Advertisement

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 1469–1479 | Cite as

Corrosion of 907 Steel Influenced by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria

  • Juna Chen
  • Jiajia Wu
  • Peng Wang
  • Dun ZhangEmail author
  • Shiqiang Chen
  • Faqi Tan
Article
  • 496 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) on the corrosion of 907 steel was investigated. Results demonstrated that the chemical composition of corrosion products, the corrosion rate, and corrosion type were altered due to the adherence of SRB and the subsequent formation of biofilm on the 907 steel surface. Different from the case in sterile medium that ferrous oxides predominated in the corrosion products, ferrous sulfide was an important component in SRB-containing medium. Meanwhile, corrosion of 907 steel was enhanced by SRB, and the corrosion rate was dependent on their metabolic activity, which increased, stabilized, and decreased in the exponential growth, death, and residual phases, respectively. Furthermore, the corrosion type was changed from uniform corrosion to localized corrosion with the introduction of SRB, and the development process was analyzed based on the current distribution map of wire beam electrodes. In sterile medium, the maximum current density decreased with the immersion time extended, and there were no significant anodic current peaks in the late period, while in SRB-containing medium, the ratio between cathodic areas and anodic areas was high in the exponential growth phase, and stable anodic sites formed gradually in death and residual phases, which facilitated the development of localized corrosion.

Keywords

907 steel localized corrosion microbiologically influenced corrosion sulfate-reducing bacteria wire beam electrode 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0300604), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41806087 and 51771180), Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (No. 2018GGX104021), and AoShan Talents Cultivation Program supported by Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (2017ASTCP-ES02).

References

  1. 1.
    M.A. Javed, P.R. Stoddart, E.A. Palombo, S.L. Mcarthur, and S.A. Wade, Inhibition or Acceleration: Bacterial Test Media Can Determine the Course of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion, Corros. Sci., 2014, 86(9), p 149–158Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.J. Wikiel, I. Datsenko, M. Vera, and W. Sand, Impact of Desulfovibrio Alaskensis Biofilms on Corrosion Behaviour of Carbon Steel in Marine Environment, Bioelectrochemistry, 2014, 97(1), p 52–60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.A.H. von Wolzogen Kuhr and L.R. Van der Vlugt, Degrafiteering Van Gietijzer Als Electrobiochemisch Proces in Anaerobe Gronden, Water (den Haag), 1934, 18, p 147–165 (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Lee and W.G. Characklis, Corrosion of Mild Steel Under Anaerobic Biofilm, Corrosion, 1993, 49(3), p 186–199Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I.B. Beech and C.W.S. Cheung, Interactions of Exopolymers Produced by Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria with Metal Ions, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 1995, 35(1), p 59–72Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.T. Dinh, J. Kuever, M. Mussmann, A.W. Hassel, M. Stratmann, and F. Widdel, Iron Corrosion by Novel Anaerobic Microorganisms, Nature, 2004, 427, p 829–832Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Li, D. Xu, Y. Li, H. Feng, Z. Liu, X. Li, T. Gu, and K. Yang, Extracellular Electron Transfer is a Bottleneck in the Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion of C1018 Carbon Steel by the Biofilm of Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris, PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(8), p e0136183Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. Yao, C. Cai, J. Li, L. Song, and D. Liu, Early Stage Galvanic Corrosion of 5383 Al Alloy Coupled with 907 Steel and Aluminum Bronze in 3.5% NaCl Solution, Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol., 2015, 27(5), p 419–424Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    X. Zhang, X. Du, C. Cai, and Z. Zhang, Galvanic Corrosion Behavior of 907A/Titanium Couple in Simulated Seawater, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2017, 12, p 2412–2428Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Duan, X. Chen, and C. Lin, 907A Steel Corrosion in Artificial Sulfate Reducing Bacteria Biofilm, J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2011, 31(6), p 453–456Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Chen, Y.F. Cheng, and G. Voordouw, A Comparative Study of Corrosion of 316L Stainless Steel in Biotic and Abiotic Sulfide Environments, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2017, 120, p 91–96Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Liu, C. Fu, T. Gu, G. Zhang, Y. Lv, H. Wang, and H. Liu, Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel in the Presence of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria and Iron Oxidizing Bacteria Cultured in Oilfield Produced Water, Corros. Sci., 2015, 100, p 484–495Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Franklin, D.C. White, B. Little, R. Ray, and R. Pope, The Role of Bacteria in Pit Propagation of Carbon Steel, Biofouling, 2000, 15(1–3), p 13–23Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Moreira, M.K. Schütz, M. Libert, B. Tribollet, and V. Vivier, Influence of Hydrogen-Oxidizing Bacteria on the Corrosion of Low Carbon Steel: Local Electrochemical Investigations, Bioelectrochemistry, 2014, 97(2), p 69–75Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z.H. Dong, W. Shi, M.R. Hong, and G.A. Zhang, Heterogeneous Corrosion of Mild Steel Under SRB-Biofilm Characterised by Electrochemical Mapping Technique, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53(9), p 2978–2987Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Chen, P. Wang, and D. Zhang, Corrosion Behavior of Copper under Biofilm of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria, Corros. Sci., 2014, 87(5), p 407–415Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Chen and D. Zhang, Effects of Metabolic Activity of Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria on Heterogeneous Corrosion Behaviors of Copper in Seawater, Mater. Corros., 2018, 1, p 1.  https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201709945 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Teske, C. Wawer, G. Muyzer, and N.B. Ramsing, Distribution of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in a Stratified Fjord (Mariager Fjord, Denmark) as Evaluated by Most-Probable-Number Counts and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis of PCR-Amplified Ribosomal DNA Fragments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1996, 62(4), p 1405–1415Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.S. Seo, S.M. Michalek, and M.H. Nahm, Lipoteichoic Acid is Important in Innate Immune Responses to Gram-Positive Bacteria, Infect. Immun., 2008, 76(1), p 206–213Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Tong, A. Shereef, J. Wu, T.T.B. Chu, J.J. Kelly, J.F. Gaillard, and K.A. Gray, Effects of Material Morphology on the Phototoxicity of Nano-TiO2 to Bacteria, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(21), p 12486–12495Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Wells, M. Gösch, R. Rigler, H. Harms, T. Lasser, and V.D.M. Jr., Ultrasensitive Reporter Protein Detection in Genetically Engineered Bacteria, Analyt. Chem., 2005, 77(9), p 2683–2689Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Chen, Q. Tang, J.M. Senko, G. Cheng, B.M.Z. Newby, H. Castaneda, and L.K. Ju, Long-Term Survival of Desulfovibrio vulgaris on Carbon Steel and Associated Pitting Corrosion, Corros. Sci., 2015, 90(90), p 89–100Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Luo, C.F. Dong, X.G. Li, and K. Xiao, The Electrochemical Behaviour of 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel in Alkaline Solutions with Different pH in the Presence of Chloride, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 64(1), p 211–220Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    V.P. Shinde and P.P. Patil, Investigation on Role of Monomer(s) during Electrochemical Polymerization of Aniline and Its Derivatives on Low Carbon Steel by XPS, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 78(9), p 483–494Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Z. Tang, S. Hong, W. Xiao, and J. Taylor, Characteristics of Iron Corrosion Scales Established Under Blending of Ground, Surface, and Saline Waters and Their Impacts on Iron Release in the Pipe Distribution System, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48(2), p 322–342Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Wang, J. Wang, C. Li, G. Zhao, and X. Wang, A High-Performance Multifunctional Lubricant Additive for Water-Glycol Hydraulic Fluid, Tribol. Lett., 2011, 43(2), p 235–245Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Ma, Y. Zhang, Z. Guo, and N. Gu, Facile Synthesis of Ultrathin Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoplates by Schikorr Reaction, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2013, 8(1), p 16Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Enning and J. Garrelfs, Corrosion of Iron by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: New Views of an Old Problem, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2014, 80(4), p 1226–1236Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y.S. Tan, M.P. Srinivasan, S.O. Pehkonen, and S.Y.M. Chooi, Self-Assembled Organic Thin Films on Electroplated Copper for Prevention of Corrosion, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 2004, 22(4), p 1917–1925Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Wieckowski, A. Kolics, E.D. Eliadis, R.C. Alkire, and J.C. Polkinghorne, Radioactive Labeling, Electrochemical, and Ultrahigh Vacuum Study of Sulfate Adsorption on Type 316 Stainless Steel, Corrosion, 2012, 54(10), p 800–813Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C.M. Menendez, V. Jovancicevic, S. Ramachandran, M. Morton, and D. Stegmann, Assessment of Corrosion Under Iron Sulfide Deposits and CO2/H2S Conditions, Corrosion, 2013, 69(2), p 145–156Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Kuang, J. Wang, L. Yan, and D. Zhang, Effects of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria on the Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel, Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52(20), p 6084–6088Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    W.H. Dickinson, F. Caccavo Jr., and Z. Lewandowski, The Ennoblement of Stainless Steel by Manganic Oxide Biofouling, Corros. Sci., 1996, 38(8), p 1407–1422Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. Xu, J. Duan, C. Lin, and B. Hou, Influence of Marine Aerobic Biofilms on Corrosion of 316L Stainless Steel, J. Iron. Steel Res. Int., 2015, 22(8), p 715–720Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Liao, H. Fukui, T. Urakami, and H. Morisaki, Effect of Biofilm on Ennoblement and Localized Corrosion of Stainless Steel in Fresh Dam-Water, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52(4), p 1393–1403Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    X. Liao, F. Cao, L. Zheng, W. Liu, A. Chen, J. Zhang, and C. Cao, Corrosion Behaviour of Copper under Chloride-Containing Thin Electrolyte Layer, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53(10), p 3289–3298Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Q. Qu, H. Yue, W. Lei, H. Xu, L. Lei, Y. Chen, and Z. Ding, Corrosion Behavior of Cold Rolled Steel in Artificial Seawater in the Presence of Bacillus subtilis C2, Corros. Sci., 2015, 91(3), p 321–329Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    C.L. Alexander, B. Tribollet, and M.E. Orazem, Contribution of Surface Distributions to Constant-Phase-Element (CPE) Behavior: 1. Influence of Roughness, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 173, p 416–424Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. Kwak, G.M. Zinkhan, and J.R. Dominick, Understanding Microbial Inhibition of Corrosion: A Comprehensive Overview, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2009, 63(7), p 896–900Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y. Wan, D. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Li, and B. Hou, Influence of Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria on Environmental Parameters and Marine Corrosion Behavior of Q235 Steel in Aerobic Conditions, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55(5), p 1528–1534Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H. Castaneda and X.D. Benetton, SRB-Biofilm Influence in Active Corrosion Sites Formed at the Steel-Electrolyte Interface When Exposed to Artificial Seawater Conditions, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50(4), p 1169–1183Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juna Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jiajia Wu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Peng Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Dun Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  • Shiqiang Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Faqi Tan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Corrosion and Bio-fouling, Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Open Studio for Marine Corrosion and ProtectionQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Naval Aeronautical Engineering InstituteYantaiChina
  5. 5.Center for Ocean Mega-ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations