“We get them up, moving, and out the door. How do we get them to do what is recommended?” Using behaviour change theory to put exercise evidence into action for rehabilitation professionals
- 616 Downloads
Recommendations suggest a multicomponent exercise for people with osteoporosis. We identified rehabilitation professionals’ barriers and facilitators to implementing exercise recommendations with people with osteoporosis, and used those to make suggestions for targeted knowledge translation interventions. Future work will report on development and evaluation of the interventions informed by our study.
Rehabilitation professionals can help people with osteoporosis to engage in a multicomponent exercise program and perform activities of daily living safely. However, rehabilitation professional face barriers to implementing exercise evidence, especially for specific disease conditions like osteoporosis. We performed a behavioural analysis and identified rehabilitation professionals’ barriers to and facilitators of implementing disease-specific physical activity and exercise recommendations (Too Fit to Fracture recommendations), and used the Behaviour Change Wheel to select interventions.
Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with rehabilitation professionals, including physical therapists, kinesiologists, and occupational therapists, and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers coded data and identified emerging themes. Using the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, themes were categorized into capability, opportunity, and motivation, and relevant interventions were identified.
Ninety-four rehabilitation professionals (mean age 40.5 years, 88.3% female) participated. Identified barriers were as follows: capability—lack of training in behaviour change, how to modify recommendations for physical and cognitive impairments; opportunity—lack of resources, time, and team work; motivation—lack of trust between providers, fear in providing interventions that may cause harm. Interventions selected were as follows: education, training, enablement, modelling and persuasion. Policy categories are communication/marketing, guidelines, service provision and environmental/social planning.
Key barriers to implementing the recommendations are rehabilitation professionals’ ability to use behaviour change techniques, to modify the recommendations for physical and cognitive limitations and to feel comfortable with delivering challenging but safe interventions for people with osteoporosis, and lacking trust and team work across sectors. Future work will report on development and evaluation of knowledge translation interventions informed by our study.
KeywordsPhysical activity Physical therapy Osteoporosis Health care provider Guidelines Knowledge translation Implementation science
We gratefully acknowledge Sospeter Gatobu, Ruchit Patel, Rebecca Clark and Jaylyn Leighton for their assistance with data collection and transcription. The research was funded by an Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Health Research System Fund Capacity Award. Dr. Giangregorio received funding from an Ontario Ministry of Health Research and Innovation-Early Researcher Award, Canadian Institute of Health Research New Investigator Award and Canadian Foundation for Innovation. Dr. Cheung is supported by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Musculoskeletal and Postmenopausal Health.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
- 3.Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD, for the Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182(17):1864–1873. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.100771 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bonner FJ Jr, Sinaki M, Grabois M, Shipp KM, Lane JM, Lindsay R, Gold DT, Cosman F, Bouxsein ML, Weinstein JN, Gallagher RM (2003) Health professional’s guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 14(2):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1467-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Giangregorio LM, Papaioannou A, MacIntyre NJ, Ashe MC, Heinonen A, Shipp K et al (2014) Too Fit To Fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporosis Int:1–15Google Scholar
- 6.Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, for the GRADE Working Group (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Guide to Knowledge Translation Planning at CIHR: Integrated and End-of-Grant Approaches. [Internet]. . Available from: Guide to Knowledge Translation Planning at CIHR: Integrated and End-of-Grant ApproachesGoogle Scholar
- 10.Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
- 11.Rutten GM, Harting J, Bartholomew LK, Braspenning JC, Van Dolder R, Heijmans MFGJ et al (2014) Development of a theory- and evidence-based intervention to enhance implementation of physical therapy guidelines for the management of low back pain. Arch Public Health 72(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-1
- 12.van Bodegom-Vos L, Verhoef J, Dickmann M, Kleijn M, van Vliet I, Hurkmans E, van der Wees P, Vliet Vlieland T (2012) A qualitative study of barriers to the implementation of a rheumatoid arthritis guideline among generalist and specialist physical therapists. Phys Ther 92(10):1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110097 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Clark RE, McArthur C, Papaioannou A, Cheung AM, Laprade J, Lee L et al (2017) “I do not have time. Is there a handout I can use?”: combining physicians’ needs and behavior change theory to put physical activity evidence into practice. Osteoporos IntGoogle Scholar
- 15.Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J (2009) Qualitative description—the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol 9:52,2288–9-52Google Scholar
- 16.Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 19.Michie S, Atkins L, West R (2014) The Behaviour Change Wheel: a guide to designing interventions. 2nd ed. Silverback PublishingGoogle Scholar
- 20.Giangregorio LM, McGill S, Wark JD, Laprade J, Heinonen A, Ashe MC, MacIntyre NJ, Cheung AM, Shipp K, Keller H, Jain R, Papaioannou A (2015) Too Fit To Fracture: outcomes of a Delphi consensus process on physical activity and exercise recommendations for adults with osteoporosis with or without vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 26(3):891–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2881-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Foster NE, Delitto A (2011) Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice—challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther 91(5):790–803. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100326 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Synnott A, O’Keeffe M, Bunzli S, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan K (2015) Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother 61(2):68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Overmeer T, Boersma K, Main CJ, Linton SJ (2009) Do physical therapists change their beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills and behaviour after a biopsychosocially orientated university course? J Eval Clin Pract 15(4):724–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01089.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.O’Brien N, McDonald S, Araújo-Soares V, Lara J, Errington L, Godfrey A, Meyer TD, Rochester L, Mathers JC, White M, Sniehotta FF (2015) The features of interventions associated with long-term effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults aged 55–70 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 9(4):417–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Richards CL, Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Eng JJ, McKay-Lyons M, Harrison E, Teasell R, Harrison M, Graham ID (2012) Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project. Disabil Rehabil 34(19):1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.656790 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Muramatsu N, Madrigal J, Berbaum ML, Henderson VA, Jurivich DA, Zanoni J, Marquez DX, Cruz Madrid K (2015) Co-learning with home care aides and their clients: collaboratively increasing individual and organizational capacities. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 36(3):261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2015.1015121 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 45.Kotecha J, Brown JB, Han H, Harris SB, Green M, Russell G, et al (2015) Influence of a quality improvement learning collaborative program on team functioning in primary healthcare. Fam Syst HealthGoogle Scholar