Advertisement

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 6931–6941 | Cite as

Effect of AC Current Density on the Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior and Mechanism of E690 High-Strength Steel in Simulated Seawater

  • Yue Pan
  • Zhiyong LiuEmail author
  • Yadan Zhang
  • Xiaogang Li
  • Cuiwei Du
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, we studied the impact of alternating current (AC) density on the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior and mechanism of E690 high-strength steel in simulated seawater with electrochemical measurements, U-bend immersion tests and slow strain rate tensile tests. Results demonstrate that AC enhances both anodic and cathodic processes, especially localized anodic dissolution and hydrogen evolution, which manifests as the increase in icorr with AC current density rising. Therefore, AC leads to higher SCC susceptibility. Accordingly, SCC is dominated by anodic dissolution (AD) at low AC current density while in a mixed control of AD and hydrogen embrittlement (HE) at high AC current density as a result of increasing hydrogen concentration. Besides, 50 A/m2 corresponds to the threshold hydrogen concentration of the “hydrogen-induced plasticity to HE” transformation, which is due to the different interactions of dislocation and hydrogen.

Keywords

AC stray current E690 steel SCC Simulated seawater 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from National Environmental Corrosion Platform of China (NECP) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51471034 and 51771028).

References

  1. 1.
    H. Ma, Z. Liu, D. Cuiwei, X. Li, and Z. Cui, Comparative Study of the SCC Behavior of E690 Steel and Simulated HAZ Microstructures in a SO2-Polluted Marine Atmosphere, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 650, p 93–101Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Liu, W. Hao, W. Wei, H. Luo, and X. Li, Fundamental Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking of E690 Steel in Simulated Marine Thin Electrolyte Layer, Corros. Sci., 2019, 148, p 388–396Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    X. Li, D. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Li, D. Cuiwei, and C. Dong, Share Corrosion Data, Nature, 2015, 527, p 441–442Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. Liu, Z. Cui, X. Li, D. Cuiwei, and Y. Xing, Mechanistic Aspect of Stress Corrosion Cracking of X80 Pipeline Steel Under Non-stable Cathodic Polarization, Electro. Comm., 2014, 48, p 127–129Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Wan, D. Song, Z. Liu, D. Cuiwei, Z. Zeng, X. Yang, and X. Li, Effect of Alternating Current on Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior and Mechanism of X80 Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral Solution, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2017, 38, p 458–465Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Wan, D. Song, Z. Liu, D. Cuiwei, Z. Zeng, Z. Wang, D. Ding, and X. Li, Effect of Negative Half-Wave Alternating Current on Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior and Mechanism of X80 Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral Solution, Constr. Build. Mater., 2017, 154, p 580–589Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Q. Liu, W. Wu, Y. Pan, Z.Y. Liu, X.C. Zhou, and X.G. Li, Electrochemical Mechanism of Stress Corrosion Cracking of API, X70 Pipeline Steel Under Different AC Frequencies, Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 171, p 622–633Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Tang, D. Yanxia, X. Li, Y. Liang, and L. Minxu, Effect of Alternating Current on the Performance of Magnesium Sacrificial Anode, Mater. Design, 2016, 93, p 133–145Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Guo, T. Meng, D. Wang, H. Tan, and R. He, Experimental Research on the Corrosion of X Series Pipeline Steels Under Alternating Current Interference, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2017, 78, p 87–98Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Shkirskiy, A. Maltseva, K. Ogle, and P. Volovitch, Environmental Effects on Selective Dissolution from ZnAlMg Alloy Under Low Frequency Alternating Current Perturbations, Electrochemi. Acta, 2017, 238, p 397–409Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Wei, Q. Qin, Y. Bai, Yu Changkun, X. Jin, C. Sun, and W. Ke, Short-Period Corrosion of X80 Pipeline Steel Induced by AC Current in Acidic Red Soil, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2019, 105, p 156–175Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Zhang, P.R. Vairavanathan, and S.B. Lalvani, Perturbation Method Analysis of AC-Induced Corrosion, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50, p 1664–1671Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Goidanich, L. Lazzari, and M. Ormellese, AC Corrosion-Part 1: Effects on Overpotentials of Anodic and Cathodic Processes, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, p 491–497Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Goidanich, L. Lazzari, and M. Ormellese, AC Corrosion-Part 2: Parameters Influencing Corrosion Rate, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, p 916–922Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Kuang and Y.F. Cheng, Understand the AC Induced Pitting Corrosion of Pipelines in Both High pH and Neutral pH Carbonate/Bicarbonate Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2014, 85, p 304–310Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Hao, Z. Liu, W. Wei, X. Li, D. Cuiwei, and D. Zhang, Electrochemical Characterization and Stress Corrosion Cracking of E690 High Strength Steel in Wet-Dry Cyclic Marine Environments, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2018, 710, p 318–328Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Ma, Z. Liu, D. Cuiwei, H. Wang, X. Li, D. Zhang, and Z. Cui, Stress Corrosion Cracking of E690 Steel as a Welded Joint in a Simulated Marine Atmosphere Containing Sulphur Dioxide, Corros. Sci., 2015, 100, p 627–641Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chinese National Standard for Stress Corrosion Cracking Tests. GB/T 15970, 2007Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Zhu, D. Cuiwei, X. Li, Z. Liu, H. Li, and D. Zhang, Effect of AC on Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior and Mechanism of X80 Pipeline Steel in Carbonate/Bicarbonate Solution, Corros. Sci., 2014, 87, p 224–232Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Wei, Y. Pan, Z. Liu, D. Cuiwei, and X. Li, Electrochemical and Stress Corrosion Mechanism of Submarine Pipeline in Simulated Seawater in Presence of Different Alternating Current Densities, Materials, 2018, 11(7), p 1074Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Dai, W. Jun, L. Zhang, Y. Sun, Y. Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Jiang, and J. Li, Alternating Voltage Induced Oscillation on Electrochemical Behavior and Pitting Corrosion in Duplex 2205 Steel, Corros, Mater, 2018,  https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201810438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Cui, F. Ge, Y. Lin, L. Wang, L. Lei, H. Tian, Yu Mingdong, and X. Wang, Corrosion Behavior of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy in the Chloride Solution Containing Ammonium Nitrate, Electrochemi. Acta, 2018, 278, p 421–437Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Z. Jiang, D. Yanxia, L. Minxu, Y. Zhang, D. Tang, and L. Dong, New Findings on the Factors Accelerating AC Corrosion of Buried Pipeline, Corros. Sci., 2014, 81, p 1–10Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Nazarov, F. Vucko, and D. Thierry, Scanning Kelvin Probe for Detection of the Hydrogen Induced by Atmospheric Corrosion of Ultra-high Strength Steel, Electrochemi. Acta, 2016, 216, p 130–139Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Chen, S. Zheng, J. Zhou, P. Wang, L. Chen, and Y. Qi, Influence of H2S Interaction with Prestrain on the Mechanical Properties of High-Strength X80 Steel, Inter. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41, p 10412–10420Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Z.Y. Liu, X.Z. Wang, C.W. Du, J.K. Li, and X.G. Li, Effect of Hydrogen-Induced Plasticity on the Stress Corrosion Cracking of X70 Pipeline Steel in Simulated Soil Environments, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2016, 658, p 348–354Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Tang, Stray Alternating Current (AC) Induced Corrosion of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete, Corros. Sci., 2019, 152, p 153–171Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Xue, X. Wei, J. Dong, C. Wang, and W. Ke, Effect of Chloride Ion on Corrosion Behavior of Low Carbon Steel in 0.1 M NaHCO3 Solution with Different Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35, p 596–603Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Büchler, Alternating Current Corrosion of Cathodically Protected Pipelines: Discussion of the Involved Processes and Their Consequences on the Critical Interference Values, Mater. Corros., 2012, 63, p 1181–1187Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. Wen, J. Li, S. Wang, and Y. Yang, Experimental Study on Stray Current Corrosion of Coated Pipeline Steel, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2015, 27, p 1555–1561Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L. Wang, L. Cheng, J. Li, Z. Zhu, S. Bai, and Z. Cui, Combined Effect of Alternating Current Interference and Cathodic Protection on Pitting Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of X70 Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Environment, Materials, 2018, 11, p 465Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Z.Y. Liu, X.G. Li, C.W. Du, and Y.F. Cheng, Local Additional Potential Model for Effect of Strain Rate on SCC of Pipeline Steel in an Acidic Soil Solution, Corros. Sci., 2009, 51, p 2863–2871Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Z.Y. Liu, X.G. Li, and Y.F. Cheng, Electrochemical State Conversion Model for Occurrence of Pitting Corrosion on Cathodically Polarized Carbon Steel in a Near-Neutral pH Solution, Electrochemi. Acta, 2011, 56, p 4167–4175Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    X.S. Du, W.B. Cao, C.D. Wang, S.J. Li, J.Y. Zhao, and Y.F. Sun, Effect of Microstructures and Inclusions on Hydrogen-Induced Cracking and Blistering of A537 Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 642, p 181–186Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    C. Zhou, B. Ye, Y. Song, T. Cui, X. Peng, and L. Zhang, Effects of Internal Hydrogen and Surface-Absorbed Hydrogen on the Hydrogen Embrittlement of X80 Pipeline Steel, Inter. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2019, 44, p 22547–22558Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    W. Mai and S. Soghrati, A Phase Field Model for Simulating the Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiated from Pits, Corros. Sci., 2017, 125, p 87–98Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    D.A. Horner, B.J. Connolly, S. Zhou, L. Crocker, and A. Turnbull, Novel Images of the Evolution of Stress Corrosion Cracks from Corrosion Pits, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53, p 3466–3485Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    L. Wang, J. Xin, L. Cheng, K. Zhao, B. Sun, J. Li, X. Wang, and Z. Cui, Influence of Inclusions on Initiation of Pitting Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking of X70 Steel in Near-Neutral pH Environment, Corros. Sci., 2019, 147, p 108–127Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    I.M. Dmytrakh, R.L. Leshchak, A.M. Syrotyuk, and R.A. Barna, Effect of Hydrogen Concentration on Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour in Pipeline Steel, Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, p 6401–6408Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    K.S. de Assis, M.A. Lage, G. Guttemberg, F.P. dos Santos, and O.R. Mattos, Influence of Hydrogen on Plasticity Around the Crack Tip in High Strength Steels, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2017, 176, p 116–125Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    S.D. Pu and S.W. Ooi, Hydrogen Transport by Dislocation Movement in Austenitic Steel, Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 761, p 138059Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    H. Tian, X. Wang, Z. Cui, L. Qiankun, L. Wang, L. Lei, Y. Li, and D. Zhang, Electrochemical Corrosion, Hydrogen Permeation and Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of E690 Steel in Thiosulfate-Containing Artificial Seawater, Corros. Sci., 2018, 144, p 145–162Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    E. Ohaeri, U. Eduok, and J. Szpunar, Hydrogen Related Degradation in Pipeline Steel: A Review, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2018, 43, p 14584–14617Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    V. Yakubov, M. Lin, A.A. Volinsky, L. Qiao, and L. Guo, The Hydrogen-Induced Pitting Corrosion Mechanism in Duplex Stainless Steel Studied by Current-Sensing Atomic Force Microscopy, npj Mater. Degrad., 2018, 39, p 2.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-018-0062-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yue Pan
    • 1
  • Zhiyong Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yadan Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiaogang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cuiwei Du
    • 1
  1. 1.Corrosion and Protection CenterUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.Ningbo Institute of Material Technology and EngineeringChinese Academy of SciencesNingboChina

Personalised recommendations