Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 222–226 | Cite as

Fracture Characteristics of Tensional–Torsional Fatigue Failure of the Archimedes Helix

Case History---Peer-Reviewed
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

“Archimedes helix” (Fig. 1) is very widely applied in worm gear systems (Fig. 2) and is a critical component of transportation systems of raw material in the ceramic industry. Failures of such components from mineral processing plants (production of ceramics) have been addressed in our lab during the last two years. The helixes are manufactured from of ferritic–perlitic steels that are usually protected during service by a hard surface coating. In the recent years, uncoated material is progressively replacing the more expensive hard coated materials primarily for economic reasons. The uncoated material frequently fails owing to the fracture of the component into two pieces (Fig. 3). A serious economic consequence of such failures is the stoppage of the production line until the broken component is replaced, while the cost of the component itself is negligible. Failure analysis was conducted, and it revealed that the primary mechanism of fracture tensional–torsional fatigue. The use of penetrant testing–non destructive testing (PT–NDT) makes it possible, in many cases, to detect the fatigue phenomenon at its early stages and to replace the part during the normal service of the machine, thereby avoiding unexpected plant shutdown.

Keywords

Archimedes helix Worm gear Ferritic-perlitic steel Fracture Fractography Tensional-torsional fatigue 

References

  1. 1.
    Daniel, P.: Dennies: How to Organize and Run a Failure Investigation. ASM International, Materials Park, OH (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harvey, P.D. (ed.): Engineering Properties of Steel. American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benscoter, A.O.: Metallographic Techniques and Microstructures, Carbon and Alloy Steels, ASM Handbook, vol. 9, pp. 165–229. ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fine, M.E., Chung, Y.-W., R.R. McCormick School of Engineering & Applied Science, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University: Fatigue Failure in Metals, ASM Handbook, vol. 19, pp. 63–72. ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donald, J.: Wulpi: Understanding How Components Fail, p. 127. ASM International, Materials Park, OH (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borucki, J.S., Ardrox Inc., Gail Jordan, Howmet Corporation: Liquid Penetrant Inspection, ASM Handbook, vol. 17, p. 71. ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Materials Technology, Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations