Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 386–396 | Cite as

Failure Analysis of Induction Hardened Automotive Axles

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

Rollover accidents in light trucks and cars involving an axle failure frequently raise the question of whether the axle broke causing the rollover or did the axle break as a result of the rollover. Axles in these vehicles are induction hardened medium carbon steel. Bearings ride directly on the axles. This article provides a fractography/fracture mechanic approach to making the determination of when the axle failed. Full scale tests on axle assemblies and suspensions provided data for fracture toughness in the induction hardened outer case on the axle. These tests also demonstrated that roller bearing indentions on the axle journal, cross pin indentation on the end of the axle, and axle bending can be accounted for by spring energy release following axle failure. Pre-existing cracks in the induction hardened axle are small and are often difficult to see without a microscope. The pre-existing crack morphology was intergranular fracture in the axles studied. An estimate of the force required to cause the axle fracture can be made using the measured crack size, fracture toughness determined from these tests, and linear elastic fracture mechanics. The axle can be reliably said to have failed prior to rollover if the estimated force for failure is equal to or less than forces imposed on the axle during events leading to the rollover.

Keywords

Brittle fracture Fracture mechanics Critical crack size Intergranular cracking Axle failure Induction hardened axle Cleavage fracture 

References

  1. 1.
    Fett, G.A.: Characterization of Semi Float Axle Shaft Bending Failures. SAE Tech Paper Series 940732, Feb (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burrier, H., Jr.: ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection, vol. 1, 10th edn., pp. 381–382. ASM, Metals Park, OH (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moyer, C.A.: ASM Handbook, Friction, Lubrication and Wear Technology, vol. 18, pp. 726. ASM, Metals Park, OH (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Handbook Committee: ASM Handbook, Fractography, vol. 12, pp. 270–272. ASM, Metals Park, OH (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meyers, M.A., Chawla, K.K.: Mechanical Metallurgy Principles and Applications, pp. 487–490. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ (1984)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spitzig, W.A., Pellisier, G.E., Beachem, C.D., Hill, M., Warke, R.R.: A Fractographic Analysis of the Relationships Between Fracture Toughness and Surface Topography in Ultrahigh – Strength Steels. Electron Fractigraphy, pp 13–32. ASTM STP 436, ASTM, Philadelphia (1968)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke, C.K.: A Fractographic Study of a Low Nickel Steel. Dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murakami, Y.: Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, vol. I, chap. 9.6. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roe, G.J., Bramfitt, B.L.: ASM Handbook, Properties and Selections; Irons, Steels, and High Performance Alloys, vol. I, Notch Toughness of Steels. ASM, Metals Park, OH (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barsom, J.M., Rolfe, S.T.: Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures, 2nd edn., chap. 4.7. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Löhe, D., Vöhringer, O.: Stability of residual stresses. In: Totten, G., Howes, M., Inoune, T. (eds.) Handbook of Residual Stresses and Deformation of Steel, pp. 60–62. ASM, Metals Park, OH (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgical ConsultingMobileUSA

Personalised recommendations