Advertisement

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 2508–2516 | Cite as

Carbon Bonding State Has a Small Effect on Melting of Direct-Reduced Iron

  • Geonu Kim
  • Yilmaz Kacar
  • Petrus Christiaan PistoriusEmail author
Communication
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

The concentration and chemical bonding state of carbon in direct-reduced iron (DRI) might affect DRI melting temperature and rate. The effects of carbon bonding state and concentration were evaluated with high-temperature confocal microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and by monitoring the carbon monoxide generation rate from reaction between DRI pellets and a laboratory slag-steel melt. In industrial steelmaking, DRI melting is likely controlled by heat transfer; the concentration and bonding state of carbon play secondary roles.

Notes

The authors are grateful for financial and technical support by the members of the Center for Iron and Steelmaking Research. The authors would like to acknowledge use of the Materials Characterization Facility at Carnegie Mellon University under Grant # MCF-677785

References

  1. 1.
    F. Memoli and K. Kemper: in AISTech 2018 Proceedings, Association for Iron and Steel Technology, Warrendale, PA, pp. 625–32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Duarte: in AISTech 2018 Proceedings, Association for Iron and Steel Technology, Warrendale, PA, pp. 633–47.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Memoli: Iron Steel Technol., April 2016, vol. 13, pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. He and P.C. Pistorius: Iron Steel Technol., January 2017, vol. 14, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Pauluzzi, B. Franco, A. Martinis, A. Piccoli, and O. Meccaniche: in AISTech 2018 Proceedings, Association for Iron and Steel Technology, Warrendale, PA, pp. 731–38.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. He and P.C. Pistorius: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, vol. 47, pp. 1538–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Ray, Center for Iron and Steelmaking Research, Carnegie Mellon University, unpublished research, 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.A. Goldstein, R.J. Fruehan, and B. Ozturk: Iron & Steelmaker, 1999, vol. 26(2), pp. 49-61.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Barati and E. Sharafi: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2012, vol. 43, pp. 680–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.J. Min and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Trans. B, 1992, vol. 23, pp. 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.W. Bale, E. Bélisle, P. Chartrand, S.A. Decterov, G. Eriksson, A.E. Gheribi, K. Hack, I.H. Jung, Y.B. Kang, J. Melançon, A.D. Pelton, S. Petersen, C. Robelin, J. Sangster, P. Spencer, and M.A. Van Ende: Calphad, 2016, vol. 55, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Iron and Steelmaking Research (CISR)Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations