Archives of Osteoporosis

, 14:89 | Cite as

An investigation into the effects of kinesiotaping for posture correction on kyphosis angle, pain, and balance in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis-associated thoracic kyphosis

  • Deniz BulutEmail author
  • Banu Dilek
  • Adem Kılınç
  • Hülya Ellidokuz
  • Sema Öncel
Original Article



Although positive effect of kinesiotaping in reducing back pain in addition to exercise was observed in 6-week follow-up, no additional contribution to exercise was demonstrated in kyphosis angle and balance assessment. Instantaneous positive effect of taping was observed in kyphosis angle and static balance measurement using a SportKAT device measurements 30 min after taping.


The present study aims to investigate whether kinesiotaping for posture correction in patients with osteoporosis-related increased kyphosis provides additional benefits to routine osteoporosis and balance exercises in reducing dorsal kyphosis angle, pain, and balance.


A single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with unblinded assessments at baseline, week 3, and week 6 and additional measures 30 min immediately after taping in intervention group only. Forty-two female osteoporotic patients with hyperkyphosis were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group received an exercise program plus 3 sessions of kinesiotaping over the upper back; the control group received only an exercise program. The primary outcome measure was dorsal kyphosis angle, measured using a digital inclinometer. Secondary outcome measures were pain assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS 0–10 cm) and balance assessed with the Berg Balance Scale and SportKAT device.


The study was conducted on 22 patients with an average age of 64 ± 7.08 in the control group and 20 patients with an average age of 63.1 ± 8.8 in the treatment group. There was not a significant difference when dorsal kyphosis angle of the two groups was compared in terms of the change between the baseline and week 6. The mean change in the control group was 0.86 ± 2 while it was 0.70 ± 1.75 in the intervention group. No significant difference was detected between the groups in terms of balance measurements. Significant differences were seen in favor of the intervention group when the VAS pain scores of the two groups were compared in terms of the change between the baseline and week 3 (p < 0.001) and the baseline and week 6 (p < 0.001), while no such difference was identified when the changes between weeks 3 and 6 were compared between the two groups. A significant effect on dorsal kyphosis angle and balance was also shown in the treatment group 30 min after taping.


Application of kinesiotaping may have short-term positive effects on pain, but is unlikely to have significant effects on kyphosis angle or balance for women with osteoporosis. Positive changes seen in kyphosis angle and balance 30 min after taping are short-lived.


Kyphosis angle Balance Berg Balance Scale Kinesiotaping 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Bonner FJ, Chesnut CH, Lindsay R (2005) Osteoporosis. In: Delisa JA (ed) Physical medicine and rehabilitation, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 699–719Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL, Prince RL (1999) A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 9(6):508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trone DW, Kritz-Silverstein D, Von Mühlen DG, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E (2007) Is radiographic vertebral fracture a risk factor for mortality? Am J Epidemiol 166(10):1191–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katzman WB, Wanek L, Shepherd JA, Sellmeyer DE (2010) Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40(6):352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarıdoğan ME (2005) Osteoporoz Epidemiyolojisi. Gökçe Kutsal Y (ed) Osteoporoz, Ankara, pp 5–36Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinaki M (1998) Musculoskeletal challenges of osteoporosis. Aging 10(3):249–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greig AM, Bennell KL, Briggs AM, Hodges PW (2008) Postural taping decreases thoracic kyphosis but does not influence trunk muscle electromyographic activity or balance in women with osteoporosis. Man Ther 13(3):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esses SI, McGuire R, Jenkins J, Finkelstein J, Woodard E, Watters WC III, Goldberg MJ, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Boyer KM, Hitchcock K, Raymond L (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1934–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodwin VA, Hall AJ, Rogers E, Bethel A (2016) Orthotics and taping in the management of vertebral fractures in people with osteoporosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open 6(5):e01065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gunendi Z, Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, Demirsoy N (2008) The effect of 4-week aerobic exercise program on postural balance in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Rheumatol Int 28(12):1217–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bozan Ö, Koçyiǧit F, Cankurtaran F, El Ö, Gülbahar S, Peker Ö (2010) Postmenopozal osteoporozda egzersi̇z eǧti̇mi̇ni̇n kas kuvveti̇ ve dengeye etki̇si̇. Turk Geriatr Derg 13(2):92–98Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Capecci M, Serpicelli C, Fiorentini L, Censi G, Ferretti M, Orni C, Renzi R, Provinciali L, Ceravolo MG (2014) Postural rehabilitation and kinesio taping for axial postural disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(6):1067–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmer S, Barnett S, Cramp M, Berry A, Thomas A, Clark EM (2018) Effects of postural taping on pain, function and quality of life following osteoporotic vertebral fractures-a feasibility trial. Musculoskeletal Care 16(3):345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deniz Bulut
    • 1
    Email author
  • Banu Dilek
    • 1
  • Adem Kılınç
    • 1
  • Hülya Ellidokuz
    • 2
  • Sema Öncel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDokuz Eylul University Faculty of MedicineIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Physical Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of MedicineDokuz Eylul UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations