Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 1122–1131 | Cite as

Study on Interfacial Phenomena in Aluminum–Aluminum Bimetal Fabricated by Extrusion at Different Temperatures

  • Junfeng Zhao
  • Qiulin LiEmail author


Aluminum–aluminum bimetal was prepared by spray-formed Al22Si alloy and ZL102 through extrusion process under solid–solid state, semisolid state and solid–liquid state. The microstructures and bonding strength of the bimetallic interface were studied, and the fracture behaviors of different bimetallic states were compared. The results showed that perfect metallic bond is produced through the semisolid extrusion process. The bimetal through solid–solid extrusion process is a large number of particles extruding through gaps among the cracked oxide layers, thus realized the metallurgical combination with the virgin metal. The process of semisolid extrusion is to break the oxide film under the temperature and pressure to achieve the bimetallic bonding. Besides, the hard particles wrapped by liquid metal can also enhance bonding strength. The tensile strength of bimetal fabricated by semisolid extrusion shows more promising results than that made by solid–solid combination and solid–liquid combination; the tensile strength improved from 83.3 to 120.5 MPa, an increase of about 45%. The process presented in this study provides a promising and effective approach for achieving Al22Si/Zl102 bimetal with high-quality metallurgical bonded interface.


bimetal bonding strength interface microstructure oxide film 



This study was supported by the Joint Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. U1530108. The authors sincerely acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments to further improve the quality of the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    B. Zheng, Q. Zhang, J. Borken-Kleefeld, H. Huo, D. Guan, Z. Klimont et al., How Will Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Motor Vehicles be Constrained in China Around 2030?, Appl Energy, 2015, 156, p 230–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.J. Réquia Júnior, H.L. Roig, and P. Koutrakis, A Novel Land Use Approach for Assessment of Human Health: The Relationship Between Urban Structure Types and Cardiorespiratory Disease Risk, Environ Int, 2015, 85, p 334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.J.M. Papis, J.F. Löffler, and P.J. Uggowitzer, Interface Formation Between Liquid and Solid Mg Alloys—An Approach to Continuously Metallurgic Joining of Magnesium Parts, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2010, 527, p 2274–2279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Divandari and A.R.V. Golpayegani, Study of Al/Cu Rich Phases Formed in A356 Alloy by Inserting Cu Wire in Pattern in LFC Process, Mater Des, 2009, 30, p 3279–3285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Wang, M. Fu, X. Li, J. Wang, and X. Su, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Si Eutectic Alloy Modified with Al-3P Master Alloy, J Mater Process Technol, 2018, 255, p 105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Wang, G. Luo, J. Zhang, Q. Shen, and L. Zhang, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Diffusion-Bonded Mg-Al Joints Using Silver Film as Interlayer, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2013, 559, p 868–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Zhang, G. Luo, Y. Wang, Q. Shen, and L. Zhang, An Investigation on Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum and Magnesium Using a Ni Interlayer, Mater Lett, 2012, 83, p 189–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Hajjari, M. Divandari, S.H. Razavi, T. Homma, and S. Kamado, Intermetallic Compounds and Antiphase Domains in Al/Mg Compound Casting, Intermetallics, 2012, 23, p 182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Peng, L. Yajiang, G. Haoran, and W. Juan, Investigation of Interfacial Structure of Mg/Al Vacuum Diffusion-Bonded Joint, Vacuum, 2006, 80, p 395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.K. Dey, M.J. Lukitsch, M.P. Balogh, X. Meng-Burany, and A.T. Alpas, Ultra-Mild Wear Mechanisms of Al-12.6 wt.%Si Alloys at Elevated Temperature, Wear, 2011, 271, p 1842–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Meenia, F. Khan, S. Babu, R.J. Immanuel, S.K. Panigrahi, and G.D. Janakiram, Particle Refinement and Fine-Grain Formation Leading to Enhanced Mechanical Behaviour in a Hypo-Eutectic Al-Si Alloy Subjected to Multi-pass Friction Stir Processing, Mater Charact, 2016, 113, p 134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K.V. Ojha, A. Tomar, D. Singh, and G.C. Kaushal, Shape, Microstructure and Wear of Spray Formed Hypoeutectic Al-Si Alloys, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2008, 487, p 591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Raju and S.N. Ojha, Effect of Spray Forming on the Microstructure and Wear Properties of Al-Si Alloys, Proc Mater Sci, 2014, 5, p 345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    X. Zhou, Y. Dong, C. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Yu, J. Chen et al., Transient Liquid Phase Bonding of CLAM/CLAM Steels with Ni-Based Amorphous Foil as the Interlayer, Mater Des, 2015, 88, p 1321–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Koerner, M. Schwankl, and D. Himmler, Aluminum–Aluminum Compound Castings by Electroless Deposited Zinc Layers, J Mater Process Technol, 2014, 214, p 1094–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Liu, Q. Wang, Y. Sui, Q. Wang, and W. Ding, An Investigation into Aluminum–Aluminum Bimetal Fabrication by Squeeze Casting, Mater Des, 2015, 68, p 8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Rübner, M. Günzl, C. Körner, and R.F. Singer, Aluminium–Aluminium Compound Fabrication by High Pressure Die Casting, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2011, 528, p 7024–7029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L.J. Yang, The Effect of Casting Temperature on the Properties of Squeeze Cast Aluminium and Zinc Alloys, J Mater Process Technol, 2003, 140, p 391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Rübner, M. Günzl, C. Körner, and R.F. Singer, Aluminium–Aluminium Compound Fabrication by High Pressure Die Casting, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2011, 528, p 7024–7029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.J. Zhang, J.T. Fan, D.J. Liu, M.D. Zhang, P.F. Yu, Q. Jing et al., The Microstructural Evolution and Hardness of the Equiatomic CoCrCuFeNi High-Entropy Alloy in the Semi-solid State, J Alloy Compd, 2018, 745, p 75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Zhang, G. Wu, W. Liu, L. Zhang, S. Pang, Y. Wang et al., Effects of Processing Parameters and Ca Content on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Squeeze Casting AZ91-Ca Alloys, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2014, 595, p 109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y.D. Jia, F.Y. Cao, Z.L. Ning, X.B. Sun, and J.F. Sun, Hot Deformation Behavior of Spray Formed Al-22Si-5Fe-3Cu-1 Mg Alloy, Trans Nonferr Metals Soc of China, 2011, 21, p s299–s303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Ammar, Quality of Aluminum-Silicon Casting Alloys, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, 2012Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    K.J.M. Papis, B. Hallstedt, J.F. Löffler, and P.J. Uggowitzer, Interface Formation in Aluminium–Aluminium Compound Casting, Acta Mater, 2008, 56, p 3036–3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Xu, A.A. Luo, Y. Chen, and A.K. Sachdev, Interfacial Phenomena in Magnesium/Aluminum Bi-Metallic Castings, Mater Sci Eng, A, 2014, 595, p 154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    V.L. Kolmogorov and A.G. Zalazinsky, On Metal Joining and the Prediction of the Strength of Solid-Phase Joints, J Mater Process Technol, 1998, 75, p 157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    X.W. Zhu, R.C. Wang, J. Peng, and C.Q. Peng, Microstructure Evolution of Spray-Formed Hypereutectic Al-Si Alloys in Semisolid Reheating Process, Trans Nonferr Metals Soc of China, 2014, 24, p 1766–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B.M. Afshari, S.S. Mirjavadi, Y.A. Dolatabad, M. Aghajani, M.K.B. Givi, M. Alipour et al., Effects of Pre-deformation on Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Produced by Modified Strain Induced Melt Activation, Trans Nonferr Metals Soc of China, 2016, 26, p 2283–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M.A. Bayoumi, M.I. Negm, and A.M. El-Gohry, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Extruded Al-Si Alloy (A356) in the Semi-solid State, Mater Des, 2009, 30, p 4469–4477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Y, Liu J, Wang W, and Liu G, Microstructures and Properties of Al-45%Si Alloy Prepared by Liquid–Solid Separation Process and Spray Deposition, Trans Nonferr Metals Soc of China, 2013, 23, p 970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M.A. Moustafa, Effect of Iron Content on the Formation of β-Al5FeSi and Porosity in Al-Si Eutectic Alloys, J Mater Process Technol, 2009, 209, p 605–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    H.R. Le, M. Sutcliffe, P.Z. Wang, and G.T. Burstein, Surface Oxide Fracture in Cold Aluminium Rolling, Acta Mater, 2004, 52, p 911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Jiao, J. Dong, M. Zhang, and L. Zheng, Influencing Factors and Bonding Mechanism of Hot Rolling Bonded Bimetals, Mater Rev, 2009, 23, p 59–62Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.W. Yeh and W.P. Liu, The Cracking Mechanism of Silicon Particles in an A357 Aluminum Alloy, Metall Mater Trans A, 1996, 27, p 3558–3568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    W. Bochniak and A. Korbel, Plastic Flow of Aluminium Extruded Under Complex Conditions, Mater Sci Technol, 2000, 16, p 664–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Materials Institute, Graduate School at ShenzhenTsinghua UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Service SafetyShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations