Interpreting the Evidence: Elemental Analysis in the SEM

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

Failure investigation often involves artifact examination in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). In turn, SEM examination often includes elemental analysis of the surfaces examined, e.g., deposits, a fracture surface, a polished cross section, or other surface. However, elemental data can be misinterpreted without a basic understanding of how they are obtained and the inherent limitations and assumptions of the methods employed. Recent experiences of the authors reinforce the importance of these points.

Keywords

Aluminum casting Blade Chemical analysis techniques Corrosion failure analysis EDS Scanning electron microscope 

References

  1. 1.
    Becker, W.T., Shipley, R.J., Aliya, D.A.: Use of the term defect. J. Fail. Anal. Preven. 5(2), 16–20 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wittke, J.H.: GLG 510 Electron Microprobe Techniques, Class Notes. Northern Arizona University (2008). http://www4.nau.edu/microanalysis/Microprobe/contents.html
  3. 3.
    Drouin, D., Couture, A.R., Joly, D., Tastet, X., Aimez, V., Gauvin, R.: CASINO V2.42—a fast and easy-to-use modeling tool for scanning electron microscopy and microanalysis users. Scanning 29, 92–101 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wagner, L.C.: Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits: Tools and Techniques. Springer (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldstein, J.: Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, vol. 1. Springer (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Product Design for Die Casting Publication E-606, 6th edn., p. 17. North American Die Casters Association (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professional Analysis and Consulting, Inc.Sugar GroveUSA
  2. 2.Engineering Systems, Inc.NorcrossUSA

Personalised recommendations