FRAX® based intervention thresholds for management of osteoporosis in Singaporean women
- 85 Downloads
Potential FRAX®-based major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) intervention thresholds (ITs) for postmenopausal Singaporean women were explored. Age-dependent ethnic-specific and weighted mean ITs progressively increased with increasing age. Fixed ITs were derived via discriminatory value analysis. MOF and HF ITs with highest the Youden index were chosen as optimal.
We aimed to explore FRAX®-based intervention thresholds (ITs) to potentially guide osteoporosis treatment in Singapore, a multi-ethnic nation.
One thousand and one Singaporean postmenopausal community-dwelling women belonging to Chinese, Malay and Indian ethnicities underwent clinical risk factor (CRF) and BMD assessment. FRAX® major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) probabilities were calculated using ethnic-specific models. We employed the translational logic adopted by NOGG (UK), whereby osteoporosis treatment is recommended to any postmenopausal woman whose fracture probability based on other CRFs is similar to or exceeds that of an age-matched woman with a fracture. Using the same logic, ethnic-specific and mean weighted age-dependent ITs were computed. Employing these age-dependent ITs as a reference, the performance of fixed (age-independent) ITs were examined using ROC curves and discriminatory analysis, with the highest Youden index (YI) (sensitivity + specificity − 1) used to identify the optimal MOF and HF ITs.
The mean age was 58.9 (6.9) years. Seven hundred and eighty-nine (79%) women were Chinese, 136 (13.5%) Indian and 76 (7.5%) Malay. Age-dependent MOF ITs ranged from 3.1 to 33%, 2.5 to 17% and 2.5 to 16% whilst HF ITs ranged from 0.7 to 17%, 0.4 to 6% and 0.4 to 6.3% in Chinese, Malay and Indian women, respectively, between the ages of 50 and 90 years. The weighted age-dependent MOF and HF ITs ranged from 2.9% and 0.6%, respectively, at the age of 50, to 28% and 14% at 90 years of age. Fixed MOF/HF ITs of 5.5%/1%, 2.5%/1% and 2.5%/0.25% were identified as the most optimal by the highest YI in Chinese, Malay and Indian women, respectively. Fixed MOFP and HF ITs of 4% and 1%, respectively, were found to be most optimal on the weighted means analysis.
The ITs for osteoporosis treatment in Singapore show marked variations across ethnicities. Weighted mean thresholds may overcome the dilemma of intervening at different thresholds for different ethnicities. Choosing fixed ITs may have to involve trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity. FRAX®-based age-dependent or the fixed intervention thresholds suggested as an alternative to be considered for use in Singapore though further studies on the societal and health economic impacts of choosing these thresholds in Singapore are needed.
KeywordsFragility fracture FRAX Guidelines Intervention threshold Osteoporosis Singapore Treatment threshold
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis (1994) Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129Google Scholar
- 2.Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Clarke BL, Harris ST, Hurley DL, Kleerekoper M, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Narula HS, Pessah-Pollack R, Tangpricha V, Wimalawansa SJ, Watts NB (2016) American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the Diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis - 2016. Endocr Pract 22(Suppl 4):1–42. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161435.GL CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Fong-Soe-Khioe R, Fordham R et al (2018) Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 391(10122):741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32640-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Austin M, Siris E, Wang A et al (2012) Denosumab reduces the risk of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women, particularly in those with moderate to high fracture risk as assessed with FRAX. J Bone Miner Res 27(7):1480–1486. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1606 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Orimo H, Nakamura T, Hosoi T, Iki M, Uenishi K, Endo N, Ohta H, Shiraki M, Sugimoto T, Suzuki T, Soen S, Nishizawa Y, Hagino H, Fukunaga M, Fujiwara S (2012) Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis--executive summary. Arch Osteoporos 7:3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0109-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Leong KH, Feng PH (1997) Bone mineral density measurements using the Hologic QD2000 in 175 Singaporean women aged 20–80. Singap Med J 38(1):25–26Google Scholar
- 24.YOUDEN WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3(1):32–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.McCloskey E, Kanis JA, Johansson H, Harvey N, Odén A, Cooper A, Cooper C, Francis RM, Reid DM, Marsh D, Selby P, Thompson F, Hewitt S, Compston J (2015) FRAX-based assessment and intervention thresholds--an exploration of thresholds in women aged 50 years and older in the UK. Osteoporos Int 26(8):2091–2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3176-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Eichler HG, Kong SX, Gerth WC, Mavros P, Jönsson B (2004) Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge? Value Health 7(5):518–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar