Advertisement

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 161–178 | Cite as

Effect of Strain Rate and Temperature on the Tensile Flow Behavior and Microstructure Evolution in Fe-0.3 Pct C-CrMoV Grade Steel

  • G. Dilip Chandra Kumar
  • V. Anil Kumar
  • R. K. GuptaEmail author
  • S. V. S. Narayana Murty
  • B. P. Kashyap
Article
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of temperature and strain rate on the tensile flow behavior of Fe-0.3 pct C-CrMoV grade steel was studied over a wide range of strain rates (10−4 to 10−1 s−1) and temperatures (700 °C to 950 °C). The flow curves of the steel showed typical dynamic recovery (DRV)-type characteristics at low temperature, high strain rate, and dynamic recrystallization (DRX) type at high temperature > 775 °C. Stress regimes with stress exponent (n) of 3.6 to 5.5 for low–high stresses were observed. The ‘n’ values at temperatures of 850 °C and 900 °C were found to be > 4, which correspond to dislocation climb as the rate controlling mechanism. At 950 °C, ‘n’ value was found to be < 4, where viscous glide is the rate controlling mechanism. The apparent activation energy (Q) was found to be 320 ± 12 kJ mol−1. Hence, the dominant high-temperature deformation mechanism was identified as high-temperature climb of edge dislocations. The strain rate sensitivity index (m) of the steel was evaluated using jump strain rate tests and cyclic temperature and strain rate jump tests over temperatures of 700 °C to 950 °C and strain rates of 10−4 to 10−3 s−1 . Although, ‘m’ value as high as 0.5 was observed, cavitation resulted in premature failure during deformation resulting in low elongation. The volume fraction of cavities was inversely proportional to the strain rate at all temperatures. The fine-grained microstructure aids grain boundary sliding, and diffusion thereby favors the cavity growth at low strain rates. Microstructures evolved during the high-temperature tensile tests were analyzed and the optimum conditions for hot deformation i.e., hot rolling/hot forming schedules were determined as the temperature range of 850 °C to 950 °C and strain rate range of 10−3 to 10−4 s−1. The flow stress data for the steel were found to follow the universal Dorn sine hyperbolic equation.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank National Facility for texture and OIM Lab, IIT Bombay for the support provided in EBSD work. The authors also acknowledge the support of FIST lab, MEMS department, for the support extended for testing and IFF/MME/VSSC for the fabrication support extended by them. The authors also thankfully acknowledge GM and DD, MME/VSSC for providing guidance during this work and Director, VSSC for kind permission to publish the work.

References

  1. 1.
    T.V. Philip and T.J. McCaffy: Metals Handbook, vol. 1, 10th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Sreekumar, M. S. P. Murthy, A. Natarajan, P. P. Sinha, and K. V. Nagarajan: Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., 1982, vol. 35, pp. 349–55.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. M. Padki, M. S. N. Balasubramanian, K. M. Gupta, and P. K. Rao: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1983, vol. 10, pp.180–85.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Chatterjee, M. S. N. Balasubramanian, K. M. Gupta, and P.K. Rao: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1990, vol. 17, pp. 38–42.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Saravanan, R. Suresh Kumar, V.M.J. Sharma, D. Sivakumar, P. Ramkumar, P. Ramesh Narayanan, K. Sreekumar and P.P. Sinha: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2012, vol. 710, pp. 433–38.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. K. Maity, N. B. Ballal and R. Kawalla: The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan International, 2006, vol. 46, pp. 1361-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. K. Maity, N. B. Ballal, R. Kawalla and G. Goldhahn: The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan International, 2008, vol. 49, pp. 902-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.R. Suresh: Development of a new ultrahigh strength steel and studies of its microstructure and properties, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Material Science, IIT Bombay, India, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. R. Suresh: Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., 2011, vol. 64, pp. 483–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. R. Suresh, I. Samajdar, A. Ingle, N. B. Ballal, P. K. Rao and P. P. Sinha: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2003, vol. 30, pp. 379-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.R. Bandyopadhyay: Ultrahigh strength steel development using electroslag refining with inoculation, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Material Science, IIT Bombay, India, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Ramkumar, V. Anil Kumar, R.K. Gupta, M.K. Karthikeyan, S. Narahari Prasad, F. Gino Prakash, K.V.A. Chakravarthi, Y. Maruthi Prasad and P. V. Venkitakrishnan: Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., 2018,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-018-1283-2.
  13. 13.
    T. R Bandyopadhyay, P. K. Rao and N. Prabhu: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2006, vol. 33, pp. 331-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Gladman: The physical Metallurgy of microalloyed steels, 1st Ed., Institute of Matetrials, The University Press, London, 1997, pp. 28-34.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F.B. Pickering and T. Gladman: ISI Special Report, pp. 81–83, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. K. Mishra, S. Das and S. Ranganathan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2002, vol. 323, pp. 285–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Ramkumar, V. Anil Kumar, R.K. Gupta, M.K. Karthikeyan, C. Magadum and V. Muthupandi: Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., 2016,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0927-3.
  18. 18.
    M.R. Suresh, P.P. Sinha, D.S. Sarma, N.B. Ballal and P. Krishna Rao: J. Mater. Sci., 2007, vol. 42, pp. 5602–12.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Alsagabi, T. Shrestha and I. Charit: J. Nucl. Mater., 2014, vol. 453 pp. 151–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Y. C. Huang, Y. C. Lin, J. Deng, G. Liu, M. S. Chen: Mater. Des., 2014, vol. 53, pp. 349-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. K. Mukerjee, J. E. Bird and J. E. Dorn: Trans. ASM, 1969, vol. 62, pp.155-79.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. J Frost and M. F. Ashby: Deformation mechanism maps, The plasticity and creep of metals and ceramics, 1st Ed., Pergoman press, Oxford, UK, 1982, pp. 1-11.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. M. Sellars and W.T. M. Tegart: Int. Metal. Rev., 1972, vol. 17, pp. 1-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B.P. Kashyap and A.K. Mukherjee: Res. Mechanica., 1986, vol. 17, pp. 293-355.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. H. Chokshi: Met. Trans. A., 1987, vol. 18, pp. 63-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Ridley and Z.C. Wang: Mater. Sci. For., 1994, vol. 170-172, pp. 177-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Ridley and Z.C. Wang: Mater. Sci. For., 1997, vol. 233-234, pp. 63-80.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J.P. Speer, C.M. Enloe, K.O. Findley, C.J. Van Tyne and E.J. Pavlina, in Fundamentals and Applications of Mo and Nb Alloying in High Performance Steels, vol. 2, TMS, UK, 2015, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Okamoto, A. Borgenstam and J. Argen: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 4783-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    V. Nagarajan: Int. Heat. Treat. Surf. Eng., 2014, vol 8-2, pp.80-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Gong, E.J. Palmiere and W.M. Rainforth: Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 97, pp.392-403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Schwaiger, B. Moser, M. Dao, N. Chollacoop and S. Suresh: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp.5159-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y. Maehara and T. G. Langdon: Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 1990, vol. 128, pp. 1-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Dilip Chandra Kumar
    • 1
  • V. Anil Kumar
    • 2
  • R. K. Gupta
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. V. S. Narayana Murty
    • 2
  • B. P. Kashyap
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials ScienceIIT BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Materials and Mechanical EntityVikram Sarabhai Space CentreTrivandrumIndia
  3. 3.Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials ScienceIIT JodhpurJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations