scale hydrogen reformer furnaces in terms of pipe material, operation medium, properties of cracking zone material, and vertical displacements of inlet manifold and branch pipes is presented. The results revealed that cracking failures of three-way T junctions can be attributed to the stress concentration, which was caused by incongruous vertical deformations of inlet manifold and branch pipes, as well as variations in horizontal deformation heights of branch pipes. The incongruous displacements of inlet manifold and branch pipes were significantly mitigated by optimization design of the suspension device of the inlet pipe using the finite element method. The vertical displacement differences between inlet manifold and branch pipes and the east–west vertical displacement differences between the five branch pipes were reduced by 48 and 91.5%, respectively. Bending of three-way T junctions was relieved and torsions were eliminated, resulting in mitigation of stress concentration. As a result, the maximum equivalence stress was reduced by 40%, satisfying strength requirements. In this way, cracking failures of inlet manifold in hydrogen reformer furnace were prevented and stable hydrogen production was guaranteed.

Keywords

Hydrogen reformer furnace Inlet manifold Cracking failure of three-way T junction Stress concentration Optimization design 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51604080), funding from China Petroleum (No. 309053), and the youth fund of Northeast Petroleum University (No. NEPUQN2015-1-09).

References

  1. 1.
    I.U. Perez, L.N. Júnior, L. de Oliveira Bueno, L.H. de Almeida, T.F. da Silveira, Short duration overheating in a steam reformer: consequences to the catalyst tubes. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 13(6), 779–786 (2013). (in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.J. Liu, Y. Chen, Variations of the microstructure and mechanical properties of HP40Nb hydrogen reformer tube with time at elevated temperature. Mater. Des. 32(4), 2507–2512 (2011). (in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.H. Sun, L.H. Guo, H.T. Ma, Y. Wu, 石油企业 HP40Nb 钢制氢转化炉炉管破裂分析 (Analyze on rupture HP40Nb steel tubes from hydrogen production reformer furnace of petroleum company). Huagong Xuebao 64(No.SUPPL.1), 159–164 (2013). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Shibasaki, K. Takemura, T. Mohri, Stress corrosion cracking of Nb-containing cast alloys for steam reformer furnace, Ammonia Plant Safety (and Related Facilities), in Proceedings of the 1997 Annual AIChE Ammonia Safety Symposium, vol. 38, pp. 112–118 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.E. Jaske, Creep strength of welds in hydrogen reformer outlet manifold, in Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference 2009, vol. 6 (Part B. Materials and Fabrication), pp. 1385–1390 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.M. Gong, S.T. Tu, H.K.B. Yoon, Damage assessment and maintenance strategy of hydrogen reformer furnace tubes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 6(3), 143–153 (1999). (in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.H. Oza, J.A. Penso, Steam methane reformer furnace outlet manifold component repair experience, in ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 14–18 July 2013 (Paris), vol. 7 (Pressure Vessels and Piping Division), pp. 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y.H. Wu, Z. Gao, C. Yan, 制氢转化炉上集合管开裂的原因分析 (Failure Analyses of the Reformer Gathering Tube Weld Cracked in the Hydrogen Unit). Yun Nan Chem. 40(3), 69–71 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Swarninathan, K. Guguloth, M. Gunjan, Failure analysis and remaining life assessment of service exposed primary reformer heater tubes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 15(4), 311–331 (2008). (in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z.C. Fan, X.D. Chen, J.H. Pan, T. Chen, High temperature pipeline cracking cause analysis of a synthetic ammonia reforming furnace, 2009 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 26–30 July 2009 (Prague), vol. 6 (Part B), pp. 1187–1195 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.C. Xiao, M.C. Zhang, Y.C. Peng, J.X. Dong, Y.H. Wu, Z. Gao, C. Yan, Incoloy800H 合金管材服役过程的开裂机制 (Cracking mechanisms of Incoloy800H alloy tube under servicing conditions). Trans. Mater. Heat Treat. 36(4), 121–125 (2015). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Raj, B. Goswami, S.B. Kumar, Damage analysis of service exposed reformer tubes in petrochemical industries. High Temp. Mater. Process. 33(3), 201–216 (2014). (in English)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.F. Ma, X.F. Ding, J. Zhang, K.T. Ma, L.J. Gong, State analysis on reactor furnace pipe used over a design cycle. Adv. Mater. Res. 535–537(1), 529–532 (2012). (in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z.M. Lu, Z.L. Gao, W. Zhang, Failure analysis of inlet branch pipes of a reformer, 2007 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 22–26 July 2007 (San Antonio), vol. 3, pp. 319–329 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Al-Shahrani, A. Al-Meshari, M. Rabie, Failure analysis of reformer tubes. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 13(6), 731–736 (2013). (in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.L. Zhang, Z.J. Guo, 制氢转化炉上集合管焊缝开裂分析及措施 (Failure Analyses and Countermeasure of Gas Gathering Tube of Reformer in Hydrogen Unit). Petro-Chemical Equip. 39(4), 81–84 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    “Steel Pressure Vessel-analysis Design Standard,” JB4732-2003, Industry standard of the People’s Republic of China, pp. 13–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuqi Ding
    • 1
  • Jubao Liu
    • 1
  • Zengtao Chen
    • 2
  • Feng Qiu
    • 1
  • Qifa Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Mechanical Science and EngineeringNortheast Petroleum UniversityDaqingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations