Advertisement

Effects of Inhibitor on ZnS Thin Films Fabricated by Electrodeposition

  • Barış AltıokkaEmail author
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, electrodeposition was employed to produce zinc sulfide (ZnS) thin films. Sodium sulfite (Na2SO3) was used as an inhibitor in this work and some physical effects of the inhibitor were investigated in detail. Structural analysis of the ZnS thin films were carried out by using an x-ray diffractometer (XRD). According to the XRD, ZnO-free thin films of ZnS films could be obtained via inhibitor. It was discovered that Na2SO3 was a good inhibitor for electrodeposition of ZnS. Besides, the ZnO and ZnS ratio was varied by using Na2SO3 and, thus, the band gaps of the films were varied from 3.18 eV to 3.93 eV. Morphologic properties were investigated by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM images showed that compact- and pinhole-free ZnS films could be produced by using Na2SO3 as inhibitors.

Keywords

Thin films ZnS electrodeposition inhibitor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Izi, G. Heidaria, S.M.M. Khoieb, and J. Najafi, Surf. Eng. App. Elect. 53, 245 (2017).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Zhu, J.F. Huang, Y. Wang, L.Y. Cao, H.Y. He, and J.P. Wu, Surf. Eng. 27, 42 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.S. Chiad, W.A. Jabbar, and N.F. Habubi, J. Arkansas Acad. Sci. 65, 39 (2011).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.M.M.N. Hennayaka and H.S. Lee, Thin Solid Films 548, 86 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Altıokka, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40, 2085 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Shapova, M. Sozanskyi, I. Yatchyshyn, B. Kulyk, M. Shpotyuk, and R. Gladyshevskii, Chem. & Chem. Tech. 10, 317 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.L. Madugu, O.I.-O. Olusola, O.K. Echendu, B. Kadem, and I.M. Dharmadasa, J. Electron. Mater. 45, 2710 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O.K. Echendu and I.M. Dharmadasa, Energies 8, 4416 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O.K. Echendu and I.M. Dharmadasa, J. Electron. Mater. 43, 791 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Altıokka, M.C. Baykul, and M.R. Altıokka, J. Cryst. Growth 384, 50 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Altıokka and A.K. Yıldırım, Karaelmas Sci. Eng. J. 8, 331 (2018).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.N. Bhowmik, M.N. Murty, and E.S. Srinadhu, PMC Phys. 1, 20 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Begum, A. Hussain, and A. Rahman, Beilstein J. Nanotech. 3, 438 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Akaltun, M.A. Yıldırım, A. Ateş, and M. Yıldırım, Opt. Commun. 284, 2307 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Bai, Z. Zhang, W. Tian, X. He, Y. Ma, Y. Zhao, and Z. Chai, J. Nanopart. Res. 12, 1645 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bilecik Şeyh Edebali UniversityBilecikTurkey

Personalised recommendations