Advertisement

Archives of Osteoporosis

, 13:126 | Cite as

Chronic kidney disease predicts a lower probability of improvement in patient-reported experience measures among patients with fractures: a prospective multicenter cohort study

  • Chia-Ter Chao
  • Rong-Sen Yang
  • Li-Wei Hung
  • Keh-Sung Tsai
  • Jen-Kuei Peng
  • Chung-Hsun Chang
  • Wei-Yih Chiu
  • Kun-Pei Lin
  • Chen-Ti Wang
  • Chiung-Jung Wen
  • Ding-Cheng ChanEmail author
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Summary

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are integral component of care for fracture patients. Using a multicenter cohort, we showed that the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) attenuated the probability of PREM improvement in fracture patients.

Introduction

Assessing PREM can assist physicians in improving patients’ experiences. Patients with CKD are at an increased risk of exhibiting poor PREM and developing fractures. We aimed to assess whether CKD influences the probability of PREM improvement during follow-up among patients with fractures.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with hip or vertebral fractures from different institutes into a fracture liaison service program. After registering clinical histories, they received a baseline PREM assessment based on EuroQol group–5 dimension content, including self-care, daily activity, and pain severity using a 5-point Likert scale. A follow-up PREM assessment was arranged 4 months later, and we evaluated whether baseline CKD was predictive of PREM improvement.

Results

Among 593 fracture patients (18% with CKD), 37.3% and 62.7% presented with hip and vertebral fractures, respectively. Self-care, daily activity, and pain severity improved after follow-up in 32%, 27%, and 43% participants; those with CKD exhibited worse self-care ability and daily activity than those without. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that baseline CKD was significantly associated with lower possibility of improvement in daily activity (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, p = 0.049) and pain severity (OR 0.52, p = 0.01), and an insignificant change in the possibility of improvement in self-care ability (OR 0.61, p = 0.09).

Conclusions

The presence of CKD predicts a significantly lower probability of PREM improvement among fracture patients. An early emphasis on renal function during fracture care should be considered.

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease EQ-5D Fracture Pain Patient-reported experiences 

Abbreviations

BMD

bone mineral density

BMI

body mass index

CI

confidence interval

CKD

chronic kidney disease

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration rate

DM

diabetes mellitus

EQ-5D

EuroQol Group–5 dimensions

FLS

fracture liaison service

KDIGO

Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes

OR

odds ratio

PREM

patient-reported experience measure

SERM

selective estrogen receptor modulator

SF-36

short-form 36

VCF

vertebral compression fracture

WHO-QOL

World Health Organization–quality of life

Notes

Authors’ contributions

Study design: CTC, RSY, DCC; data analysis: CTC, DCC; article drafting: CTC, LWH, KST, JKP, CHC, WYC, KPL, CTW, CJW, DCC; article approval: all authors.

Funding

The study is financially sponsored by internal research fund from National Taiwan University Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

The current study has been approved by the local institutional review board (National Taiwan University Hospital, NO. 201311048RINC), which allowed recruitment of suitable candidates from its main facility and branches. All participants provided written informed consent on enrollment. The study protocol adhered to the declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

None.

Sponsor’s role

The sponsors have no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and result interpretation of this study.

Supplementary material

11657_2018_539_MOESM1_ESM.doc (202 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 201 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gleeson H, Calderon A, Swami V, Deighton J, Wolpert M, Edbrooke-Childs J (2016) Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings. BMJ Open 6(8):e011907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black N (2013) Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 346:f167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotajarvi BR, Schafer MJ, Atkinson EJ, Traynor MM, Bruce CJ, Greason KL, Suri RM, Miller JD, LeBrasseur NK (2017) The impact of frailty on patient-centered outcomes following aortic valve replacement. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 72(7):917–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prodinger B, Taylor P (2018) Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples. BMC Health Serv Res 18(1):87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber M, Craiovan B, Woemer ML, Schwarz T, Grifka J, Renkawitz TF (2018) Predictors of outcome after primary total joint replacement. J Arthroplast 33(2):431–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman SM, Mendelson DA (2014) Epidemiology of fragility fractures. Clin Geriatr Med 30(2):175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lystad RP, Cameron CM, Mitchell RJ (2017) Mortality risk among older Australians hospitalised with hip fracture: a population-based matched cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 12(1):67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orwig DL, Hochberg M, Yu-Yahiro J, Resnick B, Hawkes WG, Shardell M, Hebel JR, Colvin P, Miller RR, Golden J, Zimmerman S, Magaziner J (2011) Delivery and outcomes of a yearlong home exercise program after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(4):323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peeters CMM, Visser E, Van de Ree CLP, Gosens T, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J (2016) Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: a systematic literature review. Injury 47(7):1369–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffin XL, Parsons N, Achten J, Fernandez M, Costa ML (2015) Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. the Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation - a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 97-B(3):372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aspenberg P, Malouf J, Tarantino U, García-Hernández PA, Corradini C, Overgaard S, Stepan JJ, Borris L, Lespessailles E, Frihagen F, Papavasiliou K, Petto H, Caeiro JR, Marin F (2016) Effects of Teriparatide compared with Risedronate on recovery after Pertrochanteric hip fracture: results of a randomized, active-controlled, double-blind clinical trial at 26 weeks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(22):1868–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slobogean GP, Stockton DJ, Zeng B, Wang D, Ma B-t, Pollak AN (2017) Femoral neck fractures in adults treated with internal fixation: a prospective multicenter Chinese cohort. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25(4):297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flythe JE, Powell JD, Poulton CJ, Westreich KD, Handler L, Reeve BB, Carey TS (2015) Patient-reported outcome instruments for physical symptoms among patients receiving maintenance Dialysis: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 66(6):1033–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fusaro M, D’Angelo A, Scalzo G, Gallieni M, Giannini S, Guglielmi G (2010) Vertebral fractures in dialysis: Endocrinological disruption of the bone-kidney axis. J Endocrinol Investig 33(5):347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim SM, Long J, Montez-Rath M, Leonard M, Chertow GM (2016) Hip fracture in patients with non-Dialysis-requiring chronic kidney disease. J Bone Miner Res 31(10):1803–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hwang J-S, Chan D-C, Chen J-F, Cheng T-T, Wu C-H, Soong Y-K, Tsai K-S, Yang R-S (2014) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Taiwan: summary. J Bone Miner Metab 32(1):10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shipman KE, Stammers J, Doyle A, Gittoes N (2016) Delivering a quality-assured fracture liaison service in a UK teaching hospital—is it achievable? Osteoporos Int 27(10):3049–3056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chao C-T, Wu V-C, Tsai H-B, Wu C-H, Lin Y-F, Wu K-D, Ko W-J, NSARF group (2014) Impact of body mass index on outcomes of geriatric postoperative acute kidney injury patients. Shock 41(5):400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) et al (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150(9):604–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haywood KL, Brett J, Tutton E, Staniszewska S (2017) Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability. Qual Life Res 26(4):799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luo N, Li M, Liu GG, Lloyd A, de Charro F, Herdman M (2013) Developing the Chinese version of the new 5-level EQ-5D descriptive system: the response scaling approach. Qual Life Res 22(4):885–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rogan A, McCarthy K, McGregor G, Hamborg T, Evans G, Hewins S, Aldridge N, Fletcher S, Krishnan N, Higgins R, Zehnder D, Ting SM (2017) Quality of life measures predict cardiovascular health and physical performance in chronic renal failure patients. PLoS One 12(9):e0183926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, Marshall T, Gheorghe A, Keeley T, Slade A, Calvert M (2017) Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. PLoS One 12(6):e0179733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Honkavaara N, Al-Ani AN, Campenfeldt P, Ekström W, Hedström M (2016) Good responsiveness with EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire and short form (36) health survey in 20-69 years old patients with a femoral neck fracture: a 2-year prospective follow-up study in 182 patients. Injury 47(8):1692–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nixon A, Doll H, Kerr C, Burge R, Naegeli AN (2016) Interpreting change from patient reported outcome (PRO) endpoints: patient global ratings of concept versus patient global ratings of change, a case study among osteoporosis patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perrone RD, Coons SJ, Cavanaugh K, Finkelstein F, Meyer KB (2013) Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of CKD-related therapies: report of a symposium sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration. Am J Kidney Dis 62(6):1046–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maier GS, Seeger JB, Horas K, Roth KE, Kurth AA, Maus U (2015) The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with vertebral fragility fractures. Bone Joint J 97-B(1):89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Broy SB (2016) The vertebral fracture cascade: etiology and clinical implications. J Clin Densitom 19(1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kildow BJ, Agaba P, Moore BF, Hallows RK, Bolognesi MP, Seyler TM (2017) Postoperative impact of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, and renal transplant after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(9S):S135–S140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chin RP, Ho CH, Cheung LP (2013) Scheduled analgesic regimen improves rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2349–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chao CT, Huang JW (2016) Geriatric syndromes are potential determinants of the medication adherence status in prevalent dialysis patients. PeerJ 4:e2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ponnusamy KE, Jain A, Thakkar SC, Sterling RS, Skolasky RL, Khanuja HS (2015) Inpatient mortality and morbidity for dialysis-dependent patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(16):1326–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson S, Sharp CA, Davie MWJ (2015) Health-related quality of life in women referred for bone density assessment: relationships with bone mineral density, fracture and co-morbidity. Qual Life Res 24(5):1235–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ravindra V, Guan J, Holland C, Dailey A, Schmidt M, Godzik J, Hood RS, Ray WZ, Bisson EF (2016) Vitamin D status in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison of fusion rates and patient outcome measures. A preliminary experience. J Neurosurg Sci Sep 2. https://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/neurosurgical-sciences/article.php?cod=R38Y9999N00A16090201#modal_3. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
  35. 35.
    Stienen MN, Joswig H, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Gautschi OP (2016) Influence of body mass index on subjective and objective measures of pain, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life in lumbar degenrative disc disease. World Neurosurg 96:570–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen JY, Lo NN, Chong HC, Bin Abd Razak HR, Pang HN, Tay DK, Chia SL, Yeo SJ (2016) The influence of body mass index on functional outcome and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98-B(6):780–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Elberling TV, Rasmussen AK, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hording M, Perrild H, Waldemar G (2004) Impaired health-related quality of life in graves’ disease. A prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol 151(5):549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tuchendler D, Bolanowski M (2014) The influence of thyroid dysfunction on bone metabolism. Thyroid Res 7(1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chia-Ter Chao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Rong-Sen Yang
    • 5
  • Li-Wei Hung
    • 5
  • Keh-Sung Tsai
    • 6
  • Jen-Kuei Peng
    • 1
  • Chung-Hsun Chang
    • 5
  • Wei-Yih Chiu
    • 4
  • Kun-Pei Lin
    • 4
    • 7
  • Chen-Ti Wang
    • 5
  • Chiung-Jung Wen
    • 7
  • Ding-Cheng Chan
    • 4
    • 7
    • 8
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu branchTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital Jin-Shan branchNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  3. 3.Graduate Institute of Toxicology, School of MedicineNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
  5. 5.Department of OrthopedicsNational Taiwan University Hospital and College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
  6. 6.Superintendent Office, Far Eastern PolyclinicTaipeiTaiwan
  7. 7.Department of Geriatrics and GerontologyNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  8. 8.Superintendent OfficeNational Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung BranchHsin-ChuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations