Advertisement

Improved Passivation Effect Due to Controlled Smoothing of the CdTe-HgCdTe Interface Gradient by Thermal Annealing

  • R. HaakenaasenEmail author
  • E. Selvig
  • A. C. Heier
  • T. Lorentzen
  • L. Trosdahl-Iversen
U.S. Workshop on Physics and Chemistry of II-VI Materials 2018
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. U.S. Workshop on Physics and Chemistry of II-VI Materials 2018

Abstract

HgCdTe films grown by liquid phase epitaxy were passivated with CdTe grown by molecular beam epitaxy. A series of annealing tests with different temperatures and durations were then carried out in order to reach a two-fold goal: to smooth the gradients in Hg and Cd content across the HgCdTe film-passivation interface, and to create a Hg vacancy concentration of ∼ 1–2 × 1016 cm−3. We want the composition gradient to prevent minority carrier electrons from reaching the actual interface, as this may contain recombination centers that trap the electrons. Four different temperature–time combinations were tried for the first part of the annealing procedure (the smoothing of gradients), while they were all followed by a Hg vacancy procedure of 250°C for 18–24 h. Then some samples were cleaved, and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) line profiles were recorded on the cross sections to monitor the composition gradients. We could clearly see differences between the profiles from samples with the higher-temperature annealing, the lower-temperature annealing and no annealing. Secondary ion mass spectroscopy profiles on two samples verified the EDS results. On another subset of similar samples, planar diodes were processed and resistance-area (RA) values determined. The current–voltage (I–V) curves from the high-temperature annealed samples seemed dominated by leakage current and did generally not display diode characteristics. This could be explained by their EDS profiles, which showed a lot of Hg in the entire passivation layer. The EDS profiles from the three low-temperature annealing procedures were very similar, but planar diode I–V curves revealed diodes of varying quality, and their RA values were used to differentiate among them. The optimal annealing procedure was 300°C for 4 h, followed by 250°C for 24 h.

Keywords

HgCdTe CdTe passivation anneal composition gradient vacancy doping planar diode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tron Arne Nilsen at the Dept. for Physical Electronics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, for measuring the x-ray diffraction scan in Fig. 1.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Haakenaasen, H. Steen, E. Selvig, T. Lorentzen, A.D. van Rheenen, L. Trosdahl-Iversen, H. Syversen, D. Hall, and N. Gordon, J. Electron. Mater. 34, 922 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Haakenaasen, H. Steen, T. Lorentzen, L. Trosdahl-Iversen, A.D. van Rheenen, and H. Syversen, J. Electron. Mater. 31, 710 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Haakenaasen, T. Moen, T. Colin, H. Steen, and L. Trosdahl-Iversen, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 427 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.R. Vydyanath, J. Cryst. Growth 161, 64 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Capper, Properties of narrow Gap Cadmium-based Compounds, Emis Data Reviews Series No. 10, ed. P. Capper (INSPEC, UK, 1994), p. 151.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.F. Schaake, J. Electron. Mater. 14, 513 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Pelliciari, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. 29, 1 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.L. Destefanis, J. Cryst. Growth 86, 700 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Takami, Z. Kawazu, T. Takiguchi, K. Mitsui, K. Mizuguchi, T. Murotani, K. Yasumura, T. Kanno, and M. Saga, J. Cryst. Growth 117, 16 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.A. Bakhtin, S.A. Dvoretskii, V.S. Varavin, A.P. Korobkin, N.N. Michailov, I.B. Sabinina, and Y.G. Sidorov, Semiconductors 38, 1172 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Pal, A. Malik, V. Srivastav, B.L. Sharma, V.R. Balakrishnan, V. Dhar, and H.P. Vyas, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 53, 2727 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.S. Lee, K.K. Choi, Y.T. Young, H.K. Kim, J.M. Kim, Y.H. Kim, J.M. Chang, W.S. Song, S.U. Kim, M.J. Park, and S.D. Lee, J. Electron. Mater. 26, 552 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.Y. An, J.S. Kim, D.W. Seo, and S.H. Suh, J. Electron. Mater. 31, 683 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L.S. Hirsh, R. Haakenaasen, T. Colin, K.S. Ziemer, C.D. Stinespring, S. Lovold, and T.H. Myers, J. Electron. Mater. 28, 810 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FFI – Norwegian Defence Research EstablishmentKjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations