Advertisement

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 2197–2204 | Cite as

Silicon Production via Reaction of Silicon Tetrachloride and Aluminum Subchloride

  • Roman A. ZakirovEmail author
  • Oleg G. Parfenov
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Silicon tetrachloride reduction by aluminum subchloride was studied experimentally. Aluminum subchloride was synthesized in a reaction of metallic aluminum and AlCl3; a burner-like construction of the reactor was used to avoid the direct reaction of aluminum and SiCl4. The reduction was conducted at a pressure of 0.1 MPa and two temperature regimes: 1273 K and 1373 K (1000 °C and 1100 °C). As a result, two types of products were obtained: crystals and fine particles. The crystals formation occurred in the high-temperature zone, whereas the particles were dispersed by argon flow and concentrated mainly in aluminum chloride by-product in the cold part of the reactor. It was shown that silicon yield increased with increasing AlCl concentration. The temperature of the reduction process did not have a significant effect on the ultimate silicon yield. However, the silicon etching reaction rate and fine particles yield increased as temperature increased. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the impurities content in silicon crystals was below the detection limit. In contrast, the aluminum content in the powder product was 2 to 3 wt pct. Another type of product, yellow blanket-like silicon fibers, was obtained with a high yield at 1373 K (1100 °C) and low [AlCl]:[SiCl4] ratio.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    1. J. Safariana, G. Tranella and M. Tangstada: Energy Procedia, 2012, vol. 20, pp. 88 – 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    2. K. Yasuda and T.H. Okabe: JOM, 2010, vol. 62 (12), pp. 94-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    3. C.W. Won, H.H. Nersisyan and H.I. Won: Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2011, vol. 95, pp. 745-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    4. X. Xie, K. Lau and A. Sanjurjo: Metal. Metall. Mater. Trans. E., 2016, vol. 4E, pp. 2017-29.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    5. K. Shinoda, H. Murakami, Y. Sawabe and K. Saegusa: Chem. Eng. J., 2012, vol. 198-199, pp. 61-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Myrick: Production of Metals and Their Alloys, WO 01/45906 A2, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    7. R.A. Zakirov, O.G. Parfenov and L.A. Solovyov: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2018, vol. 49B, pp.13-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    8. O.G. Parfenov and G.L. Pashkov: Dokl. Chem., 2008, vol. 422 (2), pp. 225–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    9. K. Yasuda, K. Saegusa and T.H. Okabe: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2011, vol. 42, pp. 37-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    10. T. Kikuchi, T. Yagihashi and T. Kurosawa: Mater. Trans. JIM, 1964, Vol. 5, pp. 122-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    11. T. Kikuchi, T. Yagihashi and T. Kurosawa: Mater. Trans. JIM, 1972, Vol. 13, pp. 365-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    12. N. Uesawa, S. Inasawa and Y. Tsuji: J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, vol. 114, pp. 4291–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    13. H. Schäffer: Chemical Transport Reactions, Academic press, New York and London, 1964, pp. 40-44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of SB RASKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations